scholarly journals 922: EARLY ENOXAPARIN VERSUS UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN FOR SUBMASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 458-458
Author(s):  
Lara Groetzinger ◽  
Ian Barbash ◽  
Phillip Lamberty ◽  
Michael Donahoe ◽  
Roy Smith ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (06) ◽  
pp. 1432-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Meyer ◽  
F Brenot ◽  
G Pacouret ◽  
G Simonneau ◽  
K Gillet Juvin ◽  
...  

SummaryLow-molecular-weight heparins have been extensively investigated in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis but limited data are available concerning their use in pulmonary embolism. In an open, pilot, randomized study, we compare the safety and efficacy of Fragmin, a low-molecular-weight heparin with those of unfractionated heparin in 60 patients with non massive pulmonary embolism (Miller Index < 20). Thirty one patients received unfractionated heparin intravenously and 29 received a fixed dose of 120 Anti-Xa IU/kg of Fragmin administered subcutaneously twice a day for 10 days. There was no pulmonary embolism recurrence nor major bleeding in either group during the treatment period. The decrease in pulmonary vascular obstruction on perfusion lung scan between day 0 and day 10 was 17 ± 13% in the Fragmin group and 16 ± 13% in the heparin group (NS). These results indicate that Fragmin may be a safe and effective treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonika Malik ◽  
◽  
Anju Bhardwaj ◽  
Matthew Eisen ◽  
Sanjay Gandhi ◽  
...  

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality and presents with significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Clinical presentation ranges from mild, nonspecific symptoms to syncope, shock, and sudden death. Patients with hemodynamic instability and/ or signs of right ventricular dysfunction are at high risk for adverse outcomes and may benefit from aggressive therapy and support. Therapeutic anticoagulation is indicated in all patients in the absence of contraindications. Thrombolysis should be strongly considered in selected high- and intermediate-risk patients, either by systemic infusion or percutaneous catheter-directed therapy. Other therapeutic modalities, such as vena cava filters and surgical embolectomy, are options for patients who fail or cannot tolerate anticoagulation and/or thrombolysis. This article reviews the assessment and advanced management options for acute PE with focus on high- and intermediate-risk patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 101598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte C. Goldman ◽  
Christopher P. Dall ◽  
Tamir Sholklapper ◽  
Jacob Brems ◽  
Keith Kowalczyk

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem U. Rehman ◽  
Mohd Iqbal Dar ◽  
Manish Bansal ◽  
R. R. Kasliwal

Abstract Background Acute pulmonary thromboembolism is the most dangerous presentation of venous thromboembolic disease. The role of thrombolysis in massive pulmonary embolism has been studied extensively, but the same is not there for submassive pulmonary embolism. This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of thrombolysis in acute submassive pulmonary embolism. This was a prospective, case-control, observational study. Patients presenting with acute submassive pulmonary embolism were divided into thrombolysis group and control group depending on whether they received thrombolysis plus anticoagulation or anticoagulation only, respectively. Results A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Forty-two patients were in the thrombolysis group, and 44 patients were in the control group. The mean ± SD age in the control and thrombolysis groups was 63.3 ± 14.7 and 56.4 ± 13.8 years, respectively. The two groups were well matched in sex distribution and associated comorbidities like COPD, active surgery, major trauma, and immobilization. On echocardiography, dilated RA/RV in pre-treatment vs. post-treatment was seen in 20 (45.5%) vs. 20 (45.5%) in the control group and 26 (61.9%) vs. 11 (26.2%) in the thrombolysis group. Similarly, RV systolic dysfunction in pre-treatment vs. post-treatment was seen in 24 (54.5%) vs. 21 (47.7%) in the control group and 22 (52.4%) vs. 8 (19.0%) in the thrombolysis group. Pulmonary artery pressure in pre-treatment vs. post-treatment was 64.4 ± 15.0 vs. 45.9 ± 9.9 mmHg in the control group and 68.3 ± 17.4 vs. 31.4 ± 6.9 mmHg in the thrombolysis group. In control vs. thrombolysis group, there were 5 vs. 1 death, 6 vs. 1 hemodynamic decompensation, and 6 vs. 1 patient needing mechanical ventilation. Conclusion Thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism is associated with better right ventricular functions, lower pulmonary artery pressures, and comparable mortality rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document