Long Head of the Triceps Transfer for Elbow Flexion

2007 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 45e-47e ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenthilkumar Naidu ◽  
Aymeric Lim ◽  
Looi Kok Poh ◽  
V P. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Long Head

scholarly journals Measurements of Tendon Movement Within the Bicipital Groove After Suprapectoral Intra-articular Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097753
Author(s):  
Brian J. Kelly ◽  
Alan W. Reynolds ◽  
Patrick J. Schimoler ◽  
Alexander Kharlamov ◽  
Mark Carl Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Full Range ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Bicipital Groove ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Scapular Motion

Background: Lesions of the long head of the biceps can be successfully treated with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when surgical management is elected. The advantage of a tenodesis is that it prevents the potential development of a cosmetic deformity or cramping muscle pain. Proponents of a subpectoral tenodesis believe that “groove pain” may remain a problem after suprapectoral tenodesis as a result of persistent motion of the tendon within the bicipital groove. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate the motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove before and after a suprapectoral intra-articular tenodesis. The hypothesis was that there would be minimal to no motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove after tenodesis. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the long head of the biceps tendon as well as the bicipital groove. Inclinometers and fiducials (optical markers) were used to measure the motions of the scapula, forearm, and biceps tendon through a full range of shoulder and elbow motions. A suprapectoral biceps tenodesis was then performed, and the motions were repeated. The motion of the biceps tendon was quantified as a function of scapular or forearm motion in each plane, both before and after the tenodesis. Results: There was minimal motion of the native biceps tendon during elbow flexion and extension but significant motion during all planes of scapular motion before tenodesis, with the most motion occurring during shoulder flexion-extension (20.73 ± 8.21 mm). The motion of the biceps tendon after tenodesis was significantly reduced during every plane of scapular motion compared with the native state ( P < .01 in all planes of motion), with a maximum motion of only 1.57 mm. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant reduction in motion of the biceps tendon in all planes of scapular motion after the intra-articular biceps tenodesis. The motion of the biceps tendon within the bicipital groove was essentially eliminated after the suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Clinical Relevance: This arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis technique can significantly reduce motion of the biceps tendon within the groove in this cadaveric study, possibly reducing the likelihood of groove pain in the clinical setting.

Transfer of a Motor Fascicle From the Ulnar Nerve to the Branch of the Radial Nerve Destined to the Long Head of the Triceps for Restoration of Elbow Extension in Brachial Plexus Surgery

Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. E516-E520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandro Pretto Flores
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Radial Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Elbow Extension ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Brachial Plexus Surgery

Abstract BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Restoration of elbow extension has not been considered of much importance regarding functional outcomes in brachial plexus surgery; however, the flexion of the elbow joint is only fully effective if the motion can be stabilized, what can be achieved solely if the triceps brachii is coactivated. To present a novel nerve transfer of a healthy motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve to the nerve of the long head of the triceps to restore the elbow extension function in brachial plexus injuries involving the upper and middle trunks. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: Case 1 is a 32-year-old man sustaining a right brachial extended upper plexus injury in a motorcycle accident 5 months before admission. The computed tomography myelogram demonstrated avulsion of the C5 and C6 roots. Case 2 is a 24-year-old man who sustained a C5-C7 injury to the left brachial plexus in a traffic accident 4 months before admission. Computed tomography myelogram demonstrated signs of C6 and C7 root avulsion. The technique included an incision at the medial border of the biceps, in the proximal third of the involved arm, followed by identification of the ulnar nerve, the radial nerve, and the branch to the long head of the triceps. The proximal stump of a motor fascicle from the ulnar nerve was sutured directly to the distal stump of the nerve of the long head of the triceps. Techniques to restore elbow flexion and shoulder abduction were applied in both cases. Triceps strength Medical Research Council M4 grade was obtained in both cases. CONCLUSION: The attempted nerve transfer was effective for restoration of elbow extension in primary brachial plexus surgery; however, it should be selected only for cases in which other reliable donor nerves were used to restore elbow flexion.

scholarly journals Differential muscle function between muscle synergists: long and lateral heads of the triceps in jumping and landing goats (Capra hircus)

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1262-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Carroll ◽  
David V. Lee ◽  
Andrew A. Biewener
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Function ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Capra Hircus ◽  
Triceps Brachii ◽  
Joint Work ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Lateral Head

We investigate how the biarticular long head and monoarticular lateral head of the triceps brachii function in goats ( Capra hircus) during jumping and landing. Elbow moment and work were measured from high-speed video and ground reaction force (GRF) recordings. Muscle activation and strain were measured via electromyography and sonomicrometry, and muscle stress was estimated from elbow moment and by partitioning stress based on its relative strain rate. Elbow joint and muscle function were compared among three types of limb usage: jump take-off (lead limb), the step prior to jump take-off (lag limb), and landing. We predicted that the strain and work patterns in the monoarticular lateral head would follow the kinematics and work of the elbow more closely than would those of the biarticular long head. In general this prediction was supported. For instance, the lateral head stretched (5 ± 2%; mean ± SE) in the lead and lag limbs to absorb work during elbow flexion and joint work absorption, while the long head shortened (−7 ± 1%) to produce work. During elbow extension, both muscles shortened by similar amounts (−10 ± 2% long; −13 ± 4% lateral) in the lead limb to produce work. Both triceps heads functioned similarly in landing, stretching (13 ± 3% in the long head and 19 ± 5% in the lateral) to absorb energy. In general, the long head functioned to produce power at the shoulder and elbow, while the lateral head functioned to resist elbow flexion and absorb work, demonstrating that functional diversification can arise between mono- and biarticular muscle agonists operating at the same joint.

Long Head of the Triceps Muscle Transfer for Active Elbow Flexion in Arthrogryposis

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria R. Gogola ◽  
Marybeth Ezaki ◽  
Scott N. Oishi ◽  
Idris Gharbaoui ◽  
James B. Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Muscle Transfer ◽  
Triceps Muscle ◽  
Long Head

Impact of experimental long head of biceps tendon pain on shoulder abduction and elbow flexion strength

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1535-1536
Author(s):  
Masashi Izumi ◽  
Yutaka Morisawa ◽  
Yoshitaka Muramatsu ◽  
Yukihiro Kajita ◽  
Yusuke Iwahori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biceps Tendon ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Shoulder Abduction ◽  
Long Head Of Biceps ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Flexion Strength

A Comparison of Forearm Supination and Elbow Flexion Strength in Patients With Long Head of the Biceps Tenotomy or Tenodesis

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Shank ◽  
Steven B. Singleton ◽  
Sepp Braun ◽  
Michael J. Kissenberth ◽  
Arun Ramappa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Biceps Tenotomy ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Flexion Strength

Simultaneous Phrenic and Intercostal Nerves Transfer for Elbow Flexion and Extension in Total Brachial Plexus Root Avulsion Injury

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 496-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanchai Malungpaishope ◽  
Somsak Leechavengvongs ◽  
Patamaporn Ratchawatana ◽  
Akaradech Pitakveerakul ◽  
Sarun Jindahara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phrenic Nerve ◽  
Nerve Transfer ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Root Avulsion ◽  
Trunk Flexion ◽  
Simultaneous Transfer ◽  
Long Head ◽  
Intercostal Nerves ◽  
Brachial Root Avulsion ◽  
Flexion And Extension

Background: To report the results of restoring the elbow flexion and extension in patients with total brachial root avulsion injuries by simultaneous transfer of the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps and three intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps. Methods: Ten patients with total brachial root avulsion injuries underwent the spinal accessory nerve transfer to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder reconstruction. Simultaneous transfer of the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps via the sural nerve graft and three intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps was done for restoration of the elbow flexion and extension. Trunk flexion exercise program was used for all patients postoperatively. The mean follow up period was 36 months. Results: For elbow flexion, there were two M4, seven M3, and one M1. For elbow extension, there were three M4, four M3, two M2, and one M1. No patient demonstrated a respiratory problem clinically postoperatively. The average FVC% decreased to 61% of the predicted value at 24 months after surgery. Conclusions: The simultaneous nerve transfer using the phrenic nerve to the nerve to the biceps and 3 intercostal nerves to the nerve of the long head of the triceps with postoperative trunk flexion exercise provide a comparable result for restoration of elbow function in total brachial plexus root avulsion injury. The patients who appear to have a respiratory problem and are unable to comply with the post-operative respiratory muscles training should be contraindicated for this simultaneous transfer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document