Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery to Minimize Staff Radiation Exposure

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. E45-E53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Edström ◽  
Gustav Burström ◽  
Artur Omar ◽  
Rami Nachabe ◽  
Michael Söderman ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Edström ◽  
Gustav Burström ◽  
Rami Nachabe ◽  
Paul Gerdhem ◽  
Adrian Elmi Terander

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment of several spine disorders requires placement of pedicle screws. Detailed 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic information facilitates this process and improves accuracy. OBJECTIVE To present a workflow for a novel augmented-reality-based surgical navigation (ARSN) system installed in a hybrid operating room for anatomy visualization and instrument guidance during pedicle screw placement. METHODS The workflow includes surgical exposure, imaging, automatic creation of a 3D model, and pedicle screw path planning for instrument guidance during surgery as well as the actual screw placement, spinal fixation, and wound closure and intraoperative verification of the treatment results. Special focus was given to process integration and minimization of overhead time. Efforts were made to manage staff radiation exposure avoiding the need for lead aprons. Time was kept throughout the procedure and subdivided to reflect key steps. The navigation workflow was validated in a trial with 20 cases requiring pedicle screw placement (13/20 scoliosis). RESULTS Navigated interventions were performed with a median total time of 379 min per procedure (range 232-548 min for 4-24 implanted pedicle screws). The total procedure time was subdivided into surgical exposure (28%), cone beam computed tomography imaging and 3D segmentation (2%), software planning (6%), navigated surgery for screw placement (17%) and non-navigated instrumentation, wound closure, etc (47%). CONCLUSION Intraoperative imaging and preparation for surgical navigation totaled 8% of the surgical time. Consequently, ARSN can routinely be used to perform highly accurate surgery potentially decreasing the risk for complications and revision surgery while minimizing radiation exposure to the staff.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110285
Author(s):  
Andrew Hersh ◽  
Smruti Mahapatra ◽  
Carly Weber-Levine ◽  
Tolulope Awosika ◽  
John N. Theodore ◽  
...  

Augmented reality (AR) navigation refers to novel technologies that superimpose images, such as radiographs and navigation pathways, onto a view of the operative field. The development of AR navigation has focused on improving the safety and efficacy of neurosurgical and orthopedic procedures. In this review, the authors focus on 3 types of AR technology used in spine surgery: AR surgical navigation, microscope-mediated heads-up display, and AR head-mounted displays. Microscope AR and head-mounted displays offer the advantage of reducing attention shift and line-of-sight interruptions inherent in traditional navigation systems. With the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s recent clearance of the XVision AR system (Augmedics, Arlington Heights, IL), the adoption and refinement of AR technology by spine surgeons will only accelerate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 843-852
Author(s):  
Gustav Burström ◽  
Oscar Persson ◽  
Erik Edström ◽  
Adrian Elmi-Terander

Abstract Background Conventional spinal navigation solutions have been criticized for having a negative impact on time in the operating room and workflow. AR navigation could potentially alleviate some of these concerns while retaining the benefits of navigated spine surgery. The objective of this study is to summarize the current evidence for using augmented reality (AR) navigation in spine surgery. Methods We performed a systematic review to explore the current evidence for using AR navigation in spine surgery. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from database inception to November 27, 2020, for data on the AR navigation solutions; the reported efficacy of the systems; and their impact on workflow, radiation, and cost-benefit relationships. Results In this systematic review, 28 studies were included in the final analysis. The main findings were superior workflow and non-inferior accuracy when comparing AR to free-hand (FH) or conventional surgical navigation techniques. A limited number of studies indicated decreased use of radiation. There were no studies reporting mortality, morbidity, or cost-benefit relationships. Conclusions AR provides a meaningful addition to FH surgery and traditional navigation methods for spine surgery. However, the current evidence base is limited and prospective studies on clinical outcomes and cost-benefit relationships are needed.


Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (22) ◽  
pp. 1598-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustav Burström ◽  
Rami Nachabe ◽  
Robert Homan ◽  
Jurgen Hoppenbrouwers ◽  
Ronald Holthuizen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Schupper ◽  
Jeremy Steinberger ◽  
Yakov Gologorsky

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554581-s-0035-1554581
Author(s):  
José Vicente Ballesteros Plaza ◽  
Ratko Jovan Yurac Barrientos ◽  
Enrique Andrés Viveros Pereira

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin W. Su ◽  
T. David Luo ◽  
Amy L. McIntosh ◽  
Beth A. Schueler ◽  
Jennifer A. Winkler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document