scholarly journals Chronic hypoxia in vivo increases von Willebrand factor expression in lung endothelial cells

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Huertas ◽  
Steven Greenberg ◽  
Maimaiti Yiming ◽  
Jahar Bhattacharya ◽  
Sunita Bhattacharya
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1329-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Mojiri ◽  
Maryam Nakhaii-Nejad ◽  
Wei-Lee Phan ◽  
Stephen Kulak ◽  
Aneta Radziwon-Balicka ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (06) ◽  
pp. 1182-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich M Vischer ◽  
Claes B Wollheinn

Summaryvon Willebrand factor (vWf) is released from endothelial cell storage granules after stimulation with thrombin, histamine and several other agents that induce an increase in cytosolic free calcium ([Ca2+]i). In vivo, epinephrine and the vasopressin analog DDAVP increase vWf plasma levels, although they are thought not to induce vWf release from endothelial cells in vitro. Since these agents act via a cAMP-dependent pathway in responsive cells, we examined the role of cAMP in vWf secretion from cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells. vWf release increased by 50% in response to forskolin, which activates adenylate cyclase. The response to forskolin was much stronger when cAMP degradation was blocked with IBMX, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterases (+200%), whereas IBMX alone had no effect. vWf release could also be induced by the cAMP analogs dibutyryl-cAMP (+40%) and 8-bromo-cAMP (+25%); although their effect was weak, they clearly potentiated the response to thrombin. Epinephrine (together with IBMX) caused a small, dose-dependent increase in vWf release, maximal at 10-6 M (+50%), and also potentiated the response to thrombin. This effect is mediated by adenylate cyclase-coupled β-adrenergic receptors, since it is inhibited by propranolol and mimicked by isoproterenol. In contrast to thrombin, neither forskolin nor epinephrine caused an increase in [Ca2+]j as measured by fura-2 fluorescence. In addition, the effects of forskolin and thrombin were additive, suggesting that they act through distinct signaling pathways. We found a close correlation between cellular cAMP content and vWf release after stimulation with epinephrine and forskolin. These results demonstrate that cAMP-dependent signaling events are involved in the control of exocytosis from endothelial cells (an effect not mediated by an increase in [Ca2+]i) and provide an explanation for epinephrine-induced vWf release.


2019 ◽  
Vol 282 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Mojiri ◽  
Parnian Alavi ◽  
Maria Areli Lorenzana Carrillo ◽  
Maryam Nakhaei-Nejad ◽  
Consolato M. Sergi ◽  
...  

Respiration ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 526-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Müller ◽  
Carmen Skrzynski ◽  
Guido Skipka ◽  
Klaus-Michael Müller

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
D D Wagner ◽  
P J Fay ◽  
L A Sporn ◽  
S Sinha ◽  
S O Lawrence ◽  
...  

The intracellular site of cleavage of pro-von Willebrand factor subunit and the subsequent fate of the propolypeptide (von Willebrand antigen II) and of the mature von Willebrand factor (vWf) were investigated. Both the propolypeptide, which was found to be a homodimer of non-covalently linked subunits, and mature vWf were released from Weibel-Palade bodies of endothelial cells following stimulation with secretagogues. The stoichiometry of the two proteins in the releasate was essentially equimolar. This indicates that vWf and the propolypeptide were packaged into the Weibel-Palade bodies as one unit, pro-vWf, and that the proteolytic cleavage of pro-vWf is likely to be a post-Golgi event. The association of prosequences into dimers provides support for their hypothetical role in the multimerization process. After secretion, the two proteins were distributed differently, as based on the following observations. The propolypeptide did not associate with vWf in the culture medium, did not co-distribute with vWf in the extracellular "patches of release" on stimulated endothelial cells, and was not detected in the endothelial cell extracellular matrix, which did contain vWf. Additionally, in contrast to vWf, the propolypeptide did not bind to matrix of human foreskin fibroblasts. Since the propolypeptide does not associate with vWf and does not interact witji extracellular matrices in vitro, it is highly unlikely that it would promote platelet adhesion to subendothelium in vivo.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document