scholarly journals The efficacy of renal replacement therapy strategies for septic-acute kidney injury

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (16) ◽  
pp. e15257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjing Zha ◽  
Chuan Li ◽  
Gaoxiang Cheng ◽  
Lijuan Huang ◽  
Zhaoqing Bai ◽  
...  
Shock ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kengo Mayumi ◽  
Tetsushi Yamashita ◽  
Yoshifumi Hamasaki ◽  
Eisei Noiri ◽  
Masaomi Nangaku ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingxiao Zhang ◽  
Jiakun Tian ◽  
Hongzhi Sun ◽  
Kumar Digvijay ◽  
Mauro Neri ◽  
...  

Sepsis is the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit. As the most common treatment of septic AKI, it is believed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can not only maintain the water balance and excrete the metabolic products but also regulate the inflammation and promote kidney recovery. CRRT can remove the inflammatory cytokines to regulate the metabolic adaption in kidney and restore the kidney recovery to protect the kidney in septic AKI. Second, CRRT can provide extra energy supply in septic AKI to improve the kidney energy balance in septic AKI. Third, the anticoagulant used in CRRT also regulates the inflammation in septic AKI. CRRT is not only a treatment to deal with the water balance and metabolic products, but also a method to regulate the inflammation in septic AKI. Video Journal Club ‘Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco’ at https://www.karger.com/Journal/ArticleNews/223997?​sponsor=52.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Sheng ◽  
Jingye Yang ◽  
Gang Yu ◽  
Yang Fei ◽  
Hongda Bao ◽  
...  

Background: Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome leading to severe sepsis and septic shock. It is very common in the intensive care unit with high mortality. Thus, judging its prognosis is extremely important. Procalcitonin (PCT) and ­N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels are commonly elevated in sepsis patients, but only a few are discussed in the septic acute kidney injury patients (AKI) who received renal replacement therapy (RRT). Our study is aimed at investigating the prognostic value of PCT and NT-proBNP in septic AKI patients who received RRT. Methods: This was a retrospective study of septic AKI patients who underwent RRT in a Chinese university hospital. All enrolled patients tested PCT and NT-proBNP at RRT initiation. PCT and NT-proBNP levels were compared between the survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the 2 biomarkers were performed for predicting in-hospital mortality. According to the median value of PCT (16.2 ng/mL) and NT-proBNP (10,271 pg/mL), patients were divided into 4 groups (low PCT and low NT-proBNP; high PCT and low NT-proBNP; low PCT and high NT-proBNP; high PCT and high NT-proBNP). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyze the 28-day survival rate in the 4 groups. Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in the study. Of which, 48 (59.3%) patients died during hospitalization. The median of NT-proBNP in non-survivors was significantly higher than in survivors (p = 0.001), while PCT had no significant difference (p = 0.412). The area under the ROC curve of PCT and NT-proBNP for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.561 (95% CI 0.426–0.695) and 0.729 (95% CI 0.604–0.854). Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that increased NT-proBNP level was associated with 28-day mortality while combined with PCT there was no statistical difference in 4 different level groups. Conclusion: NT-proBNP has a certain predictive value for the prognosis in septic AKI patients who received RRT. It seems that the initial PCT value for prognosis is limited. The combination of PCT and ­NT-proBNP to evaluate the prognosis in these critically ill patients is currently unclear.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Shimoyama ◽  
Osamu Umegaki ◽  
Noriko Kadono ◽  
Toshiaki Minami

Abstract Background Sepsis is the most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) among critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine whether presepsin is a predictor of septic acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy initiation (RRTi) in sepsis patients, and prognosis in septic AKI patients. Methods Presepsin values were measured immediately after ICU admission (baseline) and on Days 2, 3, and 5 after ICU admission. Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Index, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were measured at baseline, and total scores (“inflammation-presepsin scores [iPS]”) were calculated for category classification. Presepsin values, inflammation-based prognostic scores, and iPS were compared between patients with and without septic AKI or RRTi and between survivors and non-survivors. Results Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified the following variables as predictors of septic AKI and RRTi in sepsis patients: presepsin on Day 1 (AUC: 0.73) and Day 2 (AUC: 0.71) for septic AKI, and presepsin on Day 1 (AUC: 0.71), Day 2 (AUC: 0.9), and Day 5 (AUC: 0.96), Δpresepsin (Day 2 – Day 1) (AUC: 0.84), Δpresepsin (Day 5 – Day 1) (AUC: 0.93), and PNI (AUC: 0.72) for RRTi. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified presepsin on Day 2 as a predictor of prognosis in septic AKI patients. Conclusions Presepsin and PNI were found to be predictors of septic AKI, RRTi in sepsis patients, and prognosis in septic AKI patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Shimoyama ◽  
Osamu Umegaki ◽  
Noriko Kadono ◽  
Toshiaki Minami

Abstract Background Sepsis is the most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) among critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine whether presepsin is a predictor of septic acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy initiation (RRTi) in sepsis patients, and prognosis in septic AKI patients. Methods Presepsin values were measured immediately after ICU admission (baseline) and on Days 2, 3, and 5 after ICU admission. Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio, Prognostic Index, and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) were measured at baseline. Total scores were calculated (hereafter, “inflammation-presepsin scores [iPS]”) for category classification. Presepsin values, inflammation-based prognostic scores, and iPS were compared between patients with and without septic AKI or RRTi and between survivors and non-survivors. Results Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses identified the following variables as predictors of septic AKI and RRTi in sepsis patients: presepsin on Day 1 (AUC: 0.73) and Day 2 (AUC: 0.71) for septic AKI, and presepsin on Day 1 (AUC: 0.71), Day 2 (AUC: 0.9), and Day 5 (AUC: 0.96), Δpresepsin (Day 2 – Day 1) (AUC: 0.84), Δpresepsin (Day 5 – Day 1) (AUC: 0.93), and PNI (AUC: 0.72) for RRTi. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified presepsin on Day 2 as a predictor of prognosis in septic AKI patients. Conclusions Presepsin and PNI were found to be predictors of septic AKI, RRTi in sepsis patients, and prognosis in septic AKI patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document