scholarly journals Pharmacological differences between two mechanistically similar drug effects, nitrous oxide (N 2 O)‐ and hyperbaric oxygen (HBO 2 )‐induced antinociception in mice

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Dupic ◽  
Yangmiao Zhang ◽  
Donald Y. Shirachi ◽  
Raymond M. Quock
1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 4416-4422
Author(s):  
A C Miller ◽  
J Gafner ◽  
E P Clark ◽  
D Samid

Alterations in intracellular glutathione (GSH) content are known to affect intrinsic responses to ionizing radiation. More recently, it became apparent that radiation responses may depend also on the expression of specific oncogenes, including ras. These findings, suggesting a possible link between GSH and ras, led us to examine the effect of various GSH modulators on ras expression. Treatment of c-Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells with L-buthionine S'R'-sulfoximine, dimethylfumarate, or N',N'-1,3-bis(trans-4-hydroxycyclohexyl)-N'-nitrosourea resulted in dose- and time-dependent reduction in ras mRNA steady-state levels followed by a decrease in ras-encoded p21 protein production. The effect on ras correlated with the extent of GSH decline, was common to different members of the ras family, and was independent of the mode of oncogene activation or cell phenotype. Indeed, similar drug effects were observed with murine cells in which overexpression of the c-Ha-ras proto-oncogene was due to transcriptional activation (PR4, nontumorigenic) or gene amplification (NIH 136, tumorigenic) and with malignant cells expressing a mutated Ha-ras (RS504). Moreover, N-ras, EJras, and Ki-ras in human tumor cells were similarly affected. Molecular analysis revealed a significant decrease in ras mRNA half-life in cells subjected to GSH inhibition, an effect that required de novo protein synthesis, but there was no change in the rate of gene transcription. These results indicate that pharmacological manipulation of cellular GSH content can down-regulate ras expression at the posttranscriptional level by destabilizing ras transcripts. The potential clinical implications are discussed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 288 (3) ◽  
pp. R692-R701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl J. Kaiyala ◽  
Douglas S. Ramsay

Studies using core temperature (Tc) have contributed greatly to theoretical explanations of drug tolerance and its relationship to key features of addiction, including dependence, withdrawal, and relapse. Many theoretical accounts of tolerance propose that a given drug-induced psychobiological disturbance elicits opponent responses that contribute to tolerance development. This proposal and its theoretical extensions (e.g., conditioning as a mechanism of chronic tolerance) have been inferred from dependent variables, such as Tc, which represent the summation of multiple underlying determinants. Direct measurements of determinants could increase the understanding of opponent processes in tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal. The proximal determinants of Tc are metabolic heat production (HP) and heat loss (HL). We developed a novel system for simultaneously quantifying HP (indirect calorimetry), HL (direct gradient layer calorimetry), and Tc (telemetry) during steady-state administrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), an inhalant with abuse potential that has been previously used to study acute and chronic tolerance development to its hypothermia-inducing property. Rats were administered 60% N2O ( n = 18) or placebo gas ( n = 16) for 5 h after a 2-h placebo baseline exposure. On average, N2O rapidly but transiently lowered HP and increased HL, each by ∼16% ( P < 0.001). On average, rats reestablished and maintained thermal equilibrium (HP = HL) at a hypothermic Tc (−1.6°C). However, some rats entered positive heat balance (HP > HL) after becoming hypothermic such that acute tolerance developed, i.e., Tc rose despite continued drug administration. This work is the first to directly quantify the thermal determinants of Tc during administration of a drug of abuse and establishes a new paradigm for studying opponent processes involved in acute and chronic hypothermic tolerance development.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlyn C Zylstra ◽  
Yusuke Ohgami ◽  
Eunhee Chung ◽  
Donald Y Shirachi ◽  
Raymond M Quock

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 4416-4422 ◽  
Author(s):  
A C Miller ◽  
J Gafner ◽  
E P Clark ◽  
D Samid

Alterations in intracellular glutathione (GSH) content are known to affect intrinsic responses to ionizing radiation. More recently, it became apparent that radiation responses may depend also on the expression of specific oncogenes, including ras. These findings, suggesting a possible link between GSH and ras, led us to examine the effect of various GSH modulators on ras expression. Treatment of c-Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells with L-buthionine S'R'-sulfoximine, dimethylfumarate, or N',N'-1,3-bis(trans-4-hydroxycyclohexyl)-N'-nitrosourea resulted in dose- and time-dependent reduction in ras mRNA steady-state levels followed by a decrease in ras-encoded p21 protein production. The effect on ras correlated with the extent of GSH decline, was common to different members of the ras family, and was independent of the mode of oncogene activation or cell phenotype. Indeed, similar drug effects were observed with murine cells in which overexpression of the c-Ha-ras proto-oncogene was due to transcriptional activation (PR4, nontumorigenic) or gene amplification (NIH 136, tumorigenic) and with malignant cells expressing a mutated Ha-ras (RS504). Moreover, N-ras, EJras, and Ki-ras in human tumor cells were similarly affected. Molecular analysis revealed a significant decrease in ras mRNA half-life in cells subjected to GSH inhibition, an effect that required de novo protein synthesis, but there was no change in the rate of gene transcription. These results indicate that pharmacological manipulation of cellular GSH content can down-regulate ras expression at the posttranscriptional level by destabilizing ras transcripts. The potential clinical implications are discussed.


JAMA ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 194 (10) ◽  
pp. 1146-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. F. Foldes
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRUCE K. DIXON
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document