Video-consultation in the Emergency Department: An Assessment of the Potential Benefit for a UK District General Hospital (Preprint)

BACKGROUND DGH Emergency department referrals to a tertiary centre depend on information available from a ‘generalist’ clinician in discussion with a specialist team. If there is uncertainty, the lowest risk strategy is often to transfer the patient. Video consultation allowing the specialist team to see and talk to the patient whilst still in the Emergency department could improve decision making about patient transfer. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the potential benefit of real time video consultation between remote specialist and Emergency department patient across all specialities. METHODS Detailed patient data was collected prospectively for 6 months on all patients presenting to a DGH Emergency department who required input from a specialist team in the nearest tertiary centre. These patients were discussed retrospectively with the specialist teams to determine whether video conferencing could have benefited the patient’s management. The logistics for use of videoconferencing were explored. RESULTS 18,799 patients were seen in the Emergency department during the study period. 413 referrals were made to the tertiary centre specialist teams. Review of patients transferred indicated 193 might have benefited from video consultation. If the specialist team could be accessed via video conferencing only whilst a senior member was available in hospital (0800-2200hr) then a maximum of only 5 patients per week across all specialities would use the equipment. If 24hr specialist access was available this would increase to 7 patients per week. CONCLUSIONS Video consultation between emergency department patient and specialist has limited potential to improve patient management.

The effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on neurospine surgery practice in the referral center hospital developing country

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic represents a once in a century challenge to human health care with over 4.5 million cases and over 300,000 deaths thus far. Surgical practice has been significantly impacted with all specialties writing guidelines for how to manage during this crisis. This study reported the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the neurosurgical practice, especially neurospine, in the outpatient visit, emergency department, and the surgical procedure. Methods: This study is the comparative retrospective about neurospine practice in the outpatient visit, emergency department, and the surgical procedure among before and during COVID-19 pandemic. We recorded data from January to December 2019 (before COVID-19 pandemic) and compared with the same period in the 2020 (during a COVID-19 pandemic). Results: A total of the outpatient visits, the average number per month was 28 ± 10.5 visits per month before the pandemic. The average number outpatient visit per month during the pandemic was 19 ± 11.1 visits per month, with the lowest in July 2020. The result of the average monthly neurospine surgical procedure before the pandemic was 5 ± 1.9 operations per month. Compared during the pandemic, there was decreased in the neurospine surgical procedure with the average number was 2 ± 2.7 operations per month. The decreased number significantly happens in the surgical procedure and emergency department patient (P < 0.05), while in the outpatient visit, the decreased statistically not significantly (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic changed all scopes of medical practice and training. Considering the limitation in the available resources, the number of educational cases may decrease in subspecialized disciplines such as neurospine neurosurgery. The COVID-19 pandemic affects in the neurospine and neurosurgery treatment policy in the referral tertiary hospital.

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Recruiting Latinos in Decídetexto—A Smoking Cessation Clinical Trial from an Emergency Department Patient Registry

There is an underrepresentation of Latinos in smoking cessation clinical trials. This study describes the feasibility and effectiveness of recruiting Latino smokers in the U.S. from an emergency department (ED) patient registry into a randomized smoking cessation clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from the Hackensack University Medical Center ED. Potential participants were contacted from a patient registry. The primary outcome was whether the participant responded to a call or text. Secondary outcomes included the best day of the week, week of the month, and time of day to obtain a response. Of the 1680 potential participants, 1132 were called (67.5%), while 548 (32.5%) were texted. For calls, response rate was higher compared to text (26.4% vs 6.4%; p < 0.001). More participants were interested in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (11.4% vs. 1.8%) and more participants were enrolled in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (1.1% vs. 0.2%). Regression models showed that ethnicity, age, time of day, and week of the month were not significantly associated with response rates. Recruitment of Latinos from an ED patient registry into a smoking cessation clinical trial is feasible using call and text, although enrollment may be low.