Results of Thoracoscopic Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Posterior Instrumented Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Undergoing Selective Thoracic Fusion

Spine ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2031-2038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Kit Wong ◽  
Hwan-Tak Hee ◽  
Zhirong Yu ◽  
David Wong
Author(s):  
Sachin Allahabadi ◽  
Hao-Hua Wu ◽  
Sameer Allahabadi ◽  
Tiana Woolridge ◽  
Michael A. Kohn ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine perspectives of surgeons regarding simultaneous surgery in patients undergoing posterior spine instrumentation and fusion (PSIF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods A survey was administered to orthopaedic trainees and faculty regarding simultaneous surgery for primary PSIF for AIS. A five-point Likert scale (1: ‘Strongly Disagree’ to 5: ‘Strongly Agree’) was used to assess agreement with statements about simultaneous surgery. We divided simultaneous surgery into concurrent, when critical portions of operations occur at the same time, and overlapping, when noncritical portions occur at the same time. Results The 72 respondents (78.3% of 92 surveyed) disagreed with concurrent surgery for ‘one of my patients’ (response mean 1.76 (sd 1.03)) but were more accepting of overlapping surgery (mean 3.94 (sd 0.99); p < 0.0001). The rating difference between concurrent and overlapping surgery was smaller for paediatric and spine surgeons (-1.25) than for residents or those who did not identify a subspecialty (-2.17; p = 0.0246) or other subspecialty surgeons (-2.57; p = 0.0026). Respondents were more likely to agree with explicit informed consent for concurrent surgery compared with overlapping (mean 4.32 (sd 0.91) versus 3.44 (sd 1.14); p < 0.001). Conclusion Orthopaedic surgeons disagreed with concurrent but were more accepting of overlapping surgery and anaesthesia for PSIF for AIS. Respondents were in greater agreement that patients should be explicitly informed of concurrence than of overlap. The surgical community’s evidence and position regarding simultaneous surgery, in particular overlapping, must be more effectively presented to the public in order to bridge the gap in perspectives. Level of Evidence IV


Folia Medica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamprini Katranitsa ◽  
Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis ◽  
Stylianos Kapetanakis ◽  
Georgios Charitoudis ◽  
Anastasios Christodoulou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The potential hazards of allogeneic blood transfusion are well established in literature. Few things are known, however, about the results of combining different blood saving techniques and their results in avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) in scoliosis surgery. Aim: To report specific results about utilization of preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) and intraoperative blood-saver (BLDS) in conjunction, aiming to minimize the need for ABT. Materials and methods: Between 1989 and 2012, 107 patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion (PIF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction. Retrospective evaluation was conducted. Patients were classified into two groups, according to the method utilized: group A with only allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) and group B where PABD with BLDS intraoperatively was applied. Hematocrit and hemoglobin values were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at discharge. The variables we examined included also gender, age, levels fused and number of predeposited blood units, required transfused blood units (TBU), as well as ABT rates between the two groups. Results: More than 70% of the transfusions in both groups were needed intraoperatively. In group A, an average of 2.4 units per patient was transfused and ABT reached 76%. In contrast, in group B an average of 4.5 units per patient was transfused but ABT rate was only 7.3%, while the rest 92.7% was autologous blood. However, the wasted autologous blood reached 24.9%. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that PABD with intraoperative cell salvage (CS) is associated with statistically significant ABT rates decrement but the combination of these methods cannot assure ABT avoidance.


Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (23) ◽  
pp. E1368-E1373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Schulz ◽  
Jahangir Asghar ◽  
Tracey Bastrom ◽  
Harry Shufflebarger ◽  
Peter O. Newton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document