Comparison of a traditional and unit dose drug distribution system in a nursing home

1972 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
H. K. Crawley ◽  
F. M. Eckel ◽  
D. C. McLeod
1971 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 166-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry K. Crawley ◽  
Fred M. Eckel ◽  
Don C. McLeod

1976 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Farner ◽  
Charles I. Hicks

This investigation involves the impact of unit dose drug distribution systems upon nursing time involvement in medication related activities. Medication related activities included inventory and control, controlled substance activities, Kardex preparation, medication preparation, medication administration, and charting fulfillment. Two unit dose systems, one with a twenty-four hour medication supply and the other with a seventy-two hour medication supply were compared with a traditional drug distribution system using the time-motion study technique of work sampling. The traditional, twenty-four hour unit dose, and seventy-two hour unit dose required, respectively 3.22, 1.91, and 1.07 minutes per dose administered. The study found, using analysis of variance and t-tests, significant differences between the traditional and unit dose systems. The unit dose drug distribution systems significantly reduced nursing time involvement in controlled substance activities, medication preparation, medication administration, charting fulfillment, and total involvement in the medication cycle. Also, unit dose drug distribution systems might reduce nursing time involvement in inventory and controlled activities. In this study, the traditional system had an in-house pharmacy which assumed many inventory and control functions of the nurse that community pharmacies could not do under a traditional drug distribution system. Significant differences exist between unit dose drug distribution systems as shown in this study. Before implementing any unit dose drug distribution system, the pharmacist, nursing home administrator and director of nursing should examine the impact of any unit dose drug distribution system upon the medication cycle in their nursing home to maximize the benefits of unit dose drug distribution systems.


1978 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
Mitchell H. Rechson ◽  
Terry Irgens ◽  
Franz Peterson ◽  
Fred Wachal

Author(s):  
Mohammad Eslami Jouybari ◽  
Fatemeh Izadpanah ◽  
Mina Amini

Background: Medical errors are one of the most common threats to patient safety. Medication errors have several consequences, including the increase in patients’ mortality, length of stay, and healthcare costs. Objectives: This study was conducted in Food and Drug Deputy of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (MAZUMS) to evaluate medication errors. Methods: This study was conducted by the Food and Drug Deputy of Mazandaran University on medication errors reported and received from affiliated hospitals during 2015-2018. The analysis was performed based on the cause of the error, the frequency of the drugs, routs of administration, and the type. Results: Out of 3033 reported cases, the results of data analysis indicated that the highest percentage of these errors was related to antibiotics (22.84%). According to the results, the most common type of error belonged to the incorrect drug (44.18%), incorrect dose (25.65%), and drug omission (16.68%). The most common cause of the errors was related to neglect and insufficient care by the medical team (38.24%) and no or incorrect mention of the details of prescribed medications (in Kardex, HIS, etc.) by nurses (14.96%). Conclusion: Regular in-hospital training for medical staff focused on teaching the standards required for the administration and use of various medications, and identification of common medication errors can prepare guidelines to reduce these errors in hospitals. Besides, providing measures such as electronic prescription and medication systems based on a unit-dose drug distribution system can also help reduce medication errors.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A107.1-A107
Author(s):  
EG Fernández López ◽  
MA Ocaña Gomez ◽  
I Plasencia Garcia ◽  
M Suarez Gonzalez ◽  
JA de Leon Gil ◽  
...  

1968 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 239-247
Author(s):  
J. Richard Simon ◽  
Richard P. LeMay ◽  
William W. Tester

Open Medicine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-179
Author(s):  
Karin Vasic ◽  
Zorica Jovic ◽  
Gordana Pesic

AbstractThe aim of the study was to test a new model of drug distribution known as unit-dose drug distribution including the effects of implementing this system on total drug consumption, especially in curbing antimicrobial use.The study was carried out in the Department of Surgery at the University Clinical Center in Nis, Serbia. During the first six months of the study (comparative period), drugs were delivered directly from the pharmacy to the urology and orthopedic wards in the traditional way (ward stock system). During the next six months (study period), drugs were delivered directly from the pharmacy to the patients (unit-dose drug distribution system). Drug consumption was measured using the statistical unit defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days according to the anatomical-therapeutic-chemical classification of drugs. Following implementation of the unit-dose drug distribution system, total drug consumption was reduced by 24.34% in the urology ward and by 21.43% in the orthopedic ward. During the comparative period, in the urology and orthopedic wards, systemic antiinfectives (group J) comprised 263.54 and 227.61 DDD/100 bed days or 43.05% and 25.52% of total drug consumption respectively, whereas, during the pilot study period this group of drugs comprised 191.63 and 173.52 DDD/100 bed days or 41.37% and 24.96% of total drug consumption respectively.The unit-dose distribution system of drugs in hospitals leads to a control of drug consumption and substantial savings. Also, the pharmacist-physician interaction began to emerge as an important factor as a direct result of the changes in the drug distribution system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document