INTENSIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY FOR TWO CHILDREN WITH CEREBRAL PALSY

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Braswell ◽  
Anna Benedict ◽  
Corinne Chapman ◽  
Lisa Steed ◽  
Sheree C. York
Author(s):  
Carolina Corsi ◽  
Mariana M. Santos ◽  
Roberta F. C. Moreira ◽  
Adriana N. dos Santos ◽  
Ana C. de Campos ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Braswell Christy ◽  
Corinne G. Chapman ◽  
Patrice Murphy

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcia Andréa Zanon ◽  
Rafael Leite Pacheco ◽  
Carolina de Oliveira Cruz Latorraca ◽  
Ana Luiza Cabrera Martimbianco ◽  
Daniela Vianna Pachito ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess the effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported in accordance to PRISMA Statement. Through a comprehensive literature search we considered all randomized clinical trials that compared neurodevelopmental treatment with conventional physical therapy for children with cerebral palsy. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Table to assess the risk of bias of the included randomized clinical trial, and the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the body of the evidence. Results: We found 3 randomized clinical trials (2 published and 1 ongoing) comprising 66 children. Published randomized clinical trials presented methodological and reporting limitations and only 1 provided data for outcomes of interest. No difference between neurodevelopmental treatment and conventional physical therapy was found for gross motor function (mean difference 1.40; 95% confidence interval –5.47 to 8.27, low certainty evidence). Conclusion: This review found that the effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy are still uncertain. Further studies are required to assess the efficacy and safety of neurodevelopmental treatment for this purpose and until there, current evidence do not support its routinely use in practice. Number of protocol registration in PROSPERO database: CRD42017082817 (available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=82817 ).


2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 229-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan R. Harris ◽  
Lori Roxborough

The purpose of this article was to conduct a systematic review of studies that examined the efficacy and effectiveness of postural control intervention strategies for children with CP. Only physical therapy interventions were included, e.g. adaptive seating devices, ankle foot orthoses, neurodevelopmental treatment. A multifaceted search strategy was employed to identify all potential studies published between 1990 and 2004. The search strategy included electronic databases, reference list scanning, author and citation tracking of relevant studies, and hand searching of pediatric physical therapy journals and conference proceedings. Twelve studies (1991–2004), comprising ten group design studies and two single subject studies, met our inclusion criteria. A variety of age ranges and severity of children with cerebral palsy (n = 132) participated in the studies. The study quality scores ranged from 2 to 7 (total possible range of 0 to 7) with a median score of 5.5 and a mode of 6. As was true in an earlier systematic review on adaptive seating, most of the 12 ‘experimental’ studies published since 1990 that were aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of postural control strategies provided lower levels of evidence, i.e. Sackett Levels III to V. Additional studies with stronger designs are needed to establish that postural control interventions for children with CP are effective.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Nien Chen ◽  
Su-Fen Liao ◽  
Li-Fei Su ◽  
Hsin-Ya Huang ◽  
Chung-Che Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document