Fake Online Physician Reviews in Aesthetic Dermatology

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan V. Wang ◽  
Kerry Heitmiller ◽  
Monica Boen ◽  
Nazanin Saedi
Keyword(s):  
Aesthetic Dermatology ◽  
Physician Reviews

Impairment Tutorial: Spinal Cord Stimulation and Intraspinal Opioids:Impairment Rating Issues

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
James B. Talmage ◽  
Leon H. Ensalada
Keyword(s):  
Medical Records ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Satisfaction Survey ◽  
Start Time ◽  
Medical Evaluation ◽  
Independent Medical Evaluation ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Physician Reviews ◽  
Written Informed Consent

Abstract Evaluators must understand the complex overall process that makes up an independent medical evaluation (IME), whether the purpose of the evaluation is to assess impairment or other care issues. Part 1 of this article provides an overview of the process, and Part 2 [in this issue] reviews the pre-evaluation process in detail. The IME process comprises three phases: pre-evaluation, evaluation, and postevaluation. Pre-evaluation begins when a client requests an IME and provides the physician with medical records and other information. The following steps occur at the time of an evaluation: 1) patient is greeted; arrival time is noted; 2) identity of the examinee is verified; 3) the evaluation process is explained and written informed consent is obtained; 4) questions or inventories are completed; 5) physician reviews radiographs or diagnostic studies; 6) physician records start time and interviews examinee; 7) physician may dictate the history in the presence of the examinee; 8) physician examines examinee with staff member in attendance, documenting negative, physical, and nonphysiologic findings; 9) physician concludes evaluation, records end time, and provides a satisfaction survey to examinee; 10) examinee returns satisfaction survey before departure. Postevaluation work includes preparing the IME report, which is best done immediately after the evaluation. To perfect the IME process, examiners can assess their current approach to IMEs, identify strengths and weaknesses, and consider what can be done to improve efficiency and quality.

Digital Photography in Aesthetic Dermatology

2017 ◽  
pp. 229-243
Author(s):  
Jean-Marie Sainthillier ◽  
Sophie Mac-Mary ◽  
Philippe Humbert
Keyword(s):  
Digital Photography ◽  
Aesthetic Dermatology

scholarly journals Photoepilation and skin photorejuvenation: an update

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Martella ◽  
Mauro Raichi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Vascular Malformations ◽  
Purchase Price ◽  
Aesthetic Dermatology ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Skin Conditions ◽  
Laser Devices ◽  
Skin Coverage ◽  
Comparative Trials

The effectiveness of intense pulsed light (IPL) and laser devices is widely accepted in aesthetic dermatology for unwanted hair removal and treatment of a variety of cutaneous conditions. Overall, most comparative trials have demonstrated similar effectiveness for IPL and laser devices. Literature studies alternatively favor the IPL and laser concepts, but the incidence of severe local pain and side effects were generally lower with IPL. IPL phototherapy, already established as a sound option in photoepilation and treatment of photoaging, hyperpigmentation and other skin conditions, is also considered first choice in the phototherapy of skin vascular malformations. When treating large areas, as often required in photoepilation and many aesthetic dermatology indications, IPL technologies show advantages over laser-based devices because of their high skin coverage rate. Compared to lasers, the wide range of selectable treatment settings, though a strong advantage of IPL, may also imply some more risk of local thermal side effects, but almost only in the hands of poorly trained operators. Overall, the strongest advantages of the IPL technologies are robust technology, versatility, lower purchase price, and the negligible risk of serious adverse effects in the hands of skilled and experienced operators.

Aesthetic dermatology: What's new, what's true?

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. e12623
Author(s):  
Uwe Wollina ◽  
Piotr Brzezinski
Keyword(s):  
Aesthetic Dermatology

Gender Biases in Online Physician Ratings: Female Doctors Evaluated More Harshly by Patients (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Barnett ◽  
Margrét Vilborg Bjarnadóttir ◽  
David Anderson ◽  
Chong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Online Reviews ◽  
Physician Services ◽  
Female Physicians ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Gender Biases ◽  
Online Ratings ◽  
Physician Reviews ◽  
And Gender ◽  
State Medical Boards

BACKGROUND Prior research has highlighted gender differences in online physician reviews, however, to date no research has linked online ratings with quality of care. OBJECTIVE To compare a consumer-generated measure of physician quality (online ratings) with a clinical quality outcome (sanctions for malpractice or improper behavior), to understand how patients’ perception and evaluation of doctors differ based on the physician’s gender and quality. METHODS We use data from a large online doctor reviews website and the Federation of State Medical Boards. We implement paragraph vector methods to identify words that are specific to and indicative of the separate groups of physicians. We then enrich these findings by utilizing the NRC word-emotion association lexicon to assign emotional scores to the various segments: gender, gender and sanction, and gender and rating. RESULTS We find significant differences in the sentiment and emotion of reviews for male and female physicians. We find that numerical ratings are lower and the sentiment in text reviews is more negative for women who will be sanctioned than for men who will be sanctioned; sanctioned male doctors are still associated with positive reviews. CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: Given the growing impact of online reviews on demand for physician services, understanding the different reviews faced by male and female physicians is important for consumers and for platform architects in order to revisit their platform design.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document