Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine and Conventional Local Anesthetic Agents in Regional Anesthesia: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-180
Author(s):  
Z. Jin ◽  
O. Ding ◽  
A. Islam ◽  
R. Li ◽  
J. Lin
Author(s):  
Wesley N. Sivak ◽  
Erica L. Sivak ◽  
Kenneth C. Shestak

Regional anesthesia, or rendering only a targeted part of the body anesthetized, has numerous benefits for both the surgeon and patient. Local anesthetic agents are essential to create and maintain regional blockades, and detailed knowledge of these agents is essential to providing safe and effective care. This chapter begins with review of the basic pharmacology, indications, and contraindications for the use of regional anesthesia. Numerous specific blockades used to anesthetize distinct regions of the body are reviewed with specific focus on anatomy and technique. When safely performed, regional anesthesia can provide an optimal experience for both surgeon and patient.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K Grandhi ◽  
Barbara Perona

Abstract Background Surgery in concert with anesthesia is a key part of the management of advanced-stage cancers. Anesthetic agents such as opioids and volatile anesthetics have been shown to promote recurrence in preclinical models, whereas some animal models have shown that the use of lidocaine may be beneficial in reducing cancer recurrence. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature to highlight the mechanisms of action by which local anesthetics are thought to reduce cancer recurrence. Methods A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed (1966 to 2018) electronic database. Search terms included “lidocaine,” “ropivicaine,” “procaine,” “bupivicaine,” “mepivicaine,” “metastasis,” “cancer recurrence,” “angiogenesis,” and “local anesthetics” in various combinations. The search yielded 146 total abstracts for initial review, 20 of which met criteria for inclusion. Theories for lidocaine’s effect on cancer recurrence were recorded. All studies were reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Results Numerous mechanisms were proposed based on the local anesthetic used and the type of cancer. Mechanisms include those that are centered on endothelial growth factor receptor, voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, transient receptor melanoplastin 7, hyperthermia, cell cycle, and demyelination. Conclusions In vivo models suggest that local anesthetic administration leads to reduced cancer recurrence. The etiology of this effect is likely multifactorial through both inhibition of certain pathways and direct induction of apoptosis, a decrease in tumor migration, and an association with cell cycle–mediated and DNA-mediated effects. Additional research is required to further define the clinical implications.


Author(s):  
Joel Barton ◽  
Gavin Martin

Regional anesthesia can deliver multiple benefits to patients undergoing surgery. However, administering even appropriate doses of local anesthetic agents for regional anesthesia can be life threatening, and the risks must be well understood. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a spectrum or sequence of symptoms and dysfunction that affects the nervous and cardiopulmonary systems. Management of LAST revolves around recognition, supportive care, and, specifically, administration of lipid emulsion. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia practice advisory for management of LAST is an excellent point-of-care reference for anesthesiologists practicing regional anesthesia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-454
Author(s):  
Sujana Dontukurthy ◽  
Joseph D. Tobias

Local anesthetic agents play a key role in the treatment and prevention of pain in children. Although generally safe and effective, as with any pharmacologic agent, adverse effects may occur with the administration of these medications. Systemic absorption or inadvertent systemic injection during bolus dosing or continuous infusion can result in local anesthetic systemic toxicity with life-threatening neurological and cardiac complications. The following article reviews the pharmacology of local anesthetic agents, outlines previous reports of systemic toxicity during regional anesthesia, and discusses prevention and treatment algorithms.


WCET Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Purcell ◽  
Thomas Buckley ◽  
Jennie King ◽  
Wendy Moyle ◽  
Andrea Marshall

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000810
Author(s):  
Christopher McGovern ◽  
Tara Quasim ◽  
Kathryn Puxty ◽  
Martin Shaw ◽  
Wijnand Ng ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPruritus is a common and often distressing complication after a burn injury. The purpose of this review is to explore the efficacy of drugs classically used to treat neuropathic pain in the management of pruritus after burn injury.MethodsA systematic literature search of medical databases was conducted to find studies investigating drugs listed in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline (CG173, “neuropathic pain in adults”) for the management of pruritus after burn injury in patients of any age. Controlled studies were stratified by the drug class studied and their risk of bias before conducting meta-analysis. A narrative review of case series or observational studies was presented. Severity of pruritus at any time point, with all quantitative and qualitative measures, was included.ResultsFifteen studies were included in the final analysis, 10 investigated the use of gabapentinoids, 4 studied doxepin, and 1 local anesthetic agents. Meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that the use of gabapentinoids was associated with an improvement in mean VAS (Visual Analog Scale) 0–10 scores of 2.96 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20 to 4.73, p<0.001) when compared with placebo or antihistamine. A meta-analysis of four RCTs investigating topical doxepin showed an improvement in mean VAS scores of 1.82 (95% CI 0.55 to 3.09, p<0.001). However, when excluding two studies found to be at high risk of bias, no such improvement was found (−0.32, 95% CI −1.64 to –0.99, p=0.83).ConclusionThis study suggests that gabapentinoids are beneficial in the management of burn-related pruritus. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that doxepin is an effective treatment. Topical local anesthetic agents may be safe and beneficial, but studies are scarce.Level of evidenceSystematic review, level II.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document