LONG-TERM TREATMENT: RISK/BENEFIT RATIO AND THERAPEUTIC OUTCOME

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 178A-179A
Author(s):  
H. KATSCHNIG ◽  
M. AMERING
1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Versiani ◽  
AE Nardi ◽  
I Figueira

SummaryOpen trials with tricyclics, classical monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or lithium in dysthymia yielded a response rate in 45% of subjects. A long-term treatment of dysthymia with 276 patients treated during 4 years with either moclobemide, tranylcypromine or a combination of amitryptiline plus chlordiazepoxide is described. After discontinuation there was a relapse rate of 89.1%. The controlled studies with tricyclics, MAOIs, reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (RIMAs), specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) or benzamides showed that drugs well-tolerated work better in dysthymia, due to the fact that the treatment must be long-term. Sertraline was studied vs placebo or imipramine in primary dysthymia. Moclobemide, imipramine and placebo were also studied in 315 patients. Mean doses were 650 mg/d of moclobemide and 203.2 mg/d of imipramine. Moclobemide and sertraline were both efficacious and well tolerated. In a long term treatment the clinician should assess the risk-benefit ratio. Dysthymic patients are very sensitive to unwanted effects and compliance is a serious issue.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A115-A115 ◽  
Author(s):  
E CALVERT ◽  
L HOUGHTON ◽  
P COOPER ◽  
P WHORWELL

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 424-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica G. Ferrini ◽  
Eliane G. Valente ◽  
Jacob Rajfer ◽  
Nestor F. Gonzalez-Cadavid

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Marel ◽  
Maree Teesson ◽  
Shane Darke ◽  
Katherine Mills ◽  
Joanne Ross ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document