Room I, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Walking Epidural Analgesia: The effect of Ambulation on Labor Duration and Maternal Outcome 

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (3A) ◽  
pp. A-1069
Author(s):  
Manuel C Vallejo ◽  
Gordon L. Mandell ◽  
Francisco Jaime ◽  
Sandra Makishima ◽  
Sivam Ramanathan
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Vallejo ◽  
G. Mandell ◽  
F. Jaime ◽  
S. Ramanathan

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 857-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel C. Vallejo ◽  
Leonard L. Firestone ◽  
Gordon L. Mandell ◽  
Francisco Jaime ◽  
Sandra Makishima ◽  
...  

Background Ambulatory epidural analgesia (AEA) is a popular choice for labor analgesia because ambulation reportedly increases maternal comfort, increases the intensity of uterine contractions, avoids inferior vena cava compression, facilitates fetal head descent, and relaxes the pelvic musculature, all of which can shorten labor. However, the preponderance of evidence suggests that ambulation during labor is not associated with these benefits. The purpose of this study is to determine whether ambulation with AEA decreases labor duration from the time of epidural insertion to complete cervical dilatation. Methods In this prospective, randomized study, 160 nulliparous women with AFA were randomly assigned to one of two groups: AEA with ambulation and AEA without ambulation. AEA blocks were initiated with 15-20 ml ropivacaine (0.07%) plus 100 microg fentanyl, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.07% ropivacaine plus 2 microg/ml fentanyl at 15-20 ml/h. Maternal measured variables included ambulation time, time from epidural insertion to complete dilatation, stage II duration, pain Visual Analogue Scale scores, and mode of delivery. APGAR scores were recorded at 1 and 5 min. Results are expressed as mean +/- SD or median and analyzed using the t test, chi-square, or the Mann-Whitney test at P < or = 0.05. Results The ambulatory group walked 25.0 +/- 23.3 min, sat upright 40.3 +/- 29.7 min, or both. Time from epidural insertion to complete dilatation was 240.9 +/- 146.1 min in the ambulatory group and 211.9 +/- 133.9 min in the nonambulatory group (P = 0.206). Conclusion Ambulatory epidural analgesia with walking or sitting does not shorten labor duration from the time of epidural insertion to complete cervical dilatation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
P Rani ◽  
TSenthil Kumar ◽  
VR Hemanth Kumar ◽  
Sunita Samal ◽  
S Parthasarathy ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (1A) ◽  
pp. NA-NA
Author(s):  
M. C. Vallejo ◽  
L. L. Firestone ◽  
G. L. Mandell ◽  
F. Jaime ◽  
S. E. Makishima ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 2195-2201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Polónia Valente ◽  
Patrícia Santos ◽  
Tiago Ferraz ◽  
Nuno Montenegro ◽  
Teresa Rodrigues

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. de la Chapelle ◽  
M. Carles ◽  
V. Gleize ◽  
J. Dellamonica ◽  
A. Lallia ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 324-327
Author(s):  
AYESHA ZAHOOR QURESHI ◽  
SHAHID RAO ◽  
SHAZIA SIDDIQUE

Objective: To compare the effects of epidural analgesia and parenteral nalbuphine in labouring women with term pregnancieson feto-maternal outcome. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial Setting: It was carried out in the Labour Room, Nishtar Hospital, MultanPeriod: From June 2009 to December 2009. Material and methods: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided intotwo groups, having 30 patients in each group. Results: In group-A, pain control was much better and satisfactory (VAS=00-1), duration of labourwas slightly prolonged and instrumental delivery was more common. Low Apgar score and birth asphyxia were seen in group-B. No babydeveloped RDS in both groups. Conclusions: Feto-maternal outcome is much better in women having epidural analgesia with bupivacaine ascompared to women having intramascular nalbuphine.


2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-525
Author(s):  
Ignace Sandefo ◽  
Thierry Lebrun ◽  
Bruno Polin ◽  
Dominique Olle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document