Randomized Controlled Trials: Design and Implementation for Community-Based Psychosocial Interventions. Phyllis Solomon, Mary M. Cavanaugh, and Jeffrey Draine. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009, 217 pages. ISBN 978-0-19-533319-0 $24.95 paperback

Social Work ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-189
Author(s):  
P. Osteen
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dickerson ◽  
Jennifer Parker ◽  
Carrie Johnson ◽  
Ryan A. Brown ◽  
Elizabeth D'Amico

Abstract Background: Although the majority of American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) reside in urban areas, there are very few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing culturally centered substance use prevention interventions for this population. Methods: We describe methods employed to recruit and retain urban AI/AN adolescents into a RCT, which was focused on testing the potential benefits of a substance use prevention intervention for this population. We also report challenges encountered in recruitment and retention of participants and strategies employed addressing these challenges. Data collection occurred from August 2014 to October 2017. Results: We partnered with two community-based organizations in different cities in California. We utilized AI/AN recruiters from communities, placed flyers in community-based organizations, and asked organizations to post flyers on their web and social media sites. We also offered gift cards for participants. Our initial recruitment and retention model was moderately successful; however, we encountered five main challenges: 1) transportation, 2) increasing trust and interest, 3) adding research sites, 4) getting the word out about the project, and 5) getting youth to complete follow-up surveys. Strategies employed to overcome transportation challenges included shortening the number of sessions, offering sessions on both weekends and weekdays, and increasing bus tokens and transportation options. We hired more staff from AI/AN communities, added more research sites from our previously established relationships, and were more pro-active in getting the word out on the project in AI/AN communities. We also utilized more field tracking, and emailed and mailed survey invitations to reach more participants for their follow-up surveys. Because of our efforts, we were nearly able to reach our initial recruitment and retention goals. Conclusions: By identifying challenges and employing culturally appropriate strategies, we were able to collect valuable data on the potential effectiveness of a substance use prevention intervention for urban AI/AN adolescents. Findings from this study assist toward the development of potentially successful strategies to successfully recruit and retain urban AI/AN adolescents in RCTs.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 2729-2734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur F. Fonville ◽  
Neshika Samarasekera ◽  
Aidan Hutchison ◽  
David Perry ◽  
Yvo B. Roos ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose— Acute treatments specifically for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) are being sought in randomized controlled trials. The treatment effect sizes in ongoing and future trials are likely to be small, necessitating large sample sizes. Methods— We searched online trial registries for randomized controlled trials investigating an acute treatment for ICH. For the trials whose eligibility criteria could be assessed in a prospective, community-based ICH cohort study (2010–2011), we quantified the proportions of patients who were eligible and investigated influences on these proportions. Results— We applied the eligibility criteria of 17 trials to 166 adults with ICH, of whom between 0.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.3) to 40% (95% confidence interval, 33–48) were eligible for each trial. Fewer patients were eligible for trials restricted to patients randomized within 12 hours of ICH onset (versus trials with a longer time window; P =0.03) and trials restricting eligibility according to premorbid disability (versus trials without this restriction; P =0.046). Each additional eligibility criterion reduced the portion of eligible patients by 1.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.4–2.2; adjusted R 2 =0.47; P =0.004). Conclusions— Less than half of patients with ICH were eligible for current randomized controlled trials. Future trials could maximize enrollment by minimizing the number of eligibility criteria, maximizing the time window for recruiting patients after ICH onset, permitting premorbid disability, and using a simulator to assess the impact of other eligibility critiera ( www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/ICHsimulator/ ).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document