EARLY STEROID WITHDRAWAL FOLLOWING RENAL TRANSPLANTATION INCREASES THE RISK OF ACUTE REJECTION: A META-ANALYSIS

2008 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
S Knight ◽  
L Barcena ◽  
P Morris
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Xin ◽  
Yang Hui ◽  
Zhang Xiaodong ◽  
Cui Xiangli ◽  
Wang Shihui ◽  
...  

Objectives: Valganciclovir 900 mg/day is approved for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, but 450 mg/day is seems also effective. We systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation recipients. Methods: An electronic search was conducted up to November 29, 2016. The primary outcomes were incidences of CMV, CMV disease, mortality and opportunistic infection. The second outcomes were acute rejection, allograft loss, adverse drug reaction (ADR). Results: 7 cohort studies, all with high quality involving (1431 patients) were included. There was no significant difference of the incidence of following CMV disease (1271 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.43, p=0.36), acute rejection (1343 patients, OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.53-1.14, p=0.19), allograft loss (1271 patients, OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.31-1.35, p=0.24), mortality (1271 patients, OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.20-1.47, p=0.23) and opportunistic infections (OI) (985 patients, OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.52-1.10, p=0.14) between the low-dose and the high-dose valganciclovir  prophylaxis. And no significant difference was observed for premature valganciclovir discontinuation (1010 patients, OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.52-1.25, p=0.33) and the incidence of leukopenia (1082 patients, OR 0.65, 95%CI 0.34-1.22, p=0.18) between the two regimens. Conclusion: 450 mg and 900 mg doses of valganciclovir are equipotent for CMV universal prophylaxis. CMV 450 mg prophylaxis should be used for renal transplant recipients. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.


Renal Failure ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Wei Gao ◽  
Zhi-Hua Zhou ◽  
Sheng-Cong Guo ◽  
Yi-Feng Guo ◽  
Fang Guo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keliang Chen ◽  
Zuohua Yu ◽  
Guangyi Huang ◽  
Dongye Liu ◽  
Zhongpan Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract To objectively evaluate the effectivity and safety of Bailing Capsule After Renal Transplantation. Search Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Full-text Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, SCI, EMBase, The Cochrane Library database. Chinese uses "Bai Ling Capsule" "Kidney Transplant" as the search term, and English uses "Bailing Capsule","Bailing Jiaonang", "Corbrin Capsule", "CS-C-Q80", "Kidney transplant", "Renal transplant", etc. as search terms. Two people screened, extracted data, quality assessment and data analysis of the retrieved articles according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria.A total of 10 studies were included, including 1580 patients. Meta analysis results:the experimental group was more effective than the control group in SCr level( WMD = -28.40,95% CI: -45.87 ~ -10.94, Z = 3.19, P =0.001)、BUN levels( WMD = -0.72,95% CI: -1.18 ~ -0.25, Z = 3.02, P =0.003)、 ALT levels( WMD = -6.05,95% CI:- 9.26 ~ -2.85, Z = 3.70, P = 0.0002)、AST levels( WMD = -11.96,95% CI: -19.2 5~ -4.68, Z = 3.22, P = 0.001).But the experimental group did not show significant effects in reducing the incidence of acute rejection.( OR = 0.45,95% CI: 0.19 ~ 1.11, Z = 1.74, P =0.08)Compared with the control group, Bailing Capsule treatment group has obvious advantages in Improvement of liver and kidney function after renal transplantation1,but did not show good clinical results in reducing the incidence of acute rejection.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 440-440
Author(s):  
Kei Ishibashi ◽  
Tomohiko Yanagida ◽  
Tadahiko Tokumoto ◽  
Kazunari Tanabe ◽  
Hiraki Shirakawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document