scholarly journals Religious and Spiritual Beliefs of Gynecologic Oncologists May Influence Medical Decision Making

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lois Ramondetta ◽  
Alaina Brown ◽  
Gwyn Richardson ◽  
Diana Urbauer ◽  
Premal H. Thaker ◽  
...  

BackgroundReligious (R) and spiritual (S) beliefs often affect patients' health care decisions, particularly with regard to care at the end of life. Furthermore, patients desire more R/S involvement by the medical community; however, physicians typically do not incorporate R/S assessment into medical interviews with patients. The effects of physicians' R/S beliefs on willingness to participate in controversial clinical practices such as medical abortions and physician-assisted suicide has been evaluated, but how a physician's R/S beliefs may affect other medical decision-making is unclear.MethodsUsing SurveyMonkey, an online survey tool, we surveyed 1972 members of the International Gynecologic Oncologists Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists to determine the R/S characteristics of gynecologic oncologists and whether their R/S beliefs affected their clinical practice. Demographics, religiosity, and spirituality data were collected. Physicians were also asked to evaluate 5 complex case scenarios.ResultsTwo hundred seventy-three (14%) physicians responded. Sixty percent "agreed" or "somewhat agreed" that their R/S beliefs were a source of personal comfort. Forty-five percent reported that their R/S beliefs ("sometimes," "frequently," or "always") play a role in the medical options they offered patients, but only 34% "frequently" or "always" take a R/S history from patients. Interestingly, 90% reported that they consider patients' R/S beliefs when discussing end-of-life issues. Responses to case scenarios largely differed by years of experience, although age and R/S beliefs also had influence.ConclusionsOur results suggest that gynecologic oncologists' R/S beliefs may affect patient care but that most physicians fail to take an R/S history from their patients. More work needs to be done to evaluate possible barriers that prevent physicians from taking a spiritual history and engaging in discussions over these matters with patients.

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Schmid ◽  
R. S. Allen ◽  
P. P. Haley ◽  
J. DeCoster

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-205
Author(s):  
Jay M. Baruch

Contrary to popular belief, a patient’s signature on a piece of paper does not constitute informed consent. This article describes the ethical framework of consent in the context of the larger process of informed decision making. The elements of informed consent are examined in practical terms. Common pitfalls are addressed, with strategies to help anticipate and resolve possible dilemmas. These important tools are integral to all levels of medical decision making, including those at the end of life. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(2): 198-205, 2004)


2020 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 104441
Author(s):  
Ricki S. Carroll ◽  
Eliza Hirst ◽  
Mark Hudson ◽  
Molly Shaw ◽  
Stephanie A. Deutsch

Author(s):  
Suraj Pai ◽  
Tracy Andrews ◽  
Amber Turner ◽  
Aziz Merchant ◽  
Michael Shapiro

Background: Medical advances prolong life and treat illness but many patients have chronically debilitating conditions that prevent them from making end-of-life (EOL) decisions for themselves. These situations are difficult to navigate for both patient and physician. This study investigates physicians’ feelings and approach toward EOL care, physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and euthanasia. Methods: An anonymous, self-administered online survey was distributed through the New Jersey Medical School servers and American College of Surgeons forums. The survey presented clinical EOL vignettes and subjective questions regarding PAS and euthanasia. Results: We obtained 142 responses from attending physicians. Respondents were typically male (61%), married (85%), identified as Christian (54%), had more than 20 years of experience (55%), and worked at a university hospital (57%). Religious beliefs and years of work experience seemed to be significant contributors in EOL decision making, whereas gender and medical specialty were not significantly influential. Conclusion: Factors such as years of work experience and religious belief may influence medical professionals’ opinions about PAS and euthanasia and their subsequent actions regarding EOL care. In many cases, the boundaries are blurred and require further study before concrete conclusions can be made.


2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H. Ditto ◽  
Nikki A. Hawkins ◽  
David A. Pizarro

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Haoyang Yan ◽  
Stephanie K. Kukora ◽  
Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren ◽  
Patricia J. Deldin ◽  
Kenneth Pituch ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document