Effect of Omeprazole on Oral Iron Replacement in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia

2004 ◽  
Vol 97 (9) ◽  
pp. 887-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek R. Sharma ◽  
Mark A. Brannon ◽  
Elizabeth A. Carloss
Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 5101-5101
Author(s):  
Mark Lee ◽  
Eun Young Song ◽  
Yeo Min Yun ◽  
So Young Yoon ◽  
Yo Han Cho ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5101 Background Helicobacter pylori infection seems to subvert the human iron regulatory mechanism, and thus up-regulate hepcidin that results in unexplained iron deficiency anemia (IDA). We evaluated serum pro-hepcidin levels before and after H. pylori eradication in IDA patients to assess whether it plays a role in H. pylori-related IDA. Materials and Methods Subjects diagnosed as unexplained IDA underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy to diagnose H. pylori infection and to exclude gastrointestinal bleeding. Blood sampling were done before H. pylori eradication and after a month. Serum pro-hepcidin level was measured by a commercialized enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay kit. Results Initial serum pro-hepcidin levels were not different between 23 H. pylori-infected subjects (212.9 ± 88.2 ng/ml) and nine non-infected subjects (217.8 ± 56.2 ng/ml) (p=0.879). Serum pro-hepcidin level decreased after either dual oral iron replacement with H. pylori eradication (p=0.011) or H. pylori eradication without iron replacement (p=0.075). It also decreased after iron replacement in non-infected subjects (p=0.086). The reduction ratio of serum pro-hepcidin level after the treatment was not different between three groups (p=0.972). Conclusions Serum pro-hepcidin level decreases after either H. pylori eradication or oral iron administration with IDA improvement. Serum pro-hepcidin is related to the status of anemia rather than the presence of H. pylori itself. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4737-4737
Author(s):  
Nilupa Gaspe Mudiyanselage ◽  
Tarek Elrafei ◽  
Beth Lewis ◽  
Mary King ◽  
Marianna Strakhan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Prior studies have indicated that transfusion is unusual (2%) in pregnant women with iron deficiency anemia. Nonetheless, compliance with oral iron replacement can be an issue and physicians may wish to use IV iron therapy in markedly anemic pregnant women. Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of adding intravenous iron sucrose concentrate (ISC) to pregnant patients already taking oral iron in terms of effect on hemoglobin, effect on ferritin levels, rates of transfusion, and cost. Methods: We analyzed all referrals from Obstetrics to Hematology clinic and Obstetrics consultation (Internal medicine) clinic from January 2014 to June 2016. Of the 176 pregnant patients, 98 were referred for anemia, including 81 patients with Hgb < 12 g/dl and ferritin < 20 ug/L. All had previously been given oral ferrous sulfate prescriptions. Patients with hemoglobinopathy were excluded. All 81 patients were advised to continue on the oral iron, and 40 were given IV iron sucrose (ISC group). Results: The average cumulative dose of iron sucrose was 700 mg, a mean of 5.575 doses (initiated in the third trimester in 38 of 40 patients). The lowest antepartum Hgb was 8.18 g/dl in the ISC group and 9.58 in the oral only group; there was an average Hgb increase of 2.17 vs 1.76 g/dl respectively (p=.107 NS and the 0.41 g/dl difference was considered to be of no clinical consequence). 89% in the ISC group vs 30% in the oral achieved a ferritin >20 (p=0.000015). No adverse events in the IV iron group were reported. There was 1 transfusion in the oral iron group attributable to iron deficiency (2.4%) vs none in the IV iron group (p = 0.107 NS). Two patients were transfused in the antenatal period before IV iron was started and 1 transfused because of post-partum hemorrhage. The total cost of the IV iron therapy would add an average of $1,500 per patient. Thus, and additional cost of $60,000 in IV iron would be required to prevent 1 transfusion [40:1]. Conclusions: ISC corrects ferritin in more patients than oral iron replacement, but did not significantly increase Hgb levels or have a meaningful impact on the transfusion rate. The additional cost and lack of clinically improved outcomes with IV iron argue against its use and in favor of strategies to ensure compliance with oral iron. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 721-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad N. Kloub ◽  
Mohamed A. Yassin

Iron deficiency anemia is common and worldwide distributed, particularly among females; however, it can also occur among males. Iron deficiency anemia is commonly associated with thrombocytosis; little is known about the effect of iron therapy (oral or intravenous) on other hematological parameters. We report a 29-year-old male patient with iron deficiency anemia, who received oral iron replacement therapy and developed neutropenia which recovered spontaneously 1 month later.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2679-2679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis Brenner ◽  
Paul Miller ◽  
Sally Rodriguez ◽  
Nainesh Parikh ◽  
Daniel W. Coyne

Abstract Iron deficiency anemia is common in the elderly. It is an important medical issue particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) because of the associated complications, including increased mortality, loss of functional independence, and cognitive and cardiovascular abnormalities. Oral iron replacement is frequently ineffective, being poorly tolerated due to GI side effects. Ferumoxytol, a novel semi-synthetic carbohydrate-coated iron oxide nanoparticle, is being developed as an IV iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anemia in adults and elderly CKD patients. Ferumoxytol is isotonic with plasma, has lower free iron than other available IV products, and can be given as a 510 mg dose via rapid IV bolus. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of iron replacement with ferumoxytol relative to oral iron in adults and elderly subjects with CKD, data were pooled from three open-label, multicenter, randomized Phase III trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00255437, NCT00255424, and NCT00233597). In a modified ITT Population (subjects randomized and dosed), a total of 884 subjects with CKD stages 1–5 and 5D received either 2 doses of 510 mg of IV ferumoxytol within 5±3 days or 200 mg of elemental oral iron daily for 21 days (Ferro-Sequels®). The mean change from baseline to Day 35 for hemoglobin (Hgb, the primary endpoint in these Phase III studies) was analyzed using an ANOVA with fixed effects for treatment and age categories (&lt;50, 50 to &lt;65, 65 to &lt;75, and ≥75 years) and their interaction. There was a highly significantly greater Hgb response with IV ferumoxytol relative to oral iron across all age groups (mean ± SD were 1.03±1.22 g/dL for ferumoxytol vs. 0.42±1.05 g/dL for oral iron, p&lt;0.0001). The Hgb response to IV ferumoxytol was consistently observed regardless of age and was greater than the response seen with oral iron (see Table for mean ± SD values). By contrast, there appeared to be a diminished response to oral iron with increasing age. Subject incidences of adverse events with ferumoxytol were similar to or lower than those observed with oral iron in all 3 studies. Multiple factors, including patient compliance, concomitant medications, and impaired GI absorption and/or side effects, may contribute to the ineffectiveness of oral iron. Therefore, physicians should consider the use of IV iron to more effectively treat iron deficiency anemia in all adult CKD patients, including the elderly. Change in Hemoglobin at Day 35 Ferumoxytol 2×510 mg Oral Iron Age N Baseline Hgb Change in Hgb at Day 35 N Baseline Hgb Change in Hgb at Day 35 Relative Change in Hgb (Ferumoxytol vs Oral Iron) All 605 10.15 ± 0.81 1.03 ± 1.22 279 10.33 ± 0.78 0.42 ± 1.05 245% &lt;50 105 10.22 ± 0.96 1.06 ± 1.38 38 10.16 ± 0.96 0.58 ± 1.42 183% 50 to &lt;65 192 10.14 ± 0.80 1.00 ± 1.13 112 10.40 ± 0.79 0.43 ± 1.07 233% 65 to &lt;75 163 10.14 ± 0.76 0.92± 1.19 70 10.33 ± 0.75 0.46 ± 0.89 200% ≥75 145 10.10 ± 0.74 1.17 ± 1.27 59 10.28 ± 0.69 0.25 ± 0.89 468%


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1039-1039
Author(s):  
Alina M Huang ◽  
Christine M Ho ◽  
John L. Reagan ◽  
Eric Winer

Abstract Abstract 1039 Background: Oral iron absorption occurs in the duodenum and requires increased gastric acidity to allow iron to remain in the more soluble, ferrous form. Many patients with iron deficiency anemia who require oral iron repletion are on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for management of various conditions that require acid suppression for treatment. In vitro studies suggest that inhibition of gastric acid secretion decreases the bioavailability of iron. In patients with established iron deficiency anemia who are on PPIs, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of iron replacement with concomitant PPI use. Sharma et al. published a case report on 2 patients who were iron deficient and on PPI therapy (Sharma et. al. Southern Medical Journal 2004). Their findings showed that discontinuation of the PPI resulted in improvement of iron deficiency anemia on the same dose of oral iron replacement. Additionally, Hutchinson et al. demonstrated that in individuals with hereditary hemachromatosis, those on PPIs had a significant reduction in phlebotomy requirements needed to keep serum ferritin ∼50μg (Hutchinson et. al. Gut 2007). We conducted a retrospective study to assess whether a difference exists in terms of iron repletion between patients on a PPI versus those not on a PPI. Methods: Patients were selected from the medical primary care clinic from charts dating January 2000 until January 2009. Included patients were adults older than 18 years of age, a diagnosis of iron deficiency based on ferritin < 30 with at least one follow up ferritin value, and recipients of oral iron replacement. Excluded patients were those with chronic active bleeding and anemia of chronic disease. Indices examined include iron (Fe), total iron binding capacity (TIBC), ferritin, transferrin saturation, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV). The primary endpoint of interest is repletion of iron stores defined by ferritin > 30. Those who were able to replete their iron stores are termed “responders” and those who were not are termed “nonresponders”. Results: Forty-five patients have been identified who have met the above criteria. Of these patients, 14 were on a PPI and 31 were not on a PPI. Of the patients not on a PPI, 38.7% responded to oral iron. Of the patients on a PPI, 50.0% responded to oral iron. The average initial and final values of indices of interest were compared between the groups (Table 1). Discussion: Our data suggests that patients both on and off PPIs show the ability to replete their iron stores. Furthermore, it appears that a slightly greater percentage of patients on a PPI compared with those not on a PPI are able to replete their iron stores, though the numbers remain small. Most importantly, these findings challenge the commonly held belief that PPI use impairs oral iron absorption. A prospective study is warranted to further confirm these observational data. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1993 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-661
Author(s):  
Helena U Suzuki ◽  
Mauro B Morais ◽  
Jose N Corral ◽  
Ulisses Fagundes-Neto ◽  
Nelson L Machado

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1041-1044
Author(s):  
LOUIS K DIAMOND ◽  
J. LAWRENCE NAIMAN ◽  
DONALD M. ALLEN ◽  
FRANK A. OSKI,

Experience with a new oral iron-carbohydrate complex (Jefron) in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia shows that the therapeutic results are inferior to those obtainable with ferrous sulfate. Many children showed no response after months of treatment with this drug and when subsequently placed on ferrous sulfate therapy showed a rapid rise in hemoglobin to normal levels. Preliminary studies suggest that poor gastrointestinal absorption may be a factor in the inadequate therapeutic effects.


Author(s):  
Adam K. Lewkowitz ◽  
Molly J. Stout ◽  
Emily Cooke ◽  
Seon C. Deoni ◽  
Viren D'Sa ◽  
...  

Objective Iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) can have serious consequences for mothers and babies. Iron supplementation is recommended, but the administration route is controversial. We sought to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) iron compared with oral iron on perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with IDA. Study Design This open-label RCT randomized patients with IDA (hemoglobin [hgb] <10 g/dL and ferritin <30 ng/mL) at 24 to 34 weeks' to oral iron or single 1,000-mg dose of IV low-molecular weight iron dextran over one hour. The primary outcome was maternal anemia at delivery (hgb < 11 g/dL). Secondary outcomes were mild/moderate or severe adverse reactions, maternal hgb and ferritin at delivery, blood transfusion, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, neonatal hgb and ferritin, and composite neonatal morbidity. Analysis was as per protocol. Results The trial was stopped early for logistical reasons, and the data analyzed as preliminary data to inform a larger, potentially externally funded, definitive trial. Of 55 patients approached, 38 consented. Of these, 15 were withdrawn: 5 received IV iron from their primary obstetrician after being randomized to oral iron and 10 declined to receive IV iron. Of the remaining 23 patients, who were included in the analytic population, 13 received oral iron and 10 received IV iron. The rate of maternal anemia at delivery (hgb < 11 g/dL) was high overall but significantly reduced with IV iron (40 vs. 85%, p = 0.039). Rates of maternal hgb < 10 g/dL were significantly lower in the IV iron group (10 vs. 54%, p = 0.029). There were no severe adverse reactions and similar rates of mild/moderate reactions between groups. Conclusion IV iron reduces rates of anemia at the time of admission for delivery, supporting a larger RCT comparing IV versus oral iron for the treatment of IDA of pregnancy powered for definitive clinical outcomes. However, issues uncovered in this RCT suggest that patient, clinician, and systems-level barriers associated with different IDA treatment modalities must be considered prior to conducting a larger RCT. This study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov with identifier no.: NCT03438227. Key Points


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document