Effect of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Yamamoto ◽  
Junji Okuda ◽  
Keitaro Tanaka ◽  
Keisaku Kondo ◽  
Keiko Asai ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleny Novaes Figueiredo ◽  
Fabio Guilherme Campos ◽  
Luiz Augusto D’Albuquerque ◽  
Sergio Carlos Nahas ◽  
Ivan Cecconello ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erdinc Kamer ◽  
Turan Acar ◽  
Fevzi Cengiz ◽  
Evren Durak ◽  
Mehmet Haciyanli

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 653-653
Author(s):  
Masanori Hotchi ◽  
Yuhei Waki ◽  
Kazunori Tokuda ◽  
Masayoshi Obatake ◽  
Hiroshi Kotegawa ◽  
...  

653 Background: The impact of previous abdominal surgeries on the need for conversion to open surgery and on short-term outcomes during/after laparoscopic colorectal surgery was retrospectively investigated. This retrospective cohort study was conducted from May 2004 through October 2012. This study was conducted at Tokushima University Hospital and Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital. Methods: A total of 145 consecutive patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection of the sigmoid colon and upper rectum were classified as not having previous abdominal surgery (NPAS group, n = 123) or as having previous abdominal surgery (PAS group, n = 22). Short-term outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Results: The population of previous abdominal surgery consisted of 6 appendectomy, 3 gastrectomy for gastric ulcer, 2 nephrectomy, 2 peritonitis and 11 others (2 duplication). There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, tumor location, tumor size, Stage, operating time, blood loss and number of lymph node harvest between the two groups. The conversion to open surgery was performed in 1 patient (4.5%) in the PAS group and 6 patients (4.9%) in the NPAS group. The intraoperative inadvertent enterotomy occurred in 1 patient in the NPAS group. There was no difference in postoperative morbility between the two groups. In the NPAS group, anastomotic leakage was observed in 3 cases. Ileus was observed in one case in the NPAS and none in the PAS. Postoperative hospital stay was 14 days in the PAS group and 16 days in the NPAS group. Conclusions: Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer with previous abdominal surgery are acceptable.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 2122
Author(s):  
Ismail Eray ◽  
Ugur Topal ◽  
Orcun Yalav ◽  
Kubilay Dalci ◽  
Ahmet Saritas ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1015-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Barleben ◽  
Dhruvil Gandhi ◽  
Xuan-Mai Nguyen ◽  
Fred Che ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
...  

Laparoscopic techniques in colon surgery reduce postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, and 30-day morbidity when compared with open surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of a laparoscopic colectomy in patients who have previously undergone abdominal surgery. We performed a retrospective, single-institution review of laparoscopic colorectal procedures for benign or malignant pathology between October 2002 and September 2008. Our analysis included 55 patients who previously had laparoscopic, open, or a combination of procedures and subsequently underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We observed a 14.5 per cent conversion rate (n = 8). Of the patients who had previous open procedures (n = 48 [87.3%]), the conversion rate was 16.7 per cent. Only one patient (12.5%) who had a history of only laparoscopic surgery required conversion. The highest conversion rate in our study was from patients who underwent a left colectomy (60%, n = 3/5), which was the only statistically significant factor found for conversion. Since the emergence of laparoscopy, use in colon and rectal surgery nationwide has been poor as a result of multiple factors, including a frequent history of abdominal surgery. Our experience shows that laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery can be completed with an acceptable conversion rate.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Fukunaga ◽  
Masao Kameyama ◽  
Masayasu Kawasaki ◽  
Masashi Takemura ◽  
Yushi Fujiwara

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document