scholarly journals Who Signs Up for and Engages in a Peer Support Heart Failure Self-management Intervention

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. S35-S43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Mase ◽  
Lakshmi Halasyamani ◽  
Hwajung Choi ◽  
Michele Heisler
2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. E9-E16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng-Hsin Tung ◽  
Chun-Yu Lin ◽  
Kuei-Ying Chen ◽  
Chien-Jung Chang ◽  
Yu-Ping Lin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1175-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke S Tielemans ◽  
Vera PM Schepers ◽  
Johanna MA Visser-Meily ◽  
Jolanda CM van Haastregt ◽  
Wendy JM van Veen ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate whether the self-management intervention was implemented as intended. Additionally, we studied involvement in and satisfaction with the intervention among patients, their partners and therapists. Design: Mixed method, prospective study. Setting: Outpatient facilities of hospitals/rehabilitation centres. Participants: Stroke patients, their partners and therapists from the experimental arm of the Restore4Stroke Self-Management study. Intervention: ‘Plan Ahead!’ is a 10-week self-management intervention for stroke patients and partners, consisting of seven two-hour group sessions. Proactive action planning, education and peer support are main elements of this intervention. Main measures: Session logs, questionnaires for therapists, patients and their partners, and focus groups. Data analysis: Qualitative data were analysed with thematic analysis supplemented by quasi-statistics. Quantitative data were reported as descriptive statistics. Results: The study sample consisted of 53 patients and 26 partners taking part in the intervention, and all therapists delivering the intervention ( N = 19). At least three-quarters of the intervention sessions were attended by 33 patients and 24 partners. On a scale from 1 to 10, patients, partners and therapists rated the intervention with mean scores of 7.5 (SD1.6), 7.8 (SD.7) and 7.4 (SD.7), respectively. Peer support was the most frequently appreciated element for participants and therapists. The proactive action planning tool was adequately applied in 76 of the 96 sessions. Conclusion: Although the target audience was reached and both participants and therapists were satisfied with the intervention, the proactive action planning tool that distinguishes the current intervention from existing stroke-specific self-management interventions was only partly implemented according to protocol.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke ter Stal ◽  
Joanne Sloots ◽  
Aniel Ramlal ◽  
Harm op den Akker ◽  
Anke Lenferink ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Embodied Conversational Agents (ECAs) have the potential to stimulate actual use of eHealth applications. An ECA’s design influences the user’s perception during short interactions, but daily life evaluations of ECAs in healthcare are scarce. OBJECTIVE this is an exploratory, long-term study on the design of ECAs for eHealth. The study investigates how patients perceive the design of the ECA over time with regard to the ECA’s characteristics – friendliness, trustworthiness, involvement, expertise and authority –, small talk interaction, and likeliness of following the agent’s advice. METHODS we developed an ECA within an eHealth self-management intervention for patients with both Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Chronic Heart Failure (CHF), which we offered for four months. Patients rated five agent characteristics and likeliness of following the agent’s advice before use and after three and nine weeks of use. The amount of patients’ small talk interaction was assessed by log data. Lastly, individual semi-structured interviews were used to triangulate results. RESULTS eleven patients (7 male and 4 female) with COPD and CHF participated (median age 70 years). Patients’ perceptions of the agent characteristics did not change over time (P > 0.05 for all characteristics) and only one participant finished all small talk dialogues. After three weeks of use, the patients were less likely to follow the agent’s advice (P = .01). The agent’s messages were perceived as non-personalized and the feedback as inappropriate, affecting the agent’s perceived reliability. CONCLUSIONS this exploratory study provides first insights into ECA design for eHealth. The impression of an ECA’s design seems to remain during long-term use. To investigate future added value of ECAs in eHealth, perceived reliability should be improved by managing users’ expectations of the ECA’s capabilities and creating ECA designs fitting individual needs. CLINICALTRIAL Netherlands Trial register, NL6480. Registered 14 August 2017, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6480


Author(s):  
Joanne M. Sloots ◽  
Job Van Der Palen ◽  
Mirthe Bakker ◽  
Michiel Eijsvogel ◽  
Gerard Linssen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document