Use of Low-dose Ketamine Infusion for Pediatric Patients With Sickle Cell Disease-related Pain

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Zempsky ◽  
Kristin A. Loiselle ◽  
John M. Corsi ◽  
J. Nathan Hagstrom
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2249-2249
Author(s):  
Michel Gowhari ◽  
Aileen Chu ◽  
Julie Golembiewski ◽  
Robert E. Molokie

Abstract Introduction Acute painful (vaso-occlusive) episode is the clinical hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD). Individuals with SCD may experience acute episodes of severe debilitating pain that requires an acute care/emergency room visit and/or hospitalization. While parenteral opioids are the mainstay of treatment, the use of these agents may be complicated by toxicity, tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Additionally, using one medication/mode of treatment may be inadequate to achieve optimal safe pain control. Ketamine as an adjuvant treatment (administered in low sub-anesthetic doses) has been recognized for its utility in the management of a variety of painful conditions, ranging from oncologic to post-operative pain. However, there is limited literature supporting its use in treating acute sickle painful episodes. Here we have undertaken a retrospective analysis of adult patients with SCD who were treated with low-dose ketamine infusion during an acute painful episode in order to determine its effects of lowering opioid requirements. Methods A retrospective chart and database review was conducted on all patients with SCD who received low-dose ketamine infusion during an acute painful episode in the past three years at a single institution. After a review of inpatient pharmacy records, thirty unique subjects with SCD were identified to have received low-dose ketamine infusion during an acute painful episode in the past three years. For each of these subjects, total and daily (24hr) opioid requirements were determined for the admissions of a vaso-occlusive episode where ketamine infusion was used as an adjuvant for pain control and compared to the prior admission. For the ketamine admission, opioid requirements before, during, and after infusion were also compared. The opioid requirement was converted to intravenous morphine equivalents for standardized comparison. Total opioid and daily (24hr) requirements were determined for each admission. Results Full analysis of all thirty subjects (uncomplicated and complicated pain crises, ketamine infusion of any duration) revealed that the opioid requirement was significantly lower after ketamine compared to before ketamine was started (Wilcoxon signed-rank test P=0.029). The total opioid requirement during the entire ketamine admission, however, was not significantly different from the total opioid requirement during the non-ketamine admission (P=0.088). When a sub-analysis was performed on subjects receiving a ketamine infusion for greater than 24 hours (N=22), the 24hr opioid requirement was significantly lower after ketamine compared to before ketamine was started (P=0.0397). The total opioid requirement during the entire ketamine admission was not significantly different from the total opioid requirement during the non-ketamine admission (P=0.194). When a sub-analysis was performed on subjects with an uncomplicated vaso-occlusive episode (N=17), 24hr opioid requirement was significantly lower after ketamine compared to before ketamine was started (P=0.036). Additionally, the average daily opioid requirement throughout the entire ketamine admission was significantly lower than the average daily opioid requirement during the non-ketamine admission (P=0.001). The total opioid requirement during the entire ketamine admission was not significantly different from the total opioid requirement during the non-ketamine admission (P=1). For the full and subgroup analyses of opioid requirements during the ketamine admission, there was a significantly greater amount of opioid required before the ketamine was started compared to during and after ketamine infusion. Conclusion The use of low-dose infusion of ketamine as an adjuvant for pain control in patients with SCD during vaso-occlusive episode resulted in a significant decrease in opioid requirements. Hence it appears that a low-dose ketamine infusion has utility in the treatment of acute pain crises in adult patients with sickle cell disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3226-3226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Neri ◽  
Sophie Pestieau ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Angelo Elmi ◽  
Deepika S. Darbari

Abstract Abstract 3226 Background/Objectives: Opioids are the mainstay of therapy for painful vasoocclusive crises (VOCs) in sickle cell disease (SCD). For some patients, opioid-induced hyperalgesia caused by activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been considered to contribute to poor analgesia. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, could be a useful adjunct therapy; however safety concerns remain with its use. We examined records of SCD patients at our institution who received ketamine as an adjuvant to opioids at the discretion of anesthesia pain services over the past 4 years. We sought to explore the safety of ketamine and determine its effect on daily opioid requirement in SCD patients hospitalized for VOCs. Methods: The Institutional Review Board at Children's National Medical Center approved this study. A retrospective case-crossover study was conducted through review of the electronic medical record. For each patient we selected 2-paired hospitalizations occurring within 2 years of each other. One hospitalization where the patient received low-dose ketamine infusion in addition to opioid patient controlled analgesia (PCA), and a second hospitalization where the same patient received opioid PCA alone. We compared clinical characteristics of hospitalizations where patients did or did not receive ketamine. Exploratory bivariate analysis (paired t-test and McNemar's test) was used to compare variables between the pairs. Results: Thirty-three patients were identified to have at least 2 hospitalizations for VOC within 20 months of each other where they received adjuvant ketamine infusion during one, while not during the other. Average age was 15.6 ± 3.4 years, 67 % were females, and 36 % were on hydroxyurea therapy. SCD genotypes included homozygous SS 70%, SC 24 %, S-beta-zero thalassemia 3%, and S-beta-plus thalassemia 3%. Mean number of admissions in the 6 months prior to the ketamine hospitalization was 2 (range 0–5) and 64 % had ≥ 2 prior admissions within 6 months. Ketamine dose was 0.1 mg/kg/h for all patients except one who briefly received 0.15 mg/kg/hr. During the ketamine and opioid PCA hospitalization patients reported overall higher pain scores (6.53 vs. 5.94 out of 10; p = 0.0356), required higher doses of opioid (0.0395 mg/kg/hr vs. 0.0323 mg/kg/hr; p = 0.0038), and had a longer length of stay (LOS) (5.6 vs. 4.4 days; p =0.0148) as compared to the PCA alone hospitalization. Patients were more likely to have a diagnosis of acute chest syndrome (ACS) at some point during the ketamine and opioid PCA hospitalization (42% vs. 15 %; p = 0.0126) as compared to the opioid PCA alone hospitalization. Patients were more likely to be treated with additional adjuvant pain control agents (diazepam, lorazepam, gabapentin, pregabalin, amitripyline, or duloxetine) during the ketamine and opioid PCA admission as compared with opioid PCA alone admissions (45% vs. 9% p = 0.0013). Rates of red blood cell transfusion and ICU transfer were not different between the hospitalizations. In 3 patients ketamine was discontinued due to vivid dreams delusions, or dizziness. Nausea, pruritis, sedation, and use of complementary therapies were similar between hospitalizations. Conclusions: We did not observe an opioid sparing effect of ketamine infusion as hypothesized in this group of frequently hospitalized patients. Low-dose ketamine is a safe adjuvant medication for SCD patients hospitalized for VOCs. Higher opioid use during ketamine and opioid PCA admissions is likely due to patients experiencing more severe VOCs as indicated by higher pain scores involving multiple sites, higher rates of ACS, and longer LOS. These severity measures may have contributed to the decision of the pain medicine service to add low-dose ketamine infusion to standard opioid PCA in this retrospective sample. Finally, VOCs in this group of frequently admitted individuals may represent chronic pain which is known to be minimally responsive to most pharmacologic therapies. Patients receiving ketamine appear to be using additional adjuvant pain agents and may be underutilizing hydroxyurea. Prospective randomized studies of adjuvant ketamine therapy in patients with SCD are warranted to determine true efficacy. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Ketamine is a non-barbiturate phencyclidine derivative that is approved for use as a surgical anesthetic. It is not approved for use in pain management, however is commonly used in low-doses as an adjunct to traditional pain control therapies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azza A. Tantawy ◽  
Amira A. Adly ◽  
Fatma S. E. Ebeid ◽  
Eman A. Ismail ◽  
Mahitab M. Hussein ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2106-2106
Author(s):  
Madiha Iqbal ◽  
Tea Reljic ◽  
Ernesto Ayala ◽  
Hemant S. Murthy ◽  
Ambuj Kumar ◽  
...  

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy which affects over 300,000 children born each year worldwide. In spite of improvement in supportive care in recent years, there is still a lack of effective treatment options. SCD leads to debilitating and cyclic episodes of erythrocyte sickling with progressive organ injury, contributing to lifetime morbidity and shortened life expectancy. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative therapy for SCD because engraftment is associated with resolution of the clinical phenotype of the disease and abrogation of its complications. Medical literature on allo-HCT for SCD is largely limited to children. Recent studies have evaluated the efficacy of allo-HCT in the adult population. Here, we conduct a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to the efficacy (or lack thereof) of allo-HCT in children and adults. Materials and methods: We performed a comprehensive search of the medical literature using PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library on July 3rd, 2019. We extracted data on clinical outcomes related to benefits (overall [OS] and disease free/event free survival [EFS/DFS]) and harms (non-relapse mortality [NRM] and graft failure [GF]), independently by two authors. Our search strategy identified 1001 references but only 30 studies (n= 1995 patients) were included in this systematic review/meta-analysis. We also performed a sub analysis on clinical outcomes for studies that included only pediatric patients (defined as <18 years) and those in patients ≥18 years of age. Results: Median age for patients enrolled in all the studies was at 10 years. Recurrent veno-occlusive crises represented the most common indication for allo-HCT followed by acute chest syndrome and stroke; nevertheless, most patients had more than one indication. Matched related donors (MRD) were the most common donor source (93%). Bone marrow was the most common source of hematopoietic stem cells (77%). Majority of patients underwent conditioning with myeloablative regimens (77%). Pooled OS rates (n=29 studies, 1681 patients) after allogeneic HCT was 95% (95%CI=93-96%) with low heterogeneity (I2=6.4%) among included studies (Figure 1). Pooled EFS/DFS rates (n=29 studies, 1894 patients) post-allografting was 90% (95%CI=87-93%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=54%). Pooled NRM rates from 30 studies (1995 patients) was 4% (95%CI=2-6%) with low heterogeneity (I2=29.4%). Pooled GF rates from 28 studies (1851 patients) was 4% (95%CI=2-6%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=55%). A subset analysis specifically for pediatric patients (n= 11 studies, 1009 patients, median age at 9.7 years) showed a pooled OS rate of 96% (95%CI=94-97%) with low heterogeneity (I2=0%); and for adult patients (n=3 studies, 51 patients, median age at 33.4 years) the pooled OS was 94% (95%CI=80-100%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=52%). Pooled EFS/DFS for pediatric patients (n= 11 studies, 1009 patients) was at 89 %( 95%CI=84-93%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=55.1%); and for adult patients (n=2 studies, 30 patients) was at 95% (95%CI=83-100%) with high heterogeneity (I2=96.5%). Pooled NRM from 10 studies with pediatric patients (281 patients) was at 6 % (95%CI=3-10%) with low heterogeneity (I2=0%); and from 3 studies with adult patients (51 patients) was at 1% (95%CI=0-7%) with low heterogeneity (I2=15.1%). Pooled GF from 10 studies with pediatric patients (281 patients) was at 3 % (95%CI=1-7%) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=40%); and from 2 studies with adult patients (30 patients) was at 5% (95%CI=0-17%) with high heterogeneity (I2=95.4%). Conclusions: The results of our systematic review/meta-analysis show excellent OS, EFS/DFS in children and adults undergoing allo-HCT with pooled OS rates exceeding 90%. The main limitation to offering an allo-HCT in SCD remains the availability of a suitable donor as 85% of patients meeting criteria do not have a MRD. We anticipate that with emergence of haploidentical transplantation the number of allo-HCT will increase in the future. GF remains a significant concern in this population and future studies should focus on novel immune suppression strategies to help reduce GF. Disclosures Kharfan-Dabaja: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document