Nonverbal Behavior and Alexithymic Traits in Normal Subjects Individual Differences in Encoding Emotions

1996 ◽  
Vol 184 (9) ◽  
pp. 561-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALFONSO TROISI ◽  
ROBERTO DELLE CHIME ◽  
FEDERICO RUSSO ◽  
MARIA ASSUNTA RUSSO ◽  
CRISTINA MOSCO ◽  
...  
1986 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Adams ◽  
N. Chronos ◽  
R. Lane ◽  
A. Guz

1. Normal subjects show wide variability in their sensory scaling of breathlessness for equivalent degrees of ventilatory stimulation and behave ‘characteristically’ irrespective of stimulus type. 2. Observed differences are not explained by physical characteristics, ventilatory sensitivity or pattern of breathing although there is a weak association with the degree of physical fitness. 3. Differences are seen when scaling is performed with reference to both rigidly defined extremes of breathlessness (visual analogue scaling) and a subject's own relative changes in the intensity of this sensation (magnitude estimation). 4. These findings may explain the common observation, in patients with respiratory disease, of dyspnoea out of proportion to the pathophysiological state.


1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES STIFF ◽  
STEVE CORMAN ◽  
BOB KRIZEK ◽  
ERIC SNIDER

1986 ◽  
Vol 71 (s15) ◽  
pp. 21P-21P
Author(s):  
J.D. O'Brien ◽  
D.G. Thompson ◽  
W.R. Burnham ◽  
E. Walker

1998 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 484-486
Author(s):  
Edward J. Federman ◽  
Charles E. Drebing ◽  
Jeffrey I. Zaref ◽  
Godehard Oepen

A deficit in the recognition of facial affect has been well documented in people with schizophrenia. Our 1995 research with normal subjects showed that hemispheric bias for processing facial affect is related to accuracy of recognition of facial affect. We tested whether this relationship holds in a sample of 25 people with schizophrenia who completed tasks of identification of facial affect and chimeric facial affect. Subjects with a left visual-field bias were significantly more accurate in identifying one facial emotion (sad) than were other subjects. Individual differences in hemispheric advantage for processing affect appears to be an important variable related to functional br capacity within different populations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Mundy

Abstract The stereotype of people with autism as unresponsive or uninterested in other people was prominent in the 1980s. However, this view of autism has steadily given way to recognition of important individual differences in the social-emotional development of affected people and a more precise understanding of the possible role social motivation has in their early development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document