Causes and Consequences of Individual Differences in Social Status: New Insights from Research on Nonverbal Behavior, Neuroendocrinology, Health, and Self-Regulatory Goals

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey T. Cheng ◽  
Jessica L. Tracy
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Nonverbal Behavior

Individual Differences and Changes in Nonverbal Behavior

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES STIFF ◽  
STEVE CORMAN ◽  
BOB KRIZEK ◽  
ERIC SNIDER
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Nonverbal Behavior

The Evaluation of Urban Neighbourhoods 1: Perception

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1337-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hourihan
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Multidimensional Scaling ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Residential Location ◽  
Urban Neighbourhoods ◽  
The Social ◽  
High Degree

Studies of residential location have shown that intraurban migrants usually confine their search for a house to areas which they consider suitable and of which they have strong images. Multidimensional scaling was used to examine neighbourhood perception among a sample of residents in Dublin, Ireland. The social status of the neighbourhoods was the most important characteristic perceived, and this was closely related to objective indices of socioeconomic status. The familiarity and housing style of the areas were also considered. There was a high degree of consensus in the perception of these attributes, and individual differences in the importance attached to them were only tenuously related to the characteristics of the respondents. The use of the perceived attributes for the formation of preferences is examined in a second paper.

Organizational Justice and Behavioral Ethics: Promises and Prospects

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Cropanzano ◽  
Jordan H. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Behavioral Ethics ◽  
Justice Research ◽  
Ethics Research ◽  
Instrumental Control ◽  
Moral Convictions

ABSTRACT:Scholars studying organizational justice have been slow to incorporate insights from behavioral ethics research, despite the fields’ conceptual affinities. We maintain that this stems from differences in the paradigmatic approaches taken by scholars in each area. First, justice research historically has assumed that individuals are motivated by a desire for instrumental control of worthwhile outcomes or by a concern with social status, while behavioral ethics has paid more attention to the role of internalized moral convictions and duties. Second, organizational justice researchers have investigated one set of individual differences, behavioral researchers have examined another. Third, justice scholars focus on social identities while behavioral ethics scholars also investigate moral identities. As an impetus to future inquiry, our review attends to contemporary organizational justice research that takes into account concepts derived from behavioral ethics. In so doing we hope to highlight an avenue for integrative scholarship that will further our understanding of organizational justice.

scholarly journals We, Them, and It: Dictator Game Offers Depend on Hierarchical Social Status, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Dominance

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Weiß ◽  
Johannes Rodrigues ◽  
Marko Paelecke ◽  
Johannes Hewig
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Social Dominance ◽  
Multilevel Model ◽  
Social Dominance Orientation ◽  
Dictator Game ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Lower Status ◽  
The Relationship

We investigated the influence of social status on behavior in a modified dictator game (DG). Since the DG contains an inherent dominance gradient, we examined the relationship between dictator decisions and recipient status, which was operationalized by three social identities and an artificial intelligence (AI). Additionally, we examined the predictive value of social dominance orientation (SDO) on the behavior of dictators toward the different social and non-social hierarchical recipients. A multilevel model analysis showed that recipients with the same status as the dictator benefited the most and the artificial intelligence the least. Furthermore, SDO, regardless of social status, predicted behavior toward recipients in such a way that higher dominance was associated with lower dictator offers. In summary, participants treated other persons of higher and lower status equally, those of equal status better and, above all, an algorithm worst. The large proportion of female participants and the limited variance of SDO should be taken into account with regard to the results of individual differences in SDO.

Nonverbal Behavior and Alexithymic Traits in Normal Subjects Individual Differences in Encoding Emotions

1996 ◽  
Vol 184 (9) ◽  
pp. 561-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALFONSO TROISI ◽  
ROBERTO DELLE CHIME ◽  
FEDERICO RUSSO ◽  
MARIA ASSUNTA RUSSO ◽  
CRISTINA MOSCO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Nonverbal Behavior ◽  
Normal Subjects

The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Economic Beliefs ◽  
Existing Data

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document