scholarly journals Faculty And Student Perspectives On Formative Feedback And Its Role In Learning

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirstin LaBell ◽  
Jonathan Kibble
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Harris ◽  
Julia Filiplic ◽  
Hema Nookala ◽  
Nicholas Petrelli

 Abstract –Face-to-face peer review was introduced into a third-year engineering course as a mechanism for providing formative feedback on written reports and oral presentations. The design of the peer review exercises are a work-in-progress, and in this paper we present our reflections on the first experience of using peer review in this course. As authors, we are the course lecturer and three students, and so we present our reflections from both instructor and student perspectives. Through our reflections, we identified that peer review was a valuable tool for formative feedback. We suggested that student engagement could be increased by improving the structure how peer review was implemented in the course.  


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 1017-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Bader ◽  
Tony Burner ◽  
Sarah Hoem Iversen ◽  
Zoltan Varga

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Meggs ◽  
Christopher Allen ◽  
Raul A. De La Cruz

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Wagner ◽  
Anita Acai ◽  
Sydney A. McQueen ◽  
Com McCarthy ◽  
Andrew McGuire ◽  
...  

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an assessment framework aimed at improving formative feedback practices in a Canadian orthopaedic postgraduate training program. Methods: Tool development began in 2014 and took place in 4 phases, each building upon the previous and informing the next. The reliability, validity, and educational impact of the tools were assessed on an ongoing basis, and changes were made accordingly. Results: One hundred eighty-two tools were completed and analyzed during the study period. Quantitative results suggested moderate to excellent agreement between raters (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.54-0.93), and an ability of the tools to discriminate between learners at different stages of training (p’s < 0.05). Qualitative data suggested that the tools improved both the quality and quantity of formative feedback given by assessors and had begun to foster a culture change around assessment in the program. Conclusions: The tool development, implementation, and evaluation processes detailed in this article can serve as a model for other training programs to consider as they move towards adopting competency-based approaches and refining current assessment practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document