Job satisfaction among oncology nurse practitioners

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Bourdeanu ◽  
Kris Skalski ◽  
Yuan Shen ◽  
Suya Wang ◽  
Shiyun Mai ◽  
...  
Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan R. Harris

The purpose of this review is to define axillary web syndrome (AWS) and describe its diagnosis and management. The following databases were searched through July 2017: PubMed, EMBASE (OvidSP), Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Search terms included ‘axillary web syndrome', ‘axillary cording', and ‘lymphatic cording'. 49 articles were identified; 8 did not relate to breast cancer, and 3 were not in English. Of the remaining articles, the majority were case reports, case series, or descriptive reviews. 2 systematic reviews were located as well as 1 randomized trial, 6 prospective cohort studies, and 2 retrospective cohort studies. Although a common sequela after axillary surgery for breast cancer staging, AWS has been poorly described in the medical literature as to the underlying pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Interventions range from patient education and simple reassurance that the syndrome will resolve spontaneously to active physical or manual therapies to maintain upper extremity range-of-motion, especially adequate motion for undergoing radiation therapy. Oncologists, breast surgeons, family physicians, and oncology nurse practitioners that work with patients with breast cancer should educate them about this prevalent complication and inform them preoperatively about what to anticipate.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Anne Margaret Walling ◽  
Christopher Pietras ◽  
Kauser Ahmed ◽  
Anne Coscarelli ◽  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
...  

105 Background: We aimed to engage oncologists to disseminate a successful pilot-tested shared mental model (SMM) for the integration of early advance care planning (ACP) and identification of palliative care (PC) needs across a health system’s oncologic practice. Methods: Our Oncology Communication Collaborative Team (OCCT) had oncology leadership support and included a multidisciplinary team representing leaders in oncology, ACP, PC, psycho-social oncology and quality. To communicate the SMM developed by our team, the OCCT developed an interactive Saturday session (1-hr didactic, 3-hr small group role-play) that focused on early ACP and the cognitive and emotional aspects of communication. Before and after the training, we asked participants to rate their ability to communicate with patients as well as their readiness, self-efficacy, and need for help to improve communication regarding prognosis, ACP, end of life care and symptom management using a previously validated survey. We computed means and compared matched pairs of pre and post surveys using a paired t-test. We also surveyed participants about whether they would recommend the course to others and planned changes to practice. Results: All but one oncologist (52/53), 3/4 invited fellows, and 12/14 oncology nurse practitioners participated and 90% of attendees completed pre and post surveys. Participants rated their communication ability higher (6.7 v. 7.6, p < 0.01) on a 10-point scale after the training. Readiness to improve communication in this domain (9.1 v. 9.2, p = 0.35) was similar before and after the training. Self-efficacy (1.5 v. 1.5, p = 0.70) and needing help to improve (1.6 v. 1.7, p = 0.37) were rated highly (1 = A lot and 4 = Not at all) but did not change with training. All but one participant reported they would recommend the course to others and free text responses about changes they planned to make to their practice based on the training included: having earlier ACP discussions, focusing on patient goals/priorities and asking open-ended questions. Conclusions: Conducting a training to disseminate a SMM of oncology and PC is feasible, valuable, and can be the first step for partnered continuous quality improvement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lusine Poghosyan ◽  
Jianfang Liu ◽  
Jingjing Shang ◽  
Thomas D’Aunno

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Colleen Moss ◽  
Joanie Jackson

There is a critical shortage of neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) in the United States. The NNP shortage increases workload and negatively affects job satisfaction, which ultimately impacts patient safety. Therefore, it is imperative to identify strategies to improve job satisfaction and retention. Authors of current evidence supported the connection between mentoring and role transition, job satisfaction, and intent to stay. Mentorship is key to the success of new graduate nurse practitioners as they develop confidence in the nurse practitioner (NP) role. The aim of this integrative review is to examine the existing evidence regarding mentoring of advanced practice nurses and the potential impact on the NNP workforce.


2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry R. Misener ◽  
DeAnna L. Cox

The purpose of this study was to construct a reliable and valid instrument to measure job satisfaction among nurse practitioners (NP). The methodological approach consisted of a literature review and modification of an extant instrument (Mueller/McCloskey, 1990) to reflect primary care, followed by augmentation and validation of the items suggested by nurse practitioner faculty members and Master’s prepared nurse practitioners. A 77-item scale was developed and mailed to 413 NPs recognized by the state boards of nursing in two states. Usable returns were received from 342 (83%) NPs. Items were reviewed for validity prior to field-testing the instrument. The 77 items were subjected to exploratory factor analysis to support construct explication using the maximum likelihood method of extraction and a promax rotation. An eigenvalue cutoff of 1.0 and item-to-factor loadings of at least .35 were criteria that guided item retention. Thirty-three items were deleted. The resultant six factors were named: (a) intra-practice partnership/collegiality; (b) challenge/ autonomy; (c) professional, social, and community interaction; (d) professional growth; (e) time; and (f) benefits. The six factors (subscales) produced internal consistency reliability estimates of .94, .89, .84, .86, .83, and .79, respectively. The 44 retained items were used to create the final version of the Misener Nurse Practitioner Job Satisfaction Scale (MNPJSS), with a possible maximum score of 264 using a 6-point Likert-type scale.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document