Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection in Critically Ill Adults

1994 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 361
Author(s):  
DIDIER PITTET ◽  
DEBRA TARARA ◽  
RICHARD P. WENZEL
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S87-S88
Author(s):  
Alex Zimmet ◽  
Matthew Clark ◽  
Shrirang M Gadrey ◽  
Taison Bell ◽  
J Randall Moorman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high mortality rates in critically ill patients but is difficult to identify clinically. This uncertainty results in frequent blood culture testing, which exposes patients to additional costs and the potential harms of unnecessary antibiotics. Accordingly, we aimed to identify signatures in physiological data from critically ill adults that characterize BSI. Methods We reviewed all blood culture, vital sign, laboratory, and cardiorespiratory monitoring (CRM) data from patients admitted to the medical and surgical/trauma ICUs at the University of Virginia Medical Center from February 2011 to June 2015. Blood culture results were categorized as positive, negative, or contaminant. For the BSI population, we included data obtained within 12 hours before or 24 hours after the acquisition of a positive blood culture. The control population included data greater than 12 hours before or 24 hours after the acquisition of a positive blood culture, and all data from patients without BSI. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify the physiological characteristics of BSI. Results We analyzed 9,955 ICU admissions with 144 patient-years of vital sign and CRM data (1.3M hourly measurements). The average age was 59 years; the population was mostly Caucasian (81%) and male (56%). There were 5,671 (57%) admissions with ≥1 blood culture, and 744 (7%) had a BSI. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with BSI was 28% vs. 12% for all others. The physiological signature of BSI was characterized by abnormalities in 12 parameters (Figure 1)—e.g., BSI was more likely in patients with a higher pulse and lower platelets. Several associations were nonlinear—e.g., temperature and WBC had U-shaped relationships with BSI. The internally validated C-statistic was 0.77. Conclusion Statistical modeling revealed a clinically sensible physiological signature of BSI that could assist with bedside decisions regarding the utility of blood culture testing in critically ill adults. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Infection ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. B. Laupland ◽  
H. D. Davies ◽  
D. L. Church ◽  
T. J. Louie ◽  
J. S. Dool ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shawn J. Kram ◽  
Bridgette L. Kram ◽  
Jennifer M. Schultheis ◽  
Michelle M. Kuhrt ◽  
Andrew S. McRae ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To evaluate whether vanA rectal screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) predicts vancomycin resistance for patients with enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large academic medical center. Methods: The predictive performance of a vanA rectal swab was evaluated in 161 critically ill adults with an enterococcal BSI from January 1, 2007, to September 1, 2014, and who had a vanA rectal swab screening obtained within 14 days prior to blood culture. Results: Of the patients meeting inclusion criteria, 83 (51.6%) were vanA swab positive. Rectal-swab–positive patients were more likely to be younger, to be immunocompromised, to have an indwelling central vascular catheter, and to have a history of MDR bacteria. The vanA rectal swab had sensitivity and negative predictive values of 83.6% and 85.9%, respectively, and specificity and positive predictive values of 71.3% and 67.5%, respectively, for predicting a vancomycin-resistant enterococcal BSI in critically ill adults. Conclusions: VanA rectal swabs may be useful for antimicrobial stewardship at institutions with VRE screening already in place for infection control purposes. A higher PPV would be warranted to implement a universal vanA screen on all ICU patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. e0191
Author(s):  
Alex N. Zimmet ◽  
Matthew T. Clark ◽  
Shrirang M. Gadrey ◽  
Taison D. Bell ◽  
Amanda M. Zimmet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document