Complications and Soft Tissue Coverage Following Complete Articular, Open Tibial Plafond Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Olson ◽  
Krishna Anand ◽  
John G. Esposito ◽  
Arvind G. von Keudell ◽  
Edward K. Rodriguez ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
J.L. Marsh

♦ Tibial plafond fractures demand respect, largely due to the fragile soft tissue envelope that surrounds the distal tibia♦ Careful preoperative planning followed by meticulous operative handling of the soft tissues is required to avoid devastating complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Legg ◽  
Y Ibrahim ◽  
K Malik-Tabassum

Abstract Introduction Tibial plafond fractures (TPF) are uncommon but potentially devastating injuries to the ankle. Meticulous care of the associated soft tissue injury is imperative in managing these fractures. The reported benefits of circular external fixation (CEF) include the ability to affect fracture reduction and create stable fixation, while limiting further soft tissue insult. This article provides the systematic review of the clinical and functional outcomes of TPF treated definitively with CEF. Method A literature search from inception to 13th November 2020 was performed. Quality and risk of bias was assessed using standardised scoring tools. Results 16 studies were included. 303 patients were analysed. Mean follow-up was 35 months. The mean time in CEF was 18 weeks and mean time to union was 21 weeks. Non-union and malunion occurred in 3.2% and 12.4% respectively. The overall complication rate was 12.3%. The rate of deep infection was 4.8%. No amputations were reported. Minor soft tissue infection (including pin site infections) accounted for 56.7% of complications. Almost two-thirds achieved good-to-anatomic reduction radiologically. Mean range of motion assessments were 11.8 and 24.8 degrees in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, respectively. Approximately one-third reported excellent functional outcome scores. Quality of the studies was deemed satisfactory. A moderate risk of bias was acknowledged. Conclusions This systematic review provides an evidence-based summary, which highlights CEF as an acceptable treatment option with comparable complication rate and outcome scores to that of internal fixation. However, we acknowledge that high quality evidence is still lacking.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supl 1) ◽  
pp. 7S
Author(s):  
Rafael Da Rocha Macedo ◽  
João Paulo Gonçalves dos Santos ◽  
Dario Putini ◽  
Luciano Miller Reis Rodrigues

Introduction: Patients with lower extremity fractures have a high incidence of peri- and postoperative complications, such as extensive swelling, blisters, surgical wound infection, slow wound healing, persistent wound drainage and suture dehiscence. In calcaneal and tibial plafond fractures and ankle fractures/dislocations, especially in patients older than 50 years and those with diabetes, these complications are associated with a longer hospital stay and increased treatment costs and morbidity and mortality rates. The objective of this study is to perform a literature review of the management of blisters in lower extremity fractures and, based on the findings, to develop a management protocol for these lesions.  Methods: Literature review of the state of the art in international databases. Articles published in indexed journals from 1995 to 2014 addressing soft-tissue management in ankle, calcaneal and tibial plafond fractures were selected. Results: Various treatment methods have been described in the literature: observation without intervention, application of sterile dressing, content aspiration, removal of the blister roof and application of an antibiotic ointment or topical treatment alone; all have similar outcomes regarding the delay in definitive surgery and the incidence of mild and severe soft-tissue complications. No large studies comparing these treatment alternatives are available. Conclusion: There is no consensus in the literature on the proper management of blisters. Further studies should be performed to define a protocol for the management of these lesions.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107110072097997
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Thabet ◽  
Christopher Gerzina ◽  
Francesco Sala ◽  
Soyoung Jeon ◽  
Giovanni Lovisetti ◽  
...  

Background: Open tibial plafond fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association and AO Foundation [OTA/AO] 43) are associated with severe complications, including deep infection (closed fractures, 20%; open fractures, 30%), amputation (3%-14%), and nonunion (up to 25%). Circular external fixators (CEFs) can minimize soft tissue injury. This study aimed to report the rate of union and occurrence of severe complications in patients with open tibial plafond fractures treated with CEFs. Methods: A retrospective review of case series was conducted at 3 level I trauma centers. The study included patients older than 18 years with open tibial plafond fractures treated with CEFs. The reported outcomes included union rate, deep infection, operative complications, and limb alignment. The radiographic measurements of anatomic alignment were obtained. Fifty-two patients were included in the study. Results: The primary union rate was 79%. No deep infection occurred in the majority (92%) of patients. No patient required amputation of the affected limb or free flap coverage. Conclusion: Definitive fixation of open tibial plafond fractures with CEFs avoided severe soft tissue complications but resulted in variation in final radiographic alignment. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
GiJun Lee ◽  
BumSik Kim ◽  
Neunghan Jeon ◽  
JungSoo Yoon ◽  
Ki Yong Hong ◽  
...  

Background: Reverse-flow posterior interosseous artery (rPIA) flap is an excellent tool for restoration of defects in the hand and upper extremity, sparing the main arteries to the hand. Its reliability has been well established. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one cases of rPIA flap involving 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were age, sex, etiology, size and location of the defect, flap size, number of perforators included, pedicle length, flap inset, donor site coverage, complications, and ancillary procedures. Results: This study included 44 men and 5 women, ranging in age between 10 and 73 years. The subjects had soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremity mainly due to traumatic injuries, including scar contractures of the first web space in 18 cases, thumb amputations in 6 cases, and congenital defects in 1 case. Among the 51 rPIA flap elevations, 3 cases involved flap failure due to the absence of proper pedicle. A fasciocutaneous pattern was observed in 45 cases and a myocutaneous pattern in 3 cases. In 5 cases of unplantable thumb amputations, the rPIA flap was performed for arterial inflow to the secondary toe-to-thumb transfer. Venous congestion of varying degrees was noted in 7 cases involving partial necrosis in 2 cases. During the mean 17 months of follow-up, patients were generally satisfied with the final outcomes. Conclusion: The rPIA flap can be used not only for soft tissue coverage of the hand and upper extremity but also as a recipient arterial pedicle for a secondary toe-to thumb transfer.


Hand Clinics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Chi Chen ◽  
Mark T. Buchman ◽  
Fu-Chan Wei

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-130
Author(s):  
Paul Tran ◽  
Crystal Kavanagh ◽  
Steven L. Moran

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Khajuria

Abstract Introduction The BOAST/BAPRAS updated the open fracture guidelines in December 2017 to replace BOAST 4 Open fracture guidelines; the changes gave clearer recommendations for timing of surgery and recommendations for reducing infection rates. Method Our work retrospectively evaluates the surgical management of open tibia fractures at a Major Trauma Centre (MTC), over a one-year period in light of key standards (13,14 and 15 of the standards for open fractures). Results The vast majority of cases (93%) had definitive internal stabilization only when immediate soft tissue coverage was achievable. 90% of cases were not managed as ‘clean cases’ following the initial debridement. 50% of cases underwent definitive closure within 72 hours. The reasons for definitive closure beyond 72hours were: patients medically unwell (20%), multiple wound debridement’s (33%) and no medical or surgical reason was clearly stated (47%). Conclusions The implementation of a ‘clean surgery’ protocol following surgical debridement is essential in diminishing risk of recontamination and infection. Hence, this must be the gold standard and should be clearly documented in operation notes. The extent of availability of a joint Orthoplastic theatre list provides a key limiting step in definitive bony fixation and soft tissue coverage of open tibia fractures.


Head & Neck ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. Cordeiro ◽  
David A. Hidalgo

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan S. Friedstat ◽  
Michelle R Coriddi ◽  
Eric G Halvorson ◽  
Joseph J Disa

Wound management and soft-tissue repair can vary depending on the location. The head and neck, chest and back, arm and forearm, hand, abdomen, gluteal area and perineum, thigh, knee, lower leg, and foot all have different local options and preferred free flaps to use for reconstruction. Secondary reconstruction requires a detailed analysis of all aspects of the wound including any scars, soft tissue and/or skin deficits, functional defects, contour defects, complex or composite defects, and/or unstable previous wound coverage. Careful monitoring of both the patient and reconstruction is necessary in the postoperative period to ensure long-term success.   This review contains 2 figures and 17 references. Key Words: free tissue transfer, pedicle flaps, soft-tissue coverage, wound closure, wound healing, wound management, wound reconstruction, tissue flaps


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document