1610: High-Risk Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy Today are Less High-Risk than in the Past

2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 436-436
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Kane ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
Christopher L. Amling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
The Past ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3274
Author(s):  
Vinson Wai-Shun Chan ◽  
Wei Shen Tan ◽  
Aqua Asif ◽  
Alexander Ng ◽  
Olayinka Gbolahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Randomised Controlled

External factors, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can lead to cancellations and backlogs of cancer surgeries. The effects of these delays are unclear. This study summarised the evidence surrounding expectant management, delay radical prostatectomy (RP), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) compared to immediate RP. MEDLINE and EMBASE was searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled studies pertaining to the review question. Risks of biases (RoB) were evaluated using the RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A total of 57 studies were included. Meta-analysis of four RCTs found overall survival and cancer-specific survival were significantly worsened amongst intermediate-risk patients undergoing active monitoring, observation, or watchful waiting but not in low- and high-risk patients. Evidence from 33 observational studies comparing delayed RP and immediate RP is contradictory. However, conservative estimates of delays over 5 months, 4 months, and 30 days for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively, have been associated with significantly worse pathological and oncological outcomes in individual studies. In 11 RCTs, a 3-month course of NHT has been shown to improve pathological outcomes in most patients, but its effect on oncological outcomes is apparently limited.

scholarly journals Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela A. Ferraro ◽  
Fabienne Lehner ◽  
Anton S. Becker ◽  
Benedikt Kranzbühler ◽  
Ken Kudura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Preoperative Staging ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Oncological Outcome ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Psma Pet ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has superior sensitivity over conventional imaging (CI) to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and therefore is increasingly used in staging to stratify patients before radical therapy. Whether this improved diagnostic accuracy translates into improved outcome after radical prostatectomy (RPE) has not yet been shown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcome after RPE between patients that underwent preoperative staging with CI or PSMA-PET for intermediate and high-risk PCa. Methods We retrospectively selected all patients that underwent RPE for intermediate- or high-risk PCa at our institution before PSMA-PET introduction (between March 2014 and September 2016) and compared the oncologic outcome of patients staged with PSMA-PET (between October 2016 and October 2018). Oncological pre-surgical risk parameters (age, PSA, D’Amico score, biopsy-ISUP, and cT stage) were compared between the groups. Oncological outcome was determined as PSA persistence, nerve-sparing rate, and surgical margin status. Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher’s, and chi-square tests where used for statistical testing. Results One hundred five patients were included, 53 in the CI group and 52 in the PSMA-group. Patients in the PSMA group had higher ISUP grade (p < 0.001) and D’Amico score (p < 0.05). The rate of free surgical margins and PSA persistence after RPE was 64% and 17% for the CI and 77% and 6% for the PSMA group (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis with high-risk patients revealed PSA persistence in 7% (3/44) in the PSMA group and 25% (7/28) in the CI group (p = 0.04). Limitations include the retrospective design and choline-PET for some patients in the CI group. Conclusion Immediate outcome after RPE was not worse in the PSMA group compared with the CI group, despite a higher-risk cohort. In a comparison of only high-risk patients, PSMA-PET staging was associated with a significantly lower rate of postsurgical PSA persistence.

Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using percent positive biopsies: results from CaPSURE

Urology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary D Grossfeld ◽  
David M Latini ◽  
Deborah P Lubeck ◽  
Jeanette M Broering ◽  
Yu-Ping Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

A validation/evaluation of five postoperative prognostic tools for prostate cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5117-5117
Author(s):  
B. A. Inman ◽  
B. C. Leibovich ◽  
S. A. Siddiqui ◽  
I. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prediction Interval ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Psa Failure ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Risk Patients

5117 Background: Prognostic nomograms, scoring tools, and risk tables are rapidly accumulating in the prostate cancer (PCa) literature. It is not always clear to whom these tools should apply and how well they predict the outcomes they were designed to forecast. There is need for independent evaluation of these tools. Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic Radical Prostatectomy Registry, a prospective database of radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes, to assess tools designed to predict RP outcomes. The validation set included 13,313 RP patients from 1990–2005. There were 3,256 PSA failures, 566 metastases, and 1,599 deaths (301 were due to PCa). We assessed the discrimination, calibration and overall accuracy of prediction tools identified through a structured Pubmed search. Results: Tools varied greatly in terms of complexity, width of prediction interval, and method of presentation. Several tools included non-standard variables and were therefore unevaluable, despite an extensive dataset, leaving the 1999 and 2005 Kattan nomograms, the 1998 and 2001 CDPR scores, and the 2001 GPSM score for analysis. Discrimination (quantitated by the c index) was better for PCa-specific survival and metastases than for PSA failure ( Table ). Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated clustering of risk groups in most tools, most severely in the higher risk groups of the Kattan nomograms. The calibration plots of most tools (excepting GPSM) had a serious discordance between observed and predicted outcomes in the lower probability ranges. This meant that most tools gravely overestimated the probability of RP failure in high-risk patients, by up to 4- fold. Conclusions: The tools showed moderate discriminatory ability for PSA failure but performed much better for non-surrogate outcomes. Most tools (excepting GPSM) were miscalibrated in high risk patients and dramatically underestimated the efficacy of surgery in this cohort. Prognostic tools may not be as accurate as previously reported. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

356 RISK-FACTORS FOR BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE- AND CLINICAL METASTASIS-FREE SURVIVAL IN D'AMICO HIGH-RISK PATIENTS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Becker ◽  
Pierre Tennstedt ◽  
Thomas Steuber ◽  
Georg Salomon ◽  
Alexander Haese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Comparison of Oncological Outcomes Between Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy by Type of Radiotherapy in Elderly Prostate Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Xiao Guo ◽  
Hao-Ran Xia ◽  
Hui-Min Hou ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Jian-Ye Wang
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
The Other ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients

ObjectiveWe aimed compare the oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) with those of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), or EBRT + BT (EBBT) in elderly patients with localised prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsLocalised PCa patients aged ≥70 years who underwent RP, EBRT, BT, or EBBT between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Multivariable competing risks survival analyses were used to estimate prostate cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM). Subgroup analyses according to risk categories were also conducted.ResultsOverall, 14057, 37712, 8383, and 5244 patients aged ≥70 years and treated with RP, EBRT, BT, and EBBT, respectively, were identified. In low- to intermediate-risk patients, there was no significant difference in CSM risk between RP and the other three radiotherapy modalities (all P &gt; 0.05). The corresponding 10-year CSM rates for these patients were 1.2%, 2.3%, 2.0%, and 1.8%, respectively. In high-risk patients, EBRT was associated with a higher CSM than RP (P = 0.003), whereas there was no significant difference between RP and BT or RP and EBBT (all P &gt; 0.05). The 10-year CSM rates of high-risk patients in the RP, EBRT, BT, and EBBT groups were 7.5%, 10.2%, 8.3%, and 7.6%, respectively. Regarding OCM, the risk was generally lower in RP than in the other three radiotherapy modalities (all P &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsAmong men aged ≥70 years with localised PCa, EBRT, BT, and EBBT offer cancer-specific outcomes similar to those of RP for individuals with low- to intermediate-risk disease. In patients with high-risk disease, EBBT had outcomes equally favourable to those of RP, but RP is more beneficial than EBRT. More high-quality trials are warranted to confirm and expand the present findings.

Impact of different definitions of high-risk prostate cancer on survival after radical prostatectomy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 113-113
Author(s):  
Kenneth Gerard Nepple ◽  
Gurdarshan S Sandhu ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Seth A. Strope ◽  
Robert L. Grubb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Patients

113 Background: Multiple definitions of high risk prostate cancer exist. Studies have primarily correlated these definitions with biochemical recurrence and not with survival. We applied six previously described high risk definitions to men treated with radical prostatectomy and evaluated their ability to predict survival outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort. Methods: The study population included 6477 men treated with radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2005 and followed for a median of 67 months. The six high risk definitions were 1) preoperative PSA≥20ng/ml, 2) biopsy Gleason score 8-10, 3) clinical stage≥T2c, 4) clinical stage T3, 5) D’Amico definition, or 6) National Comprehensive Cancer Network definition. Survival was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method to generate unadjusted prostate cancer survival estimates. To control for the competing risks of age and comorbidity, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio for prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in high risk patients compared to low/intermediate risk. Results: High risk patients comprised between 0.7% (cT3) and 8.2% (D’Amico) of the study population. The 10-year Kaplan Meier prostate cancer survival estimates varied from 89.7% for PSA≥20 to 69.7% for cT3. On multivariable analysis controlling for age and comorbidity, high risk prostate cancer (of all definitions) had an increased risk of PCSM compared to low/intermediate risk with a hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 4.38 for PSA≥20 to 19.97 for cT3 (all p<0.0001). For OM, again controlling for age and comorbidity, high risk patients of all definitions except preoperative PSA≥20 (HR=0.98, p=0.99) were associated with increased risk of OM (HR range: 1.72 for D’Amico, 1.73 for stage≥T2c, 1.88 for NCCN, 2.63 for Gleason 8-10, 3.31 for cT3; all p<0.01). Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of men with high risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, the majority of men experienced long term prostate cancer survival. However, heterogeneity in survival outcomes existed based on the definition of high risk used. Clinical stage T3 and high Gleason score were most strongly associated with PCSM and OM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document