A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY OF PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER STATUS AMONG CHILDREN PRESENTING TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH ACUTE ASTHMA

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Timothy G. Ferris ◽  
Ellen F. Crain ◽  
Emily Oken ◽  
Prescott G. Woodruff ◽  
Carlos A. Camargo
2001 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Emerman ◽  
Rita K. Cydulka ◽  
Ellen F. Crain ◽  
Brian H. Rowe ◽  
Michael S. Radeos ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Emerman ◽  
Prescott G. Woodruff ◽  
Rita K. Cydulka ◽  
Michael A. Gibbs ◽  
Charles V. Pollack ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 690-693
Author(s):  
Marissa A. Hendrickson ◽  
Eta Obeya ◽  
Andrew R. Wey ◽  
Philippe R. Gaillard

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Meurer ◽  
Mackenzie Dinh ◽  
Kelley Kidwell ◽  
Adam Flood ◽  
Emily Champoux ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of mortality in the United States. The Emergency Department represents an underutilized opportunity to impact difficult-to-reach populations. There are 136 million visits to the Emergency Department each year and nearly all have at least one blood pressure measured and recorded. Additionally, an increasing number of African Americans and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients are overrepresented in the Emergency Department patient population. In the age of electronic health records and mobile health, the Emergency Department has the potential to become an integral partner in chronic disease management. The electronic health records in conjunction with mobile health behavior interventions can be leveraged to identify hypertensive patients to impact otherwise unreached populations. Methods: Reach Out is a factorial trial studying multicomponent, behavioral interventions to reduce blood pressure in the Emergency Department patient population. Potential participants are identified by automated alerts from the electronic health record and, following consent, receive a blood pressure cuff to take home. During the initial screening phase, they are prompted to submit weekly blood pressure readings. Responders with persistent hypertension are then randomized into one of three component arms, consisting of varying intensity levels: (1) healthy behavior text messaging (daily vs. none), (2) blood pressure self-monitoring (daily vs. weekly), and (3) facilitated primary care provider appointment scheduling and transportation (yes vs. no). If participants are randomized to receive facilitated primary care provider appointment scheduling and are not established with a primary care provider, care will be established at a local Federally Qualified Health Center. Participants are followed for twelve-months. Discussion: The Reach Out study is designed to determine which behavioral intervention components or ‘dose’ of components contributes to a reduction in systolic blood pressure after one year (Aim 1). The study will also assess the effect of primary care provider appointment assistance on total primary care follow-up visits of hypertensive patients treated in an urban, safety net Emergency Department (Aim 2). Ideally, the Reach Out system will contribute to hypertension management, serving as a model for safety net hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers to improve chronic disease management in underserved communities. Trial Registration: This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03422718. The record was first available to the public on 01/30/2018 prior to the enrollment of patients on 03/25/2019. KEYWORDS Hypertension, Emergency Medicine, Randomized Clinical Trial, Multiphase Optimization Strategy


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 532-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Camargo ◽  
Caitlin R. Reed ◽  
Adit A. Ginde ◽  
Sunday Clark ◽  
Stephen D. Emond ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272091028
Author(s):  
Cyndi Gilmer ◽  
Kristy Buccieri

Objective: To determine how accessible health care services are for people who are experiencing homelessness and to understand from their perspectives what impact clinician bias has on the treatment they receive. Methods: Narrative interviews were conducted with 53 homeless/vulnerably housed individuals in Ontario, Canada. Visit history records were subsequently reviewed at 2 local hospitals, for 52 of the interview participants. Results: Of the 53 participants only 28% had a primary care provider in town, an additional 40% had a provider in another town, and 32% had no access to a primary care provider at all. A subset of the individuals were frequent emergency department users, with 15% accounting for 75% of the identified hospital visits, primarily seeking treatment for mental illness, pain, and addictions. When seeking primary care for these 3 issues participants felt medication was overprescribed. Conversely, in emergency care settings participants felt prejudged by clinicians as being drug-seekers. Participants believed they received poor quality care or were denied care for mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions when clinicians were aware of their housing status. Conclusion: Mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions issues were believed by participants to be poorly treated due to clinician bias at the primary, emergency, and acute care levels. Increased access to primary care in the community could better serve this marginalized population and decrease emergency department visits but must be implemented in a way that respects the rights and dignity of this patient population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document