Hearing Restoration with Auditory Brainstem Implant in Three Children with Cochlear Nerve Aplasia

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 682-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Colletti ◽  
Marco Carner ◽  
Francesco Fiorino ◽  
Luca Sacchetto ◽  
Veronica Miorelli ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Colletti ◽  
Marco Carner ◽  
Veronica Miorelli ◽  
Maurizio Guida ◽  
Liliana Colletti ◽  
...  

Previous studies have considered only patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) older than 12 years as candidates for an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Our study expands the potential criteria to include both children and adult subjects with other cochlear or cochlear nerve malfunctions who either would not benefit at all from a cochlear implant (eg, cochlear nerve aplasia or avulsion) or whose benefit was or would be severely compromised (eg, cochlear ossification, cochlear fracture). STUDY DESIGN: In our department, over the period from April 1997 to September 2002, 29 patients, 20 adults and 9 children, were fitted with ABIs. Their ages ranged from 14 months to 70 years. Thirteen subjects had tumors, 10 NF2 and 3 solitary vestibular schwannoma, and 16 patients had a variety of nontumor (NT) cochlear or cochlear nerve diseases. A retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach was used in T and a retrosigmoid approach in NT patients. The electrode array was inserted into the lateral recess of the fourth ventricle and correct electrode positioning was monitored with the aid of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). RESULTS: Correct implantation was achieved in all patients. No complications were observed due to implantation surgery or related to ABI activation or long-term use. Auditory sensations were induced in all patients with various numbers of electrodes (from 5 to 15). Different pitch sensations were identifiable with different electrode stimulation. Closed-set word recognition, open-set sentence recognition, and speech tracking scores achieved by the patients are reported in detail. The auditory performance of the patients showed significantly better outcomes than controls (Multicentric European clinical investigations on ABI with NF2). CONCLUSION: We have shown that the indications for the ABI can be extended to include NT patients with severe cochlear and/or cochlear nerve abnormalities. The degree of auditory benefit varies as a function of the underlying pathological conditions, with NT subjects exhibiting significantly better outcomes than the T patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Colletti ◽  
M. Carner ◽  
V. Miorelli ◽  
L. Colletti ◽  
M. Guida ◽  
...  

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Rutherford ◽  
John Thorne ◽  
Andrew King ◽  
Michel Neeff ◽  
Martin O'Driscoll ◽  
...  

Skull Base ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Piccirillo ◽  
Maurizio Guida ◽  
Sean Flanagan ◽  
Lorenzo Lauda ◽  
Paolo Fois ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 216-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Friedmann ◽  
Leena Asfour ◽  
William H. Shapiro ◽  
J. Thomas Roland Jr. ◽  
Susan B. Waltzman

Objective: To assess bimodal auditory performance in children with a cochlear implant (CI) and contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Methods: This is a retrospective case review performed at a tertiary referral center. Four patients with cochlear nerve deficiency initially underwent cochlear implantation but were not benefiting from their devices and underwent ABI in the contralateral ear. The main outcome measures included age-appropriate speech perception and production assessments. Results: Three subjects performed better on their auditory perception assessments using both of their devices than with either device alone. One subject had only preliminary outcomes, but subjectively performed best with both devices. Conclusions: We observed continued improvement in CI performance over time, even if no benefit was evident before the decision for ABI. This could suggest that ABI and CI have a synergistic effect, or it could simply be the adaptive ability of the developing brain to utilize the signals coming from these devices. There is preliminary evidence to support choosing the ear contralateral to the CI for an ABI in a pediatric patient with bilateral cochlear nerve deficiency.


2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vittorio Colletti ◽  
Francesco Fiorino ◽  
Luca Sacchetto ◽  
Veronica Miorelli ◽  
Marco Carner

2015 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-342
Author(s):  
Giacomo Colletti ◽  
Marco Mandalà ◽  
Liliana Colletti ◽  
Vittorio Colletti

Author(s):  
Kiran Natarajan ◽  
Sathiya Murali ◽  
Santhosh Kumar M. ◽  
Manjunatha H. A. ◽  
Adarsh Panicker ◽  
...  

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Cochlear implantation is an established procedure for patients with bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. CI may, in some implantees, have a detrimental impact on vestibular function. Auditory brainstem implantation is a safe and effective procedure in children with bilateral cochlear and cochlear nerve aplasia. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation on the vestibular function.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Three hundred and twenty patients who underwent CI surgery over a four years period from November 2016 to November 2020 were studied for symptoms of vestibular disturbance. Twenty three patients complained of giddiness and underwent vestibular function testing including videooculography, caloric test and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. 48 patients with cochlear and cochlear nerve aplasia underwent ABI surgery from September 2009 to March 2019. The correlation between the size of the flocculus and the presence of vestibular symptoms was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After CI, vestibular disturbances were seen in 23 patients (7.2%) and were transient. In auditory brainstem implantees, vestibular disturbances were seen in eight patients (16.7%) and were found to correlate with the size of the cerebellar flocculus.<strong></strong></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vestibular disturbances are rare after cochlear and auditory brainstem implant surgery. During CI, the preservation of vestibular function should be attempted using minimally invasive techniques. ABI surgery requires meticulous dissection, especially of a large cerebellar flocculus to minimize the possibility of vestibular disturbances.<strong></strong></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document