scholarly journals Incorporating the 2017 critical care pediatric nutrition support guidelines into clinical practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Sharon Y. Irving ◽  
Peggi Guenter ◽  
Nilesh M. Mehta
Nursing ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Sharon Y. Irving ◽  
Peggi Guenter ◽  
Nilesh M. Mehta

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
DK Heyland ◽  
D Schroter-Noppe ◽  
JW Drover ◽  
M Jain ◽  
L Keefe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Twose ◽  
Una Jones ◽  
Gareth Cornell

Introduction Across the United Kingdom, physiotherapy for critical care patients is provided 24 h a day, 7 days per week. There is a national drive to standardise the knowledge and skills of physiotherapists which will support training and reduce variability in clinical practice. Methods A modified Delphi technique using a questionnaire was used. The questionnaire, originally containing 214 items, was completed over three rounds. Items with no consensus were included in later rounds along with any additional items suggested. Results In all, 114 physiotherapists from across the United Kingdom participated in the first round, with 102 and 92 completing rounds 2 and 3, respectively. In total, 224 items were included: 107 were deemed essential as a minimum standard of clinical practice; 83 were not essential and consensus was not reached for 34 items. Analysis/Conclusion This study identified 107 items of knowledge and skills that are essential as a minimum standard for clinical practice by physiotherapists working in United Kingdom critical care units.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 144-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol S. Ireton-Jones ◽  
Coni Francis

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S2
Author(s):  
J.C. Silva ◽  
U.G. Kyle ◽  
M. Treviño ◽  
J.L. Lusk ◽  
G. Dardon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. respcare.08996
Author(s):  
Jie Li ◽  
Meilien Tu ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
Guoqiang Jing ◽  
James B Fink ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert M. Goldman ◽  
Thyyar M. Ravindranath

Critical care decision-making involves principles common to all medical decision-making. However, critical care is a remarkably distinctive form of clinical practice and therefore it may be useful to distinguish those elements particularly important or unique to ICU decision-making. The peculiar contextuality of critical care decision-making may be the best example of these elements. If so, attempts to improve our understanding of ICU decision-making may benefit from a formal analysis of its remarkable contextual nature. Four key elements of the context of critical care decisions can be identified: (1) costs, (2) time constraints, (3) the uncertain status of much clinical data, and (4) the continually changing environment of the ICU setting. These 4 elements comprise the context for the practice of clinical judgment in the ICU. The fact that intensivists are severely constrained by teh context of each case has important ramifications both for practice and for retrospective review. During retrospective review, the contextual nature of ICU judgment may be unfairly neglected by ignoring one or more of the key elements. Such neglect can be avoided if intensivists demand empathetic evaluation from reviewers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document