Comparison of the Prognoses of FIGO Stage I to Stage II Adenosquamous Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Treated With Radical Hysterectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1389-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seiji Mabuchi ◽  
Mika Okazawa ◽  
Yasuto Kinose ◽  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Masateru Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Uterine Cervix ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Adenosquamous Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Histological Subtype

ObjectivesTo evaluate the significance of adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) compared with adenocarcinoma (AC) in the survival of surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 163 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to stage IIB cervical cancer who had been treated with radical hysterectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy between January 1998 and December 2008. The patients were classified according to the following: (1) histological subtype (ASC group or AC group) and (2) pathological risk factors (low-risk or intermediate/high-risk group). Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model to investigate the prognostic significance of histological subtype.ResultsClinicopathological characteristics were similar between the ASC and AC histology groups. Patients with the ASC histology displayed a PFS rate similar to that of the patients with the AC histology in both the low-risk and intermediate/high-risk groups. Neither the recurrence rate nor the pattern of recurrence differed between the ASC group and the AC group. Univariate analysis revealed that patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis and parametrial invasion achieved significantly shorter PFS than those without these risk factors.ConclusionsCharacteristics of the patients and the tumors as well as survival outcomes of ASC were comparable to adenocarcinoma of early-stage uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy. Our results in part support that the management of ASC could be the same as the one of AC of the uterine cervix.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Radical Hysterectomy Followed By Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Intermediate- or High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of The Cervix: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi-ying Zhang ◽  
Zi Liu ◽  
Ya-li Wang ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves outcomes of cervical cancer patients with risk factors. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has an inferior survival than open radical hysterectomy (ORH), however, the impact of MIS on postoperative RT remains uncertain. The study compared the impacts of MIS versus ORH on delivering of adjuvant RT or CRT for intermediate- or high-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Methods Data on stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and postoperative RT/CRT in our institution, from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with high or intermediate-risk factors who met the Sedlis criteria received postoperative pelvic external beam radiotherapy (50Gy/25f) with platinum-based chemotherapy (0–6 cycles) according to guidelines. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in the two surgical groups. Results One hundred and twenty-nine patients eligible for the study (68 in ORH; 61 in MIS groups) had similar clinicopathologic features except for the stage (highest in MIS was IB1; IIA1 in ORH) and presence of lymph vascular space invasion (higher in MIS group). The median time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and to RT was shorter in the MIS group. Three-year DFS and OS were similar in both groups. Further sub-analysis indicated that the DFS and OS in intermediate/high-risk groups had no significant difference. Cox-multivariate analyses found that tumor size > 4 cm and time interval from surgery to RT beyond seven weeks were adverse independent prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusions In early-stage (IB1-IIA2) cervical cancer patients with intermediate or high-risk factors who received postoperative RT or CRT, no matter they received ORH or MIS as their primary treatment, the DFS and OS had no significant difference, despite TI from surgery to postoperative adjuvant therapy being shorter in the MIS group than ORH.

scholarly journals Clinical implication of surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer with multiple high-risk factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Seiji Mabuchi ◽  
Mika Okazawa ◽  
Mahiru Kawano ◽  
Hiromasa Kuroda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Implication ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

The impact of multiple high-risk factors on survival outcome of surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
K. Matsuo ◽  
S. Mabuchi ◽  
M. Okazawa ◽  
Y. Matsumoto ◽  
K. Yoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3387
Author(s):  
Jordi Ponce ◽  
Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez ◽  
Antonio Gil-Moreno ◽  
Pluvio J. Coronado ◽  
Jesús De la Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence

This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the risk factors for recurrence in patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer (≤IB1 or IIA1, FIGO 2009) undergoing robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Spain and Portugal between 2009 and 2018. A second primary objective was to audit the oncological outcomes according to quality indicators (QI) proposed by the European Society of Gynecology Oncology (ESGO). The study population included 239 women. After a median follow-up of 51 months, recurrence occurred in 26 patients (10.9%). Independent factors for recurrence were clinical tumor size > 20 mm (hazard ratio (HR) 2.37), adenocarcinoma as histological type (HR 2.51), positive pelvic lymph nodes (HR 4.83), tumor grade 2 (HR 4.99), tumor grade 3 (HR 8.06), and having not performed sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) (HR 4.08). All 5 QI selected were surpassed by our results. In patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing robotic radical hysterectomy, clinicians should be aware that tumor grade 2 and 3, tumor size > 20 mm, adenocarcinoma, positive pelvic nodes, and lack of performance of SLNB are risk factors for recurrence. Fulfillment of QI targets of the ESGO might be considered as an objective oncological outcome indicator supporting the minimally invasive approach for early-stage cervical cancer treatment.

Efficacy and toxicity of postoperative external beam radiotherapy or chemoradiation for early-stage cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1878-1886
Author(s):  
Mick J E van den Akker ◽  
Nanda Horeweg ◽  
Jogchum Jan Beltman ◽  
Carien L Creutzberg ◽  
Remi A Nout
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the evolving role of the addition of chemotherapy to postoperative radiotherapy on oncological outcomes and toxicity in patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with stage IB1–IIB FIGO 2009 cervical cancer treated from November 1999 to May 2015 by primary surgery and radiotherapy (46–50.4 Gy in 1.8–2.0 Gy fractions) with or without concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2, 5–6 weekly cycles) with or without a brachytherapy boost. Chemotherapy was allocated depending on the risk factors for recurrence. Incidences of all outcomes were calculated using Kaplan–Meier’s methodology and compared by log-rank tests. Risk factors for recurrence and survival were identified using Cox’s proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 154 patients were included, median follow-up was 9.6 years (IQR: 6.1–12.8). Five-year pelvic recurrence-free survival was 75.3%; 74.7% in patients with high-risk factors treated with radiotherapy; and 77.3% in those treated with chemoradiation (P=0.43). Distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years was 63.4%; 63.6% in high-risk patients after radiotherapy; and 57.1% after chemoradiation (P=0.36). Five-year overall survival was 63.9%: 66.8% and 51.6% after radiotherapy and after chemoradiation in patients with high-risk factors (P=0.37), respectively. Large tumor size was a risk factor for vaginal and pelvic recurrence, ≥2 involved lymph nodes was a significant risk factor for para-aortic recurrence and death. Mild treatment-related late toxicity was observed in 53.9% of the patients. Five-year severe (grade 3–5) late rectal, bladder, bowel, and vaginal toxicities were, respectively, 1.3%, 0%, 3.4%, and 0.9%. Any late severe toxicity was observed in 5.5% of patients treated with radiotherapy and in 15.3% of those treated with chemoradiation (P=0.07).ConclusionPostoperative (chemo)radiation for early-stage cervical cancer patients with risk factors for recurrence yields adequate pelvic tumor control, but overall survival is limited due to distant metastasis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document