Examining Diabetes Health Benefits in Health Plans of Large Employers

2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S30-S35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clay Cooksey ◽  
Andrew P. Lanza
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Adam Atherly ◽  
Curtis Florence ◽  
Kenneth E. Thorpe

This paper examines factors associated with switching health plans in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. Switching plans is not uncommon, with 12% of members switching plans annually. Individuals switch out of plans with premium increases and benefit decreases relative to other plans in the market. Switching is negatively associated with age due to increasing switching costs associated with age rather than decreasing premium sensitivity. Individuals in preferred provider organizations are less likely to switch, but are more responsive to premium increases than those in the managed care sector. Those who do switch plans are likely to switch to a different plan in the same sector.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 237802311879850
Author(s):  
Ken-Hou Lin ◽  
Samuel Bondurant ◽  
Andrew Messamore

The decline of employment-based health plans is commonly attributed to rising premium costs. Using restricted data and a matched sample from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Insurance Component, the authors extend previous studies by testing the relationships among premium costs, employment relationships, and the provision of health benefits between 1999 and 2012. The authors report that both establishment- and state-level union densities are associated with a higher likelihood of employers’ providing health plans, whereas right-to-work legislation is associated with lower provision. These factors combined rival rising premium cost in predicting offering. This finding indicates that the declining provision of health benefits could be in part driven by the transformation of the employment relationship in the United States and that labor unions may remain a critical force in sustaining employment-based coverage in the twenty-first century.


2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. SUSAN RIDGELY ◽  
M. AUDREY BURNAM ◽  
COLLEEN L. BARRY ◽  
HOWARD H. GOLDMAN ◽  
KEVIN D. HENNESSY

2003 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Fortney ◽  
Brenda M. Booth ◽  
JoAnn E. Kirchner ◽  
David K. Williams ◽  
Xiaotong Han

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-245
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Reddick

The rhetoric is that the public sector provides broader coverage and more affordability of health benefits to its employees than the private sector. This study examines the reality of public and private health plans. It focuses specifically on the three types of managed care plans: Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO), Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO), and Point-of-Service (POS) plans. An examination of health care benefits is especially important given the double-digit rise in premiums since 2001. This article first focuses on the literature showing differences in health benefits in the public sector compared with the private sector. The literature on the factors that influence choice of managed care plans are also examined. The results reveal that public sector health care costs are slightly higher and fewer plans are offered to its employees. There are fewer alternative health care options, such as high deductible health plans and health savings accounts, as compared with what is offered by the private sector. In addition, the logistic regression results reveal that there are significant differences between the public and private sectors in types of plans offered, controlling for organizational and community factors, characteristics of health care plans, and opinions of human resources (HR) managers on controlling costs.


1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Buck ◽  
Judith L. Teich ◽  
Beth Umland ◽  
Mitchell Stein

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document