EXTENDING HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH PROTECTIONS: A PROPOSED BAN ON PUBLICATION OF TRANSPLANTATION RESEARCH AND USE OF DATA INVOLVING EXECUTED PRISONERS

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
M. Valapour ◽  
A. Bodin
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Research Protections

scholarly journals Analysis of Faculty Knowledge of Human Subjects Protections in Research

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Anissa Ybarra ◽  
Lori Kupczynski ◽  
Marie-Anne Mundy ◽  
Stephen D. Oller
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Human Subjects Research ◽  
Faculty Knowledge ◽  
Research Protections ◽  
Faculty Experience

Institutions of higher education are continually engaging in human subject research at the faculty and student level. It is extremely important that all research involving human subjects is in compliance with the UnitedInstitutions of higher education are continually engaging in human subject research at the faculty and student level. It is extremely important that all research involving human subjects is in compliance with the United States (U.S.) Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects. If faculty and students are not following the guidelines for the ethical conduct of human subject research, their institution will be at risk of losing any federal funding acquired through these studies and risk the possibility of having all research shut down. The lack of faculty knowledge in the area of human subjects research protections has been considered non-compliance for human subjects research. The purpose of this study was to determine if a significant relationship exists between the areas of faculty research experience in higher education and knowledge of the Total Governing Principles of U.S. Codes and Regulations. The study sought to find if faculty experience in research could predict their knowledge of human subjects research protections. In order to test each hypothesis, two statistical tests were conducted. A Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) was utilized as well as a One-Way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Findings indicated that there is no statistical significance between the amount of faculty experience in research and their knowledge of the U.S. Codes and Regulations for human subjects research protections. States (U.S.) Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Research Subjects. If faculty and students are not following the guidelines for the ethical conduct of human subject research, their institution will be at risk of losing any federal funding acquired through these studies and risk the possibility of having all research shut down. The lack of faculty knowledge in the area of human subjects research protections has been considered non-compliance for human subjects research. The purpose of this study was to determine if a significant relationship exists between the areas of faculty research experience in higher education and knowledge of the Total Governing Principles of human subjects research protections U.S. Codes and Regulations. The study sought to find if faculty’s experience in research could predict their knowledge of human subjects research protections. In order to test each hypothesis, two statistical tests were conducted. A Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) was utilized as well as a One-Way Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). Findings indicated that there is no statistical significance between the amount of faculty experience in research and their knowledge of the U.S. Codes and Regulations for human subjects research protections. 

Ethical Principles in Human Subject Research

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 473-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula L Knudson ◽  
Executive Coordinator
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Human Subject Research

An Introduction to Educational Research

2012 ◽  
pp. 319-340
Author(s):  
Tim Dedeaux
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Action Research ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Educational Research ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Academic Field ◽  
Data Collection And Analysis

Within the field of educational research, there are several methods, approaches, and concerns a potential researcher must be made aware of. This chapter serves as an introduction to the process of educational research, and as such, is intended for novice researchers seeking to gain an overview of the process of envisioning, designing, and carrying out a successful research project. Further, this chapter addresses the kinds of research that are possible within the academic field, some of the ethical and practical considerations involved in human subject research, and best methodological practices. Four major methods of research are discussed: qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, and action research. Each method is provided with information on the subtypes of research within each area, appropriate methods of data collection and analysis, and acceptable formats for reporting results for each methodological type.

Human Subject Research for Engineers

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost C.F. de Winter ◽  
Dimitra Dodou
Keyword(s):  
Human Subject ◽  
Human Subject Research

Vulnerability as a Regulatory Category in Human Subject Research

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl H. Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Research Ethics ◽  
Human Subject ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Human Subject Research ◽  
Human Subject Protection ◽  
Research Ethics Review ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Research Regulations ◽  
Vulnerable Subjects ◽  
The Common

The concept of vulnerability has long played a central role in discussions of research ethics. In addition to its rhetorical use, vulnerability has become a term of art in U.S. and international research regulations and guidelines, many of which contain specific provisions applicable to research with vulnerable subjects. Yet, despite the frequency with which the term vulnerability is used, little consensus exists on what it actually means in the context of human subject protection or, more importantly, on how a finding of vulnerability should affect the process of research ethics review.The Common Rule, the centerpiece of the U.S. human subject protection regulations, uses the word vulnerable three times. First, it provides that institutional review boards (IRBs) that regularly review research involving a vulnerable category of subjects should consider including one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document