scholarly journals Gender influences on editorial decisions at EPIDEMIOLOGY

Epidemiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrystelle Kiang ◽  
Jay S. Kaufman ◽  
Stephanie J. London ◽  
Sunni L. Mumford ◽  
Sonja A. Swanson ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annett Hüttges ◽  
Doris Fay

1984 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Ostrom
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-660
Author(s):  
Nicole Votolato Montgomery ◽  
Amanda P. Cowen

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 810-819
Author(s):  
Atasha Reddy ◽  
Sanjana Brijball Parumasur

This study assesses employee perceptions of the influence of diversity dimensions (race, gender, religion, language, sexual orientation, attitudes, values, work experience, physical ability, economic status, personality) on their interactiions with co-workers as well as on their organization in its daily operations. These perceptions were also compared and gender related correlates were assessed. The study was undertaken in a public sector Electricity Department in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The population includes 100 employees in the organization, from which a sample of 81 was drawn using simple random sampling. Data was collected using a self-developed, pre-coded, self-administered questionnaire whose reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings reflect that employees perceive that their interactions with co-workers are most likely to be influenced by attitudes, work experience and personality and that daily organizational operations are most likely to be influenced by race, work experience and attitudes. Furthermore, religion and sexual orientation are perceived as having the least influence on co-worker interaction and day-to-day organizational operations. In the study it was also found that employees perceive that race followed by gender influences day-to-day organizational operations to a larger extent than it influences co-worker interactions. Recommendations made have the potential to enhance the management of workforce diversity


2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S Marras ◽  
Kermit G Davis ◽  
Michael Jorgensen
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. eabd0299
Author(s):  
Flaminio Squazzoni ◽  
Giangiacomo Bravo ◽  
Mike Farjam ◽  
Ana Marusic ◽  
Bahar Mehmani ◽  
...  

Scholarly journals are often blamed for a gender gap in publication rates, but it is unclear whether peer review and editorial processes contribute to it. This article examines gender bias in peer review with data for 145 journals in various fields of research, including about 1.7 million authors and 740,000 referees. We reconstructed three possible sources of bias, i.e., the editorial selection of referees, referee recommendations, and editorial decisions, and examined all their possible relationships. Results showed that manuscripts written by women as solo authors or coauthored by women were treated even more favorably by referees and editors. Although there were some differences between fields of research, our findings suggest that peer review and editorial processes do not penalize manuscripts by women. However, increasing gender diversity in editorial teams and referee pools could help journals inform potential authors about their attention to these factors and so stimulate participation by women.


BDJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 224 (10) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
M. Wilson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document