Movement and Rotation of Soft Contact Lenses. Effect of Fit and Lens Design

1980 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALAN TOMLINSON ◽  
MALCOLM M. BIBBY
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242243
Author(s):  
Tamsin Doll ◽  
Joshua Moore ◽  
Ahmad H. Shihab ◽  
Bernardo T. Lopes ◽  
Ashkan Eliasy ◽  
...  

Purpose This study investigates how both the peripheral zone design and corneal shape affect the behaviour of soft contact lenses on-eye. Methods In this study, soft contact lenses of varying nominal cylindrical powers and peripheral zone designs—a single-prism gravity-based stabilised lens (G1P), two-prism blink-based stabilised lens (B2P) and four-prism blink-based stabilised lens (B4P)—were generated as finite element models. The on-eye simulation results were analysed to identify the impact of each peripheral zone design (Each with different volume ratios) on the effective power change (EPC) when worn by a subject. Topographies of three eyes of varying average simulated anterior corneal curvature (flat, average & steep) were used in this study. Results The volume of the lens’s peripheral zone as a ratio of the total lens volume (Vp) recorded very weak correlations with the effective power change (EPC) among the three investigated designs when they were fitted to the flat eye (R = -0.19, -0.15 & -0.22 respectively), moderate correlations with the average eye (R = 0.42, 0.43 & 0.43 respectively) and strong correlations with the steep eye (R = 0.91, 0.9 & 0.9 respectively). No significant differences were noticed among the three investigated designs and none of the cylindrical lenses designed with axis 90° recorded EPC values outside the acceptance criteria range (ACR) of ±0.25 D. No significant differences in EPC were recorded among the three designs G1P, B2P and B4P (p>0.6) when they were designed with three axes at 90°, 45° and 0°. Moving the toric lens axis away from 90° dragged the EPC to the negative side and most of the investigated lenses with axes at 45° and 0° recorded EPCs outside the ±0.25D range. Conclusions In all cases, the shape of the cornea had a more dominant effect on EPC when compared to the peripheral zone design. Corneal shape influences the soft toric contact lens’s on-eye power change more than the lens design.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 46-50
Author(s):  
N. Pasechnikova ◽  
◽  
G. Drozhzhina ◽  
O. Ivanova ◽  
I. Nasinnik ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 117-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.N. Safonova ◽  
◽  
I.A. Novikov ◽  
V.I. Boev ◽  
O.V. Gladkova ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 548-554
Author(s):  
Nir Erdinest ◽  
Naomi London ◽  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Yair Morad

The goal of this retrospective case series is to demonstrate the effectivity of combination low-dose atropine therapy with peripheral defocus, double concentric circle design with a center distance soft contact lenses at controlling myopia progression over 1 year of treatment. Included in this series are 3 female children aged 8–10 years with progressing myopia averaging −4.37 ± 0.88 D at the beginning of treatment. Their average annual myopic progression during the 3 years prior to therapy was 1.12 ± 0.75 D. They had not attempted any myopia control treatments prior to this therapy. The children were treated with a combination of 0.01% atropine therapy with spherical peripheral defocus daily replacement soft lenses MiSight<sup>®</sup> 1 day (Cooper Vision, Phoenix, AZ, USA). They underwent cycloplegic refraction, and a slit-lamp evaluation every 6 months which confirmed no adverse reactions or staining was present. Each of the 3 children exhibited an average of 0.25 ± 0.25 D of myopia progression at the end of 1 year of treatment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first published study exhibiting that combining low-dose atropine and peripheral defocus soft contact lenses is effective at controlling children’s moderate to severe myopia progression during 1 year of therapy.


1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Bachman ◽  
Bruce C. Leibrecht ◽  
John K. Crosley ◽  
Dudley R. Price ◽  
Patrick M. Leas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document