Blood pressure responses to low-dose oral ester or intravenous diacid angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. S378
Author(s):  
Robert J. MacFadyen ◽  
Kennedy R. Lees ◽  
John L Reid
1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1242-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter V Dicpinigaitis

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baclofen can suppress the cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, clinical trial of a 4-week course of low-dose oral baclofen (5 mg tid days 1–7, 10 mg tid days 8–28). SUBJECTS: Seven patients with severe, persistent ACE inhibitor-induced cough. SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study participants kept daily diaries monitoring the frequency of cough during and after completion of baclofen therapy. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated diminution of cough after initiation of baclofen. Initial improvement was noted by a mean of 4.0 days (range 3–6), and maximal improvement during treatment was achieved by a mean of 10.7 days (range 5–15). In addition, all subjects demonstrated persistent suppression of cough (range 25–74 d) after discontinuation of the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose oral baclofen therapy caused a prolonged antitussive effect in all subjects without inducing any adverse reactions. Baclofen may offer an alternative to the discontinuation of ACE inhibitor therapy in patients for whom these drugs are required.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1076-1076
Author(s):  
VIVIAN REZNIK ◽  
WILLIAM GRISWOLD ◽  
STANLEY MENDOZA

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are effective at lowering blood pressure in the neonate and the child. However, these drugs, when used for the treatment of hypertension in the premature infant, must be used with caution to avoid the complications that are well documented in the literature. All of the infants described in the article by Perlman and Volpe had extreme hypotension and oligunia. A group of nine infants with renal failure complicating captopril therapy were recently reported from the same institution.


2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (43) ◽  
pp. 1695-1700
Author(s):  
Veronika Szentes ◽  
Gabriella Kovács ◽  
Csaba András Dézsi

Diabetes mellitus as comorbidity is present in 20–25% of patients suffering from high blood pressure. Because simultaneous presence of these two diseases results in a significant increase of cardiovascular risk, various guidelines focus greatly on the anti-hyperintensive treatment of patients with diabetes. Combined drug therapy is usually required to achieve the blood pressure target value of <140/85 mmHg defined for patients with diabetes, which must be based on angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. These can be/must be combined with low dose, primarily thiazid-like diuretics, calcium channel blockers with neutral metabolic effect, and further options include the addition of beta blockers, imidazolin-l-receptor antagonists, or alpha-1-adrenoreceptor blockers. Evidence-based guidelines are obviously present in local practice. Although most of the patients receive angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor+indapamid or angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor+calcium channel blocker combined therapy with favorable metabolic effects, yet the use of angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors containing hidrochlorotiazide having diabetogenic potencial, and angiotensin receptor blocker fixed combinations is still widespread. Similarly, interesting therapeutic practice can be observed with the use of less differentiated beta blockers, where the 3rd generation carvediolol and nebivolol are still in minority. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(43), 1695–1700.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document