Double-balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandin E2 for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Y.M. Du ◽  
L.Y. Zhu ◽  
L.N. Cui ◽  
B.H. Jin ◽  
J.L. Ou
Keyword(s):  
Prostaglandin E2 ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Double Balloon

scholarly journals Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiyao Liu ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Xiaoni Zhong ◽  
Rong Ou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Clinical Practices ◽  
Double Balloon ◽  
Balloon Catheters ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Single Balloon

Abstract Background The induction of labour is an increasingly common procedure in the obstetrics field. Various methods have been used to induce labour, among which balloon catheters play an important role. Whether the specifically designed double-balloon catheter is better than the single-balloon device in terms of efficacy, efficiency, safety and patient satisfaction remains controversial. Identifying even small differences between these two devices could be useful to guide clinical practices, to further explore their mechanisms, and to promote a better understanding of the optimal methods for inducing labour. Methods Using the population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study designs (PICOS) principle, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, SCI, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrial.gov, and CDSR databases to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from inception through February 14, 2018. The primary outcome was the caesarean delivery rate, and the secondary outcomes focused on efficacy, efficiency, safety, and patient satisfaction. The relative risks or mean differences, including their 95% confidence intervals, were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models. All statistical analyses were completed with RevMan version 5.3. Results From a total of 1326 articles, 7 RCTs involving 1159 women were included. There were no significant differences in primary outcomes (RR, 0.88 [0.65, 1.2]; p-value, 0.43) or secondary outcomes identified between single- and double-balloon catheters. However, heterogeneity existed for some aspects. Conclusion Both kinds of balloon catheter have similar levels of efficacy, efficiency, safety and patient satisfaction; however, the single-balloon method is considered to be more cost-effective.

scholarly journals Double balloon catheter (+oxytocin) versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for term rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial (RUBAPRO)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Devillard ◽  
Fanny Petillon ◽  
Marion Rouzaire ◽  
Bruno Pereira ◽  
Marie Accoceberry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Double Balloon ◽  
Nulliparous Women

Objective: To demonstrate that a double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin decreases time between induction of labour and delivery (TID) as compared to a vaginal dinoprostone insert in cases of PROM at term. Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: French university hospital Population: Patients undergoing labour induction for PROM at term with unfavorable cervix. Methods: We compared the double balloon catheter over a period of 12 hours with adjunction of oxytocin 6 hours after catheter insertion, versus dinoprostone vaginal insert. After device ablation, cervical ripening continued only with oxytocin. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was TID. Secondary outcomes concerned delivery mode, maternal and fetal outcome and were adjusted for parity. Results: 40 patients per group were randomized. Each group had similar baseline characteristics. The study failed to demonstrate reduced TID (16.2 vs 20.2 hours, ES = 0.16 (-0.27 to 0.60), p=0.12) in catheter group versus dinoprostone except in nulliparous women (17.0 vs 26.5 hours, ES = 0.62 (0.10 to 1.14), p=0.006). The rate of vaginal delivery <24h significantly increased with combined induction (88.5% vs 66.6%, p=0.03). No statistical difference was observed concerning caesarean rate (12.5% vs 17.5%, p>0.05), chorioamnionitis (0% vs 2.5%, p=1), postpartum endometritis, maternal or neonatal outcomes. Procedure-related pain and tolerance to devices were found to be similar for the two methods. Conclusion: The double balloon catheter combined with oxytocin is an alternative for cervical ripening in case of PROM at term, and may reduce TID in nulliparous women.

scholarly journals Induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using double-balloon catheter placement within 12 h versus within 12–24 h

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Peng ◽  
Ruobing Li ◽  
Shuguo Du ◽  
Heng Yin ◽  
Min Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Balloon Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Cervical Dilation ◽  
Double Balloon ◽  
Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestation were enrolled as research subjects, and they underwent the intended termination of pregnancy at our birth centre from January 1, 2017, to June 31, 2019. Based on the duration of DBC, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, the DBC group within 12 h and the DBC group within 12–24 h. Results All 58 cases were successful vaginal deliveries, and no one chose to undergo caesarean section. The success rate of induction (successful abortion of the foetus and placenta without the implementation of dilation and evacuation) was higher in the DBC group within 12–24 h (96.3%, 29/31) than in the DBC group within 12 h (71.0%, 18/27) (p < 0.05). Additionally, the time from DBC removal to delivery in the DBC group within 12–24 h was significantly shorter than that in the DBC group within 12 h (3.0 h versus 17.8 h) (p < 0.05), and the degree of cervical dilation after DBC removal in the DBC group within 12–24 h was larger than that in the DBC group within 12 h (p < 0.05). Conclusion In the clinic, the placement time of DBC generally lasts for approximately 12 h. However, considering that the cervical condition is immature in the mid-trimester, properly extending the placement time of DBC to 24 h will benefit cervical ripening and reduce the chance of dilation and evacuation.

scholarly journals Use of Misoprostol in Pregnancy- A Review Article

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
Syeda Ummay Kulsum ◽  
Sabera Khatun ◽  
SM Shahnawaz Bin Tabib
Keyword(s):  
Prostaglandin E2 ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Tablet Form ◽  
Cytoprotective Agent ◽  
Medicine Today

Prostaglandins are the pharmacological agents used for induction of labour and augmentation of labour. Prostaglandin E2 gel is used for cervical ripening and induction of labour. These are however, costly and need to be stored in a refrigerator at a temperature of 2 - 8°C, half life 18 months. The Tablet form of prostaglandin E2 is not available in Bangladesh. Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin (PG) E1 analogue is used orally for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer and used as a cytoprotective agent. It was first used for labour induction in 1987. Prostaglandin can be used in several gynaecological and obstetric conditions. It can be given through several routes. This article will elaborately delinate the role of misoprostol, a prostaglandin in obstetrics and gynaecological conditions. Medicine Today 2010 Volume 22 Number 02 Page 94-98 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v22i2.12443

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document