COGNITION, INTENTION AND BEHAVIOR SURVEY ON LIVING ORGAN DONATION IN CHINESE LIVING KIDNEY DONORS AND GENERAL POPULATION

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 597
Author(s):  
C Wang ◽  
C Xiao ◽  
S Chen ◽  
L Chen ◽  
J Fei ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 508-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Timmerman ◽  
M. Laging ◽  
G. J. Westerhof ◽  
R. Timman ◽  
W. C. Zuidema ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Cuesta-Briand ◽  
Natalie Wray ◽  
Neil Boudville

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e041122
Author(s):  
Mavish Chaudry ◽  
Gunnar Hilmar Gislason ◽  
Emil Loldrup Fosbøl ◽  
Lars Køber ◽  
Thomas Alexander Gerds ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWe aimed to investigate the long-term absolute risk of hypertension and cardiovascular disease after kidney donation in living kidney donors.DesignLiving kidney donors were matched to 10 controls from the general population.SettingMultiple Danish national registries were used to identify living kidney donors from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2017 nationwide.Participants1262 living kidney donors and 12 620 controls.Main outcome measuresHypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes.ResultsThe median age of living kidney donors was 52 (men 43%). Hypertension developed in 50 (4%) and 231 (1.8%) with a median follow-up of 7 years (IQR 3.3–12.1 years with a maximum follow-up of 22 years) and 6.9 years (IQR 3.2–11.7 years and maximum follow-up of 22 years) for donors and controls, respectively. The absolute risk of hypertension was 2.3% (95% CI 1.4% to 3.2%) and 1.2% (95% CI 1.0% to 1.4%), 4.2% (95% CI 2.8% to 5.7%) and 2.4% (95% CI 2.1% to 2.8%), 8.6% (95% CI 6.0% to 11.3%) and 3.3% (95% CI 2.8% to 3.8%) within 5, 10, 15 years for donors and controls, respectively. The ratio of the 10-year absolute risks for hypertension was 1.64 (95% CI 1.44 to 1.88) for donors compared with the controls. Two donors and four controls developed renal replacement therapy requiring end-stage renal disease during follow-up. The absolute risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes was 7.3% (95% CI 5.7% to 9.5%) and 8.3% (95% CI 7.7% to 9.0%), 1.7% (95% CI 0.7% to 2.8%) and 3.2% (95% CI 2.7% to 3.6%) at 10 years for donors and controls, respectively.ConclusionsLiving kidney donors have an increased long-term absolute risk of hypertension compared with controls from the general population.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunjeong Kang ◽  
Jangwook Lee ◽  
Sehoon Park ◽  
Yaerim Kim ◽  
Hyo Jeong Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to know how the general population recognizes live kidney donation in Korea. Participants were randomly selected from the general population after proportional allocation by region, sex, and age. Selected participants received a questionnaire that included demographic information, socioeconomic and marital statuses, prior recognition of live donor KT, expected changes after donation, and the need for support after donor nephrectomy. Among the 1,000 participants from the web-based survey, 83.8% answered they fully understood living donor KT, 81.1% knew about them, and 51.1% were willing to donate. Various complications after nephrectomy and deterioration in health after donation were the most significant reasons for those reluctant to donate. Most agreed that the government should provide social and economic support to living kidney donors, especially after exposure to the description of donor nephrectomy. Financial support, including surgery and regular medical check-up costs, was the most preferred government support. The Korean general population seemed aware of the value and safety of kidney donation, although only half of them were willing to donate due to concerns about possible complications. Most participants agreed on social and economic support for living kidney donors, especially surgery-related costs.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 594-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond R. Townsend ◽  
Peter P. Reese ◽  
Mary Ann Lim

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunjeong Kang ◽  
Jangwook Lee ◽  
Sehoon Park ◽  
Yaerim Kim ◽  
Hyo Jeong Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: It is necessary to know how the general population recognizes live kidney donation in Korea, where living donor kidney transplantations (KT) are the mainstream.Methods: Participants were randomly selected from the general population after proportional allocation by region, sex, and age. Selected participants received a questionnaire that included demographic information, socioeconomic and marital statuses, prior recognition of live donor KT, expected changes after donation, and the need for support after donor nephrectomy.Results: In total, 1,000 participants responded to the web-based survey. After reading the detailed explanation, 83.8% of the respondents answered that they fully understood living donor KT. Among the participants, 811(81.1%) answered that they knew about living donor KT, and 51.1% were willing to donate. Various complications after nephrectomy (54.4%) and deterioration in health after donation (69.1%) were the most important reasons for those who were reluctant to donate, and the possibility of a decrease in economic activities after donation accounted for 33.8%. Overall, 73.2% were more likely to agree that the government should provide social and economic support to living kidney donors; this number increased to 81.3% after exposure to the description of donor nephrectomy (P<0.001). Financial support, including surgery (74.2%) and regular medical check-up costs (70.1%), was the most preferred government support.Conclusions: The Korean general population seemed to be aware of the value and safety of kidney donation, although only half of them were willing to donate due to concerns about possible complications. Most participants agreed on social and economic support for living kidney donors, especially for surgery-related costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document