Abstract 187: Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using digital pathology and genomic signatures

Author(s):  
Derek Van Booven ◽  
Victor Sandoval ◽  
Oleksander Kryvenko ◽  
Madhumita Parmar ◽  
Andres Briseño ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter Bulten ◽  
Hans Pinckaers ◽  
Hester van Boven ◽  
Robert Vink ◽  
Thomas de Bel ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Nagpal ◽  
Davis Foote ◽  
Fraser Tan ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
Po-Hsuan Cameron Chen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eirini Arvaniti ◽  
Kim S. Fricker ◽  
Michael Moret ◽  
Niels J. Rupp ◽  
Thomas Hermanns ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Gleason grading system remains the most powerful prognostic predictor for patients with prostate cancer since the 1960’s. Its application requires highly-trained pathologists, is tedious and yet suffers from limited inter-pathologist reproducibility, especially for the intermediate Gleason score 7. Automated annotation procedures constitute a viable solution to remedy these limitations.In this study, we present a deep learning approach for automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. Our system was trained using detailed Gleason annotations on a discovery cohort of 641 patients and was then evaluated on an independent test cohort of 245 patients annotated by two pathologists. On the test cohort, the inter-annotator agreements between the model and each pathologist, quantified via Cohen’s quadratic kappa statistic, were 0.75 and 0.71 respectively, comparable with the inter-pathologist agreement (kappa=0.71). Furthermore, the model’s Gleason score assignments achieved pathology expert-level stratification of patients into prognostically distinct groups, on the basis of disease-specific survival data available for the test cohort.Overall, our study shows promising results regarding the applicability of deep learning-based solutions towards more objective and reproducible prostate cancer grading, especially for cases with heterogeneous Gleason patterns.


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1786
Author(s):  
Aurelia Bustos ◽  
Artemio Payá ◽  
Andrés Torrubia ◽  
Rodrigo Jover ◽  
Xavier Llor ◽  
...  

The prediction of microsatellite instability (MSI) using deep learning (DL) techniques could have significant benefits, including reducing cost and increasing MSI testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Nonetheless, batch effects or systematic biases are not well characterized in digital histology models and lead to overoptimistic estimates of model performance. Methods to not only palliate but to directly abrogate biases are needed. We present a multiple bias rejecting DL system based on adversarial networks for the prediction of MSI in CRC from tissue microarrays (TMAs), trained and validated in 1788 patients from EPICOLON and HGUA. The system consists of an end-to-end image preprocessing module that tile samples at multiple magnifications and a tissue classification module linked to the bias-rejecting MSI predictor. We detected three biases associated with the learned representations of a baseline model: the project of origin of samples, the patient’s spot and the TMA glass where each spot was placed. The system was trained to directly avoid learning the batch effects of those variables. The learned features from the bias-ablated model achieved maximum discriminative power with respect to the task and minimal statistical mean dependence with the biases. The impact of different magnifications, types of tissues and the model performance at tile vs patient level is analyzed. The AUC at tile level, and including all three selected tissues (tumor epithelium, mucin and lymphocytic regions) and 4 magnifications, was 0.87 ± 0.03 and increased to 0.9 ± 0.03 at patient level. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that incorporates a multiple bias ablation technique at the DL architecture in digital pathology, and the first using TMAs for the MSI prediction task.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Niu ◽  
Can-Cheng Liu ◽  
Bing-Lin Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Gang Song ◽  
Huang Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Van Booven ◽  
Victor Sandoval ◽  
Madhumita Parmar ◽  
Oleksandr Kryvenko ◽  
Andres Briseño ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document