Novel 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis Method for Measuring the Lumbar Spine Range of Motion

Spine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (21) ◽  
pp. E1327-E1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michio Tojima ◽  
Naoshi Ogata ◽  
Arito Yozu ◽  
Masahiko Sumitani ◽  
Nobuhiko Haga
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
3 Dimensional

Charge couple device-based system for 3-dimensional real time positioning on the assessment of segmental range of motion of lumbar spine

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-278
Author(s):  
Zhao Ping ◽  
Chen Li-jun ◽  
Guan Jing ◽  
Pan Li ◽  
Ding Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Charge Couple Device ◽  
3 Dimensional

Impairment Tutorial: Recurrent Radioculpathy: Recurrent Radioculpathy and Apportionment

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Leon H. Ensalada
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Disk Herniation ◽  
Fourth Edition ◽  
Recurrent Injury ◽  
Injury Model ◽  
Whole Person ◽  
Spinal Region

Abstract Recurrent radiculopathy is evaluated by a different approach in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, compared to that in the Fourth Edition. The AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, specifies several occasions on which the range-of-motion (ROM), not the Diagnosis-related estimates (DRE) method, is used to rate spinal impairments. For example, the AMA Guides, Fifth Edition, clarifies that ROM is used only for radiculopathy caused by a recurrent injury, including when there is new (recurrent) disk herniation or a recurrent injury in the same spinal region. In the AMA Guides, Fourth Edition, radiculopathy was rated using the Injury Model, which is termed the DRE method in the Fifth Edition. Also, in the Fourth Edition, for the lumbar spine all radiculopathies resulted in the same impairment (10% whole person permanent impairment), based on that edition's philosophy that radiculopathy is not quantifiable and, once present, is permanent. A rating of recurrent radiculopathy suggests the presence of a previous impairment rating and may require apportionment, which is the process of allocating causation among two or more factors that caused or significantly contributed to an injury and resulting impairment. A case example shows the divergent results following evaluation using the Injury Model (Fourth Edition) and the ROM Method (Fifth Edition) and concludes that revisions to the latter for rating permanent impairments of the spine often will lead to different results compared to using the Fourth Edition.

scholarly journals A Scoring System for Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Ossification of the Lumbar Spine in Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis: Relationship Between the Extent of Ligament Ossification and the Range of Motion

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199668
Author(s):  
Yusuke Murakami ◽  
Tadao Morino ◽  
Masayuki Hino ◽  
Hiroshi Misaki ◽  
Hiroshi Imai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis ◽  
Disc Height ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Intervertebral Disc Height ◽  
The Relationship

Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Objective: To investigate the relationship between the extent of ligament ossification and the range of motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine and develop a new scoring system. Methods: Forty-three patients (30 men and 13 women) with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent decompression from January to December 2018. Ligament ossification at L1/2 to L5/S was assessed on plain X-ray (Xp) and computed tomography (CT) using a modified Mata scoring system (0 point: no ossification, 1 point: ossification of less than half of the intervertebral disc height, 2 points: ossification of half or more of the intervertebral disc height, 3 points: complete bridging), and the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the scoring was assessed. The relationship of the scores with postoperative lumbar ROM was investigated. Result: Intra-rater reliability was high (Cronbach’s α was 0.74 for L5/S on Xp but 0.8 or above for other sections), as was inter-rater reliability (Cronbach’s α was 0.8 or above for all the segments). ROM significantly decreased as the score increased (scores 1 to 2, and 2 to 3). A significant moderate negative correlation was found between the sum of the scores at L1/2-L5/S and the ROM at L1-S (ρ = − 0.4493, P = 0.025). Conclusion: Our scoring system reflects lumbar mobility and is reproducible. It is effective for assessing DISH in fractures and spinal conditions, and monitoring effects on treatment outcomes and changes over time.

Comparison of a Fluoroscopic 3-Dimensional Imaging System and Conventional CT in Detection of Pars Fractures in the Cadaveric Lumbar Spine

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 429-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher K. Kepler ◽  
Helene Pavlov ◽  
Richard J. Herzog ◽  
Bernard A. Rawlins ◽  
Yoshimi Endo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Conventional Ct

scholarly journals Regaining motion among patients with shoulder pathology - are all exercises equal?

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110671
Author(s):  
Alon Rabin ◽  
Eran Maman ◽  
Oleg Dolkart ◽  
Efi Kazum ◽  
Zvi Kozol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
The Self ◽  
Flexion Angle ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Flexion ◽  
Shoulder Disorders ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Shoulder Range

Background Little information exists to guide the choice of exercise for regaining shoulder range of motion (ROM). The purpose of this study was to compare the maximal ROM reached, pain and difficulty associated with 4 commonly prescribed exercises. Methods Forty (9 females) patients with various shoulder disorders and a limited flexion ROM performed 4 exercises for regaining shoulder flexion ROM in a randomized order. Exercises included the self-assisted flexion, forward bow, table slide and rope-and-pulley. Participants were videotaped while performing all exercises and the maximal flexion angle reached during each exercise was recorded using Kinovea motion analysis freeware (Kinovea 0.8.15). Pain intensity and the perceived level of difficulty associated with each exercise were also recorded. Results The forward bow and table slide generated significantly greater ROM compared with the self-assisted flexion and rope-and-pulley (P ≤ 0.005). The self-assisted flexion was associated with a greater pain intensity compared with the table slide and rope-and-pulley (P = 0.002) and a greater perceived level of difficulty compared with the table slide (P = 0.006). Conclusions Due to the greater ROM allowed, and similar or even lower level of pain or difficulty, clinicians may wish to initially recommend the forward bow and table slide for regaining shoulder flexion ROM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document