scholarly journals Malt Modification and its Effects on the Contributions of Barley Genotype to Beer Flavor

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin Herb ◽  
Tanya Filichkin ◽  
Scott Fisk ◽  
Laura Helgerson ◽  
Patrick Hayes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Campbell P. Morrissy ◽  
Michael Féchir ◽  
Harmonie M. Bettenhausen ◽  
Karli R. Van Simaeys ◽  
Scott Fisk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1914
Author(s):  
Scott Lafontaine ◽  
Kay Senn ◽  
Laura Knoke ◽  
Christian Schubert ◽  
Johanna Dennenlöhr ◽  
...  

Forty-two commercial non-alcoholic beer (NAB) brands were analyzed using sensory and chemical techniques to understand which analytes and/or flavors were most responsible for invoking the perception of “beer flavor” (for Northern Californian consumers). The aroma and taste profiles of the commercial NABs, a commercial soda, and a carbonated seltzer water (n = 44) were characterized using replicated descriptive and CATA analyses performed by a trained sensory panel (i.e., 11 panelists). A number of non-volatile and volatile techniques were then used to chemically deconstruct the products. Consumer analysis (i.e., 129 Northern Californian consumers) was also used to evaluate a selection of these NABs (i.e., 12) and how similar they thought the aroma, taste and mouthfeels of these products were to beer, soda, and water. The results show that certain constituents drive the aroma and taste profiles which are responsible for invoking beer perception for these North American consumers. Further, beer likeness might not be a driver of preference in this diverse beverage class for Northern Californian consumers. These are important insights for brewers planning to create products for similar markets and/or more broadly for companies interested in designing other functional/alternative food and beverage products.


2016 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 60-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lumbani Mwafulirwa ◽  
Elizabeth M. Baggs ◽  
Joanne Russell ◽  
Timothy George ◽  
Nicholas Morley ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Holub ◽  
Jakub Nezval ◽  
Michal Štroch ◽  
Vladimír Špunda ◽  
Otmar Urban ◽  
...  

Fermentation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Bing Zhou ◽  
Zhao Jin ◽  
Paul Schwarz ◽  
Yin Li

The phenolic content and antioxidant potential of malting barley are important in brewing. The objective of our study was to investigate the effects of barley genotype, growing environment, and malting conditions on the total phenolic content and antioxidant activities of malting barley grown in North America. Eight barley cultivars grown at three locations over three years were used. For the malting study, a single barley cultivar, separated into different kernel size fractions, was germinated for various periods of time and then processed by kilning or freeze-drying. Total phenolic content (TPC) and some of the antioxidant activities, including DPPH, ABTS, and superoxide anion radical scavenging activities, reducing power, and iron (II) chelating activity, were significantly impacted by the barley genotype, growth environment, and their interactions. The TPC and most antioxidant activities were also influenced by malting conditions and were generally higher in the malted barleys of the thin kernel size fraction, four-day germination, and in samples processed by kilning, when compared to the plumper kernel size fractions, one and two days of germination, and freeze-dried samples, respectively. There were interactions between malting parameters, and stepwise regression analysis was used to suggest the contribution of each parameter to the TPC and antioxidant activities.


1983 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ono ◽  
S. Hashimoto ◽  
Y. Kakudo ◽  
K. Nagami ◽  
J. Kumada
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuso Sakuma ◽  
Sachiko Hayashi ◽  
Keita Kobayashi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document