scholarly journals Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Niu ◽  
Can-Cheng Liu ◽  
Bing-Lin Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Gang Song ◽  
Huang Chen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Van Booven ◽  
Victor Sandoval ◽  
Oleksander Kryvenko ◽  
Madhumita Parmar ◽  
Andres Briseño ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Nagpal ◽  
Davis Foote ◽  
Fraser Tan ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Arvaniti ◽  
Kim S. Fricker ◽  
Michael Moret ◽  
Niels J. Rupp ◽  
Thomas Hermanns ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Gleason grading system remains the most powerful prognostic predictor for patients with prostate cancer since the 1960’s. Its application requires highly-trained pathologists, is tedious and yet suffers from limited inter-pathologist reproducibility, especially for the intermediate Gleason score 7. Automated annotation procedures constitute a viable solution to remedy these limitations.In this study, we present a deep learning approach for automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Our system was trained using detailed Gleason annotations on a discovery cohort of 641 patients and was then evaluated on an independent test cohort of 245 patients annotated by two pathologists. On the test cohort, the inter-annotator agreements between the model and each pathologist, quantified via Cohen’s quadratic kappa statistic, were 0.75 and 0.71 respectively, comparable with the inter-pathologist agreement (kappa=0.71). Furthermore, the model’s Gleason score assignments achieved pathology expert-level stratification of patients into prognostically distinct groups, on the basis of disease-specific survival data available for the test cohort.Overall, our study shows promising results regarding the applicability of deep learning-based solutions towards more objective and reproducible prostate cancer grading, especially for cases with heterogeneous Gleason patterns.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter Bulten ◽  
Hans Pinckaers ◽  
Hester van Boven ◽  
Robert Vink ◽  
Thomas de Bel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Van Booven ◽  
Victor Sandoval ◽  
Madhumita Parmar ◽  
Oleksandr Kryvenko ◽  
Andres Briseño ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 117714-117725
Author(s):  
Yuchun Li ◽  
Mengxing Huang ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Haixia Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document