scholarly journals Baseline estrogen levels in postmenopausal women participating in the MAP.3 breast cancer chemoprevention trial

Menopause ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 693-700
Author(s):  
Harriet Richardson ◽  
Vikki Ho ◽  
Romain Pasquet ◽  
Ravinder J. Singh ◽  
Matthew P. Goetz ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Demets ◽  
Polly A. Newcomb ◽  
Patrick Carey

2016 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Tanya E. Keenan ◽  
Jon O. Ebbert ◽  
DeAnn Lazovich ◽  
Alice H. Wang ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Yeomans Kinney ◽  
Chesley Richards ◽  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
Victor G. Vogel

2011 ◽  
Vol 212 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruijuan Gao ◽  
Lijuan Zhao ◽  
Xichun Liu ◽  
Brian G Rowan ◽  
Martin Wabitsch ◽  
...  

Elevated circulating estrogen levels, as a result of increased peripheral aromatization of androgens by aromatase, have been indicated to underlie the association between obesity and a higher risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Although aromatase inhibitors have been used as a first-line therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, their potential as breast cancer chemopreventive agents has been limited due to toxicities and high costs. It is therefore imperative to develop new aromatase-inhibiting/suppressing agents with lower toxicities and lower costs for breast cancer chemoprevention, especially in obese postmenopausal women. The expression of the aromatase gene,CYP19, is controlled in a tissue-specific manner by the alternate use of different promoters. In obese postmenopausal women, increased peripheral aromatase is primarily attributed to the activity of the glucocorticoid-stimulated promoter, PI.4, and the cAMP-stimulated promoter, PII. In the present study, we show that methylseleninic acid (MSA), a second-generation selenium compound, can effectively suppress aromatase activation by dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, and forskolin, a specific activator of adenylate cyclase. Unlike the action of aromatase inhibitors, MSA suppression of aromatase activation is not mediatedviadirect inhibition of aromatase enzymatic activity. Rather, it is attributable to a marked downregulation of promoters PI.4- and PII-specific aromatase mRNA expression, and thereby a reduction of aromatase protein. Considering the low-cost and low-toxicity nature of MSA, our findings provide a strong rationale for the further development of MSA as a breast cancer chemopreventive agent for obese postmenopausal women.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 2327-2333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew N. Freedman ◽  
Binbing Yu ◽  
Mitchell H. Gail ◽  
Joseph P. Costantino ◽  
Barry I. Graubard ◽  
...  

Purpose The Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) demonstrated that raloxifene was as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer (IBC) in postmenopausal women and had lower risks of thromboembolic events, endometrial cancer, and cataracts but had a nonstatistically significant higher risk of noninvasive breast cancer. There is a need to summarize the risks and benefits of these agents. Patients and Methods Baseline incidence rates of IBC and other health outcomes, absent raloxifene and tamoxifen, were estimated from breast cancer chemoprevention trials; the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program; and the Women's Health Initiative. Effects of raloxifene and tamoxifen were estimated from STAR and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. We assigned weights to health outcomes to calculate the net benefit from raloxifene compared with placebo and tamoxifen compared with placebo. Results Risks and benefits of treatment with raloxifene or tamoxifen depend on age, race, breast cancer risk, and history of hysterectomy. Over a 5-year period, postmenopausal women with an intact uterus had a better benefit/risk index for raloxifene than for tamoxifen. For postmenopausal women without a uterus, the benefit/risk ratio was similar. The benefits and risks of raloxifene and tamoxifen are described in tables that can help identify groups of women for whom the benefits outweigh the risks. Conclusion We developed a benefit/risk index to quantify benefits from chemoprevention with tamoxifen or raloxifene. This index can complement clinical evaluation in deciding whether to initiate chemoprevention and in comparing the benefits and risks of raloxifene versus tamoxifen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document