scholarly journals Body Image and Quality of Life and Brace Wear Adherence in Females With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. e519-e523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci Schwieger ◽  
Shelly Campo ◽  
Stuart L. Weinstein ◽  
Lori A. Dolan ◽  
Sato Ashida ◽  
...  
Spine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Traci Schwieger ◽  
Shelly Campo ◽  
Stuart L. Weinstein ◽  
Lori A. Dolan ◽  
Sato Ashida ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gozde Yagci ◽  
Yavuz Yakut

Background: There are several kinds of scoliosis-specific and general physiotherapeutic exercise methods used in scoliosis rehabilitation. But there is need for comparable studies on the effectiveness of different exercise approaches for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Objectives: Comparison of the effects of combined core stabilization exercise and bracing treatment with Scientific Exercises Approach to Scoliosis and bracing treatment in patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Methods: Thirty females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, who have moderate curves (20°–45°), were randomly divided into two groups. In addition to brace wearing for 4 months, one group received core stabilization exercise therapy, while the other received scientific exercises approach to scoliosis exercise therapy. The outcome measures were based on Cobb angle, angle of trunk rotation, body symmetry, cosmetic trunk deformity, and quality of life. Results: Thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles and trunk rotation angles, body symmetry, and cosmetic trunk deformity improved for both groups. Quality of life did not change in either group. The pain domain of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire improved in the core stabilization group only. Conclusion: Both treatment conditions including core stabilization with bracing and scientific exercises approach to scoliosis with bracing had similar effects in the short-term treatment of moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical relevance This study showed that when scientific exercises approach to scoliosis (SEAS) and core stabilization (CS) exercises were administered with equal intensity, the effects of the two treatment protocols including CS and bracing and SEAS and bracing were similar in the treatment of patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (16) ◽  
pp. 1460-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Helenius ◽  
Elias Diarbakerli ◽  
Anna Grauers ◽  
Markus Lastikka ◽  
Hanna Oksanen ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. S36
Author(s):  
Baron S. Lonner ◽  
Courtney Toombs ◽  
Suken A. Shah ◽  
Patrick J. Cahill ◽  
Burt Yaszay ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trixie Mak ◽  
Prudence Wing Hang Cheung ◽  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Abstract Background: Thoracic scoliosis has been shown to be associated with hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the relationship of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters with different coronal curve patterns and their influence on patient-perceived quality of life is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between coronal and sagittal malalignment in patients with AIS and to determine their effects on SRS-22r scores. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1054 consecutive patients with AIS. The coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on standing radiographs. The coronal Cobb angle (mild: 10-20°; moderate: >20-40°; severe: >40°) and PI (low: <35°; average: 35-50°; high: >50°) were divided into 3 sub-groups for comparison. Relationship between coronal curve magnitudes and sagittal parameters was studied as was their association with SRS-22r scores. Results: Low PI had smaller SS (30.1±8.3° vs 44.8±7.7°; p<0.001), PT (-0.3±8.1° vs 14.4±7.5°; p<0.001), and LL (42.0±13.2° vs 55.1±10.6°; p<0.001), negative PI-LL mismatch (-12.1±13.1° vs 4.1±10.5°; p<0.001) as compared to large PI. There were no significant relationships with PI and TK (p=0.905) or curve magnitude (p=0.431). No differences in sagittal parameters were observed for mild, moderate or severe coronal Cobb angles. SRS-22r scores only correlated with coronal Cobb angle and larger Cobb angles were negatively correlated with the function, appearance and pain domains. Conclusions: The sagittal profile for AIS is associated with the pelvic parameters especially PI but not with the coronal curve pattern. All patients have a similar TK regardless of coronal curve type. However, it appears that the coronal deformity is a greater influence on quality of life outcomes especially those >40°.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document