Translumbar Repair of a Type II Endoleak Associated with an Aorta–to–Left Renal Vein Fistula after Aortic Stent-Graft Placement

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Resnick ◽  
Victor Rome ◽  
Mark Eskandari
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuh K. Chong ◽  
Thien V. How ◽  
Geoffrey L. Gilling-Smith ◽  
Peter L. Harris

Purpose: To investigate the effect on intrasac pressure of stent-graft deployment within a life-size silicone rubber model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maintained under physiological conditions of pressure and flow. Methods: A commercial bifurcated device with the polyester fabric preclotted with gelatin was deployed in the AAA model. A pump system generated physiological flow. Mean and pulse aortic and intrasac pressures were measured simultaneously using pressure transducers. To simulate a type I endoleak, plastic tubing was placed between the aortic wall and the stent-graft at the proximal anchoring site. Type II endoleak was simulated by means of side branches with set inflow and outflow pressures and perfusion rates. Type IV endoleak was replicated by removal of gelatin from the graft fabric. Results: With no endoleak, the coated graft reduced the mean and pulse sac pressures to negligible values. When a type I endoleak was present, mean sac pressure reached a value similar to mean aortic pressure. When net flow through the sac due to a type II endoleak was present, mean sac pressure was a function of the inlet pressure, while pulse pressure in the sac was dependent on both inlet and outlet pressures. As perfusion rates increased, both mean and pulse sac pressures decreased. When there was no outflow, mean sac pressure was similar to mean aortic pressure. In the presence of both type I and type II endoleaks, mean sac pressure reached mean aortic pressure when the net perfusion rate was low. Conclusions: In vitro studies are useful in gaining an understanding of the impact of different types of endoleaks, in isolation and in combination, on intrasac pressure after aortic stent-graft deployment.


Surgery Today ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1108-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuji Takiguchi ◽  
Yasuhiro Miyazaki ◽  
Kohei Murakami ◽  
Tomoki Makino ◽  
Tsuyoshi Takahashi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99
Author(s):  
Yosuke Motoharu ◽  
Haruo Aramoto ◽  
Togo Norimatsu ◽  
Minoru Tabata ◽  
Toshihiro Fukui ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. E007-E009
Author(s):  
Aakash Shah ◽  
Bella Onwumbiko ◽  
Carlos O. Encarnacion ◽  
Eric Krause ◽  
Erik Sorensen ◽  
...  

In patients with intraluminal thrombus, commonly applied temporary circulatory support modalities are contraindicated secondary to concern regarding distal or proximal (specifically veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) embolization of the thrombus. Therefore, in patients with cardiogenic shock and synchronous intraluminal descending aortic thrombus, support options are quite limited. We report a case of a 66-year-old man in cardiogenic shock, due to an ischemic cardiomyopathy, who also had intramural thrombus with an intraluminal component in the descending thoracic aorta. An endovascular stent graft was inserted inside the aorta over the location of the mural thrombus. This allowed for the placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) for pre-operative optimization. After 3 days, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted via left anterolateral thoracotomy with hemi-sternotomy, and the IABP was removed. Post-operatively, he had a relatively uncomplicated course without signs of embolic phenomena and ultimately was discharged home. Surveillance computed tomography imaging at 6 months showed no endovascular leak or migration of the stent. This case demonstrates the feasibility of aortic stent graft placement to allow safe insertion of an IABP in the setting of aortic mural thrombus.  Furthermore, it demonstrates the safety and feasibility of LVAD implantation after recent aortic stent graft placement.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140
Author(s):  
G. von Knobelsdorff ◽  
R. M. Höppner ◽  
P. H. Tonner ◽  
A. Paris ◽  
C. A. Nienaber ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 496.e1-496.e7
Author(s):  
Ken Min Chin ◽  
Shaun Q.W. Lee ◽  
Han Jie Lee ◽  
Chng Siew Ping ◽  
Jack Kian Chng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document