Agreement of Multislice CT Angiography and MR Angiography in Assessing the Degree of Carotid Artery Stenosis in Consideration of Different Methods of Postprocessing

2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 433-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hackl??nder ◽  
Holger Wegner ◽  
Steffen Hoppe ◽  
Anne Danckworth ◽  
Udo Kempkes ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 494-497
Author(s):  
Dragoslav Nenezic ◽  
Slobodan Tanaskovic ◽  
Predrag Gajin ◽  
Nenad Ilijevski ◽  
Goran Vucurevic

Introduction. Multislice CT angiography (CTA) is a noninvasive and quick technique to image carotid artery stenosis, as well as intracerebral vasculature. Modern multidetector CTA produces images with a high resolution of, not only the contrast-filled lumen, but also of the vessel wall and the surrounding soft tissues. Multiple studies have verified the ability of CTA to provide an accurate representation of the degree of carotid stenosis in comparison to digital subtraction angiography, both for moderate and high-grade stenosis. Because of its fast and accurate vessel imaging, CT angiography is increasingly used in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis. Case Outline. A 37-year-old female patient was admitted at the Vascular Surgery Clinic of the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases 'Dedinje', Belgrade, for angiography and endovascular procedure of a high-grade stenosis of the left common carotid artery based on Multislice CT findings brought by the patient. She complained of problems which we considered to be the result of cerebral circulation ischemia. After detailed diagnostic procedures, we concluded that no pathological lesions could be verified either on the left common carotid artery or other supraaortic branches. Therefore, the patient was discharged for further neurological examinations. Conclusion. Although Multislice CTA has many advantages over classical angiography, its validity should be taken with reserve, especially in younger patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2809-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annet Waaijer ◽  
M. Weber ◽  
M. S. van Leeuwen ◽  
J. Kardux ◽  
W. B. Veldhuis ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Z Zhang ◽  
MH Berg ◽  
AEJ Ikonen ◽  
R Vanninen ◽  
HI Manninen

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 868-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Iseda ◽  
S. Nakano ◽  
D. Miyahara ◽  
S. Uchinokura ◽  
T. Goya ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Platzek ◽  
Dominik Sieron ◽  
Philipp Wiggermann ◽  
Michael Laniado

Purpose. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) for carotid artery stenosis evaluation at 3T.Material and Methods. Twenty-three patients (5 f, 18 m; mean age 61 y, age range 45–78 y) with internal carotid artery stenosis detected with ultrasonography were examined on a 3.0T MR system. The MR examination included both 3D TOF MRA and CEMRA of the carotid arteries. MR images were evaluated independently by two board-certified radiologists. Stenosis evaluation was based on a five-point scale. Stenosis grades determined by TOF and CEMRA were compared using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon test. Cohen’s Kappa was used to evaluate interrater reliability.Results. CEMRA detected stenosis in 24 (52%) of 46 carotids evaluated, while TOF detected stenosis in 27 (59%) of 46 carotids. TOF MRA yielded significantly higher results for stenosis grade in comparison to CEMRA (P=0.014). Interrater agreement was very good for both TOF MRA (κ=0.93) and CEMRA (κ=0.93).Conclusion. At 3T, 3D TOF MRA should not be used as replacement for contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries, as it results in significantly higher stenosis grades.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document