Boost of RT to Breast Lowers Risk of Relapse in High-Risk Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Charlene Laino
Author(s):  
Juliette Lambert ◽  
Jerome Lambert ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Alice MARCEAU-RENAUT ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Micol ◽  
...  

WT1 overexpression is frequently identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and has been reported as a potential marker for measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring. Here, we evaluated the value of post-induction WT1 MRD level as a prognostic factor, as well as the interaction between post-induction WT1 MRD response and the effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in first complete remission (CR). In the ALFA-0702 trial, AML patients aged 18 to 59 years had a prospective quantification of WT1 MRD. Occurrence of a WT1 MRD ratio >2.5% in bone marrow or >0.5% in peripheral blood was defined as MRDhigh, while ratio under these thresholds was defined as MRDlow. The prognostic value of MRD after induction chemotherapy was assessed in 314 patients in first CR by comparing the risk of relapse, the relapse-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS). Interaction between MRD response and allo-SCT effect was evaluated in patients by comparing the influence of allo-SCT on the outcomes of patients with MRDhigh and MRDlow. We showed that MRDhigh patients after induction had a higher risk of relapse and a shorter RFS and OS. MRD response remained of strong prognostic value in the subset of 225 patients with intermediate/unfavorable-risk AML, eligible for allo-SCT, since MRDhigh patients had a significantly higher risk of relapse resulting in worse RFS and OS. Effect of allo-SCT was higher in MRDlow patients than in MRDhigh patients but not statistically different. Early WT1 MRD response highlight a population of high-risk patients in need of additional therapies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A376-A376
Author(s):  
B JEETSANDHU ◽  
R JAIN ◽  
J SINGH ◽  
M JAIN ◽  
J SHARMA ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 263-263
Author(s):  
Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Florence Jouan ◽  
Pascale Bellaud ◽  
Jacques-Philippe Moulinoux ◽  
Karim Bensalah ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksic ◽  
Luebke ◽  
Brunkwall

Background: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Patients and methods: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, “hostile neck”, recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age ≥ 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. Results: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0,011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0,001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2,9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2,85, 95% CI 1,38-5,91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5,57, 95% CI 2,69-11,55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. Conclusions: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document