The 24-h blood pressure measurement may predict mortality and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zofia Dzielińska ◽  
Aleksander Prejbisz ◽  
Magdalena Makowiecka-Cieśla ◽  
Andrzej Januszewicz ◽  
Paweł Tyczyński ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kasiakogias ◽  
C Tsioufis ◽  
D Konstantinidis ◽  
P Iliakis ◽  
I Leontsinis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction There has been a long debate regarding the association of systolic versus diastolic blood pressure with cardiovascular outcome and data regarding hypertensive patients under treatment have been conflicting. Purpose To investigate the association of different patterns of uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) among treated hypertensive patients. Methods We prospectively studied 1507 treated hypertensive patients (age 59±11 years) that are followed in the setting of a single-center, clinic-based registry. During follow-up, patients underwent regular visits for hypertension and risk factor management. Based on the cut-off limits for uncontrolled hypertension of office systolic BP≥140mmHg and diastolic BP≥90mmHg, study participants were divided into four groups: those with controlled hypertension (796 patients, 53% of the population), uncontrolled systolic BP (257 patients, 17%), uncontrolled diastolic BP (135 patients, 9%) and uncontrolled systolic and diastolic BP (319 patients, 21%). The outcome studied was the composite of cardiovascular morbidity set as coronary artery disease and stroke, and the controlled hypertension group served as reference. Results The median follow-up period was 6.4±3.0 years and the composite endpoint (13 strokes and 41 cases of coronary artery disease) occurred in 54 patients (3.6%). Unadjusted Cox regression analysis showed that, compared to the reference group of controlled hypertensives, the risk for cardiovascular morbidity was similar in patients with uncontrolled diastolic BP (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.26–2.97) but significantly higher in patients with uncontrolled systolic BP (HR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.08–4.36), while patients with both uncontrolled systolic and diastolic BP showed the worse prognosis (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.24–4.43). This pattern of risk was overall sustained after adjusting for different sets of confounders. Conclusions Among treated hypertensive patients, uncontrolled systolic BP is associated with a greater risk for cardiovascular events compared to uncontrolled diastolic BP while uncontrolled systolodiastolic hypertension presents with the worse prognosis.


Author(s):  
Kazuomi Kario ◽  
Satoshi Hoshide ◽  
Keisuke Narita ◽  
Yukie Okawara ◽  
Hiroshi Kanegae ◽  
...  

Resistant hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor. This analysis of the JAMP study (Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) data investigated the effects of uncontrolled resistant hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring on the risk of heart failure (HF) and overall cardiovascular events. The JAMP study patients with hypertension and no HF history were included. They had true resistant hypertension (24-hour BP ≥130/80 mm Hg), pseudoresistant hypertension (24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg), well-controlled nonresistant hypertension (24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg), or uncontrolled nonresistant hypertension (24-hour BP ≥130/80 mm Hg). The primary end point was total cardiovascular events, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (fatal/nonfatal stroke and fatal/nonfatal coronary artery disease), and HF. During 4.5±2.4 years of follow-up the overall incidence per 1000 person-years was 10.1 for total cardiovascular disease, 4.1 for stroke, 3.5 for coronary artery disease, and 2.6 for HF. The adjusted risk of total cardiovascular and HF events was significantly increased in patients with true resistant versus controlled nonresistant hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.12–2.48]; P =0.012 and 2.24 [95% CI, 1.17–4.30]; P =0.015, respectively) and versus uncontrolled nonresistant hypertension (1.51 [1.03–2.20]; P =0.034 and 3.03 [1.58–5.83]; P <0.001, respectively). The findings were robust in a sensitivity analysis using a slightly different definition of resistant hypertension. True resistant hypertension diagnosed using ambulatory BP monitoring is a significant independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease events, especially for HF. This highlights the importance of diagnosing and effectively treating resistant hypertension. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ; Unique identifier: UMIN000020377.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Yang ◽  
H.B Leu

Abstract Background This study investigates the ideal achieved blood pressure (BP) in ethnic Chinese patients with coronary disease (CAD) and kidney failure (eGFR&lt;15 ml/min/1.73m2). Methods A total of 575 kidney failure patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were enrolled and divided into 6 to 4 groups according to blood pressure range were analyzed. The clinic outcomes included major cardiovascular events (MACE) and MACE plus hospitalization for congestive heart failure (Total CV event). Results The mean systolic BP was 135.02±24.73 mmHg and diastolic BP was 70.74±13.05 mmHg. Systolic BP 140–149mmHg and diastolic BP 80–89mmHg had lowest MACE/CV event incidence rate (11%/23%; 13.2%/21.1%) compare to other groups. Patients with systolic BP&lt;120mmHg had a higher risk MACE (HR: 2.014; 95% CI: 1.172–3.462, p=0.008) when compared to those with systolic BP 140–149 mmHg. Patients with systolic BP≥160mmHg (HR: 1.838; 95% CI, 3.266–1.035, p=0.038). And diastolic blood BP ≥90mmHg (HR: 2.191; 95% CI: 1.147–4.188, p=0.018) had a higher risk of total cardiovascular events when compared to those with systolic BP 140–149 mmHg and diastolic BP 80–89 mmHg. Conclusions A J-shaped BP association of systolic (140–149 mmHg) and diastolic (80–89 mmHg) was found with decreased cardiovascular events for coronary artery disease with kidney failure after undergoing PCI in non-western population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document