Pediatric Seat Belt Use in Motor Vehicle Collisions: The Need for Driver Education Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 292-296
Author(s):  
Adel Elkbuli ◽  
Brianna Dowd ◽  
Paul J. Spano ◽  
Mark McKenney
2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1009-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Metzger ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Paul A. MacLennan ◽  
Loring W. Rue

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1069-1071
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Marco ◽  
Akpofure Peter Ekeh ◽  
Claire Hardman ◽  
Matthew Lovell ◽  
Ashley Brent ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 254 ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Morgan Schellenberg ◽  
Nallely Saldana Ruiz ◽  
Vincent Cheng ◽  
Patrick Heindel ◽  
Erik Q. Roedel ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Donald S. Burke ◽  
Martha W. Bidez ◽  
Kathryn M. Mergl

In 2008, motor vehicle collisions resulted in 968 child occupant fatalities and 193,000 seriously injured children, ages 14 years old and younger, according to the most recent data provided by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) [1]. In fact, motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death for all children ages 3 to 14 years old living in the United States [1]. As children grow older they require size-appropriate restraint types to fit their body at each developmental level. For older children, booster seats are not a total solution for child safety as they are often dependent on the design of the vehicle seat belt system (2). Additionally, there is no federal standard that requires vehicle manufacturers to dynamically test the performance of child seats of any type in their vehicles.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1240-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic A. Borgialli ◽  
Angela M. Ellison ◽  
Peter Ehrlich ◽  
Bema Bonsu ◽  
Jay Menaker ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S70-S75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Hartka ◽  
Hannah M. Carr ◽  
Brittany R. Smith ◽  
Monica Melmer ◽  
Mark R. Sochor

Author(s):  
Jan Mario Breen ◽  
Pål Aksel Næss ◽  
Christine Gaarder ◽  
Arne Stray-Pedersen

AbstractWe performed a retrospective study of the injuries and characteristics of occupant fatalities in motor vehicle collisions in southeast Norway. The goal was to provide updated knowledge of injuries sustained in modern vehicles and detect possible differences in injury pattern between drivers and passengers. Forensic autopsy reports, police, and collision investigation reports from 2000 to 2014 were studied, data extracted and analyzed.A total of 284 drivers, 80 front-seat passengers, and 37 rear-seat passengers were included, of which 67.3% died in front collisions, 13.7% in near-side impacts, 13.5% in rollovers and 5.5% in other/combined collisions. Overall, 80.5% died within one hour after the crash. The presence of fatal injuries to the head, neck, thorax and abdomen were observed in 63.6%, 10.7%, 61.6% and 27.4% respectively. All occupants with severe injuries to the head or neck had signs of direct impact with contact point injuries to the skin or skull. Injuries to the heart and spleen were less common in front-seat passengers compared to drivers. Seat belt abrasions were more common and lower extremity fractures less common in both front-seat and rear-seat passengers compared to drivers. Blood alcohol and/or drug concentrations suggestive of impairment were present in 30% of all occupants, with alcohol more often detected among front-seat passengers compared to drivers.Few driver-specific and passenger-specific patterns of injury could be identified. When attempting to assess an occupant’s seating position within a vehicle, autopsy findings should be interpreted with caution and only in conjunction with documentation from the crash scene.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 4-7
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract Multiple factors determine the likelihood, type, and severity of bodily injury following a motor vehicle collision and, in turn, influence the need for treatment, extent of disability, and likelihood of permanent impairment. Among the most important factors is the change in velocity due to an impact (Δv). Other factors include the individual's strength and elasticity, body position at the time of impact, awareness of the impending impact (ie, opportunity to brace, guard, or contract muscles before an impact), and effects of braking. Because Δv is the area under the acceleration vs time curve, it combines force and duration and is a useful way to quantify impact severity. The article includes a table showing the results of a literature review that concluded, “the consensus of human subject research conducted to date is that a single exposure to a rear-end impact with a Δv of 5 mph or less is unlikely to result in injury” in most healthy, restrained occupants. Because velocity incorporates direction as well as speed, a vehicular occupant is less likely to be injured in a rear impact than when struck from the side. Evaluators must consider multiple factors, including the occupant's pre-existing physical and psychosocial status, the mechanism and magnitude of the collision, and a variety of biomechanical variables. Recommendations based solely on patient history and physical findings (and, perhaps, imaging studies) may be ill-informed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
James K. Kuan ◽  
Robert Kaufman ◽  
Jonathan L. Wright ◽  
Charles Mock ◽  
Avery B. Nathens ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document